The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The need for action in sociocultural research
Abstract
The goal of sociocultural research is to understand the relationship between human mental functioning, on the one hand, and cultural, historical, and institutional setting, on the other. In a world characterized by rapid political transitions, newly awakened nationalism, and many other forms of potentially positive, but often deadly change, sociocultural research has never been more timely. It represents one of the ways that psychology, anthropology, education, and related disciplines can take a new step in entering into public discourse about today's most compelling issues. A sampling of issues of concern to sociocultural researchers might include cultural differences in how identity is defined and formed, historical changes in the understanding of human rights, and differences (say, between school and workplace) in how mathematical reasoning practices are carried out. While these examples all involve comparison – a technique that is generally one of the most powerful we have for sociocultural research – it is not the case that, to qualify as sociocultural, a study must employ comparative methods. What is essential is that the sociocultural situation of mental functioning be recognized and addressed in some way. The fact that sociocultural research is formulated in terms of a relationship (i.e., between mental processes and sociocultural setting) raises a set of questions about underlying assumptions. Do mental processes provide the key to understanding sociocultural setting or the other way around? Or is neither (or both) of these formulations appropriate?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Emotions and Teacher Identity: A poststructural perspective
Zembylas, M. (2003) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/13540600309378 · Cited by 963
Regulation of Teacher Elicitations in the Mathematics Classroom
Nathan, M. J., & Kim, S. (2009) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370000902797304 · Cited by 71
The importance of elementary school students’ social chat online: Reconceptualising the curriculum
Maher, D. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.03.009 · Cited by 39
Hardin, B. J., Lower, J. K., Smallwood, G. R., Chakravarthi, S., Li, L., & Jordan, C. (2010) · Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/10901020903539580 · Cited by 38
JONES, A. (2011) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00631.x · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Wertsch, J. V.
- Venue
- Sociocultural Studies of Mind
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1995-04-28
- Pages
- 56-74
- OpenAlex
- W2990312281
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.29
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The need for action in sociocultural research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9781139174299.004
- The paper
- Wertsch, J. V. (1995). The need for action in sociocultural research. Sociocultural Studies of Mind. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139174299.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.