Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship
Abstract
This chapter proposes a sociocultural approach that involves observation of development in three planes of analysis corresponding to personal, interpersonal, and community processes. I refer to developmental processes corresponding with these three planes of analysis as apprenticeship, guided participation, and participatory appropriation, in turn. These are inseparable, mutually constituting planes comprising activities that can become the focus of analysis at different times, but with the others necessarily remaining in the background of the analysis. I argue that children take part in the activities of their community, engaging with other children and with adults in routine and tacit as well as explicit collaboration (both in each others' presence and in otherwise socially structured activities) and in the process of participation become prepared for later participation in related events. Developmental research has commonly limited attention to either the individual or the environment – for example, examining how adults teach children or how children construct reality, with an emphasis on either separate individuals or independent environmental elements as the basic units of analysis. Even when both the individual and the environment are considered, they are often regarded as separate entities rather than being mutually defined and interdependent in ways that preclude their separation as units or elements (Dewey & Bentley, 1949; Pepper, 1942; Rogoff, 1982, 1992). Vygotsky's emphasis on the interrelated roles of the individual and the social world in microgenetic, ontogenetic, sociocultural, and phylogenetic development (Scribner, 1985; Wertsch, 1985) includes the individual and the environment together in successively broader time frames.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Close guidance is important for learning knowledge that would be difficult to learn without the assistance of a more knowledgeable partner.
“Close guidance is important for learning knowledge that would be difficult to learn without the assistance of a more knowledgeable partner (Rogoff 1995).”
From Workplace participatory practices: Conceptualising workplaces as learning environments (2004) · cites this paper as Rogoff 1995
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reframing Professional Development Through Understanding Authentic Professional Learning
Webster-Wright, A. (2009) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654308330970 · Cited by 1,174 · see citing works
Mentoring beginning teachers: What we know and what we don’t
Hobson, A. J., Ashby, P., Malderez, A., & Tomlinson, P. D. (2009) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2008.09.001 · Cited by 1,146 · see citing works
Workplace participatory practices: Conceptualising workplaces as learning environments
Billett, S. (2004) · Journal of Workplace Learning · doi:10.1108/13665620410550295 · Cited by 765 · see citing works
Toward a Workplace Pedagogy: Guidance, Participation, and Engagement
Billett, S. (2002) · Adult Education Quarterly · doi:10.1177/074171302237202 · Cited by 416 · see citing works
Conceptions of learning and understanding learning at work
Hager *, P. (2004) · Studies in Continuing Education · doi:10.1080/158037042000199434 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Bennett, S. V. (2013) · Urban Education · doi:10.1177/0042085912452155 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
“This principle also mirrors sociocultural and situated learning theories as knowledge is socially constructed, shared, and recreated within a community of learners (Dewey, 1963; Lave & Wenger, 1991; Nasir & Hand, 2006; Rogoff, 1995; Vygotsky, 1978).”
BackgroundSociocultural and situative approaches to studying motivation
Nolen, S. B., & Ward, C. J. (2008) · Advances in Motivation and Achievement · doi:10.1016/s0749-7423(08)15013-0 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Jimenez-Silva, M., Olson, K., & Jimenez Hernandez, N. (2012) · The Teacher Educator · doi:10.1080/08878730.2011.632471 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Hardin, B. J., Lower, J. K., Smallwood, G. R., Chakravarthi, S., Li, L., & Jordan, C. (2010) · Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/10901020903539580 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Kilinc, S., Borowski, N. D., Millinger, J., & Kelley, M. F. (2025) · Journal of Childhood, Education & Society · doi:10.37291/2717638x.202562611 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rogoff, B.
- Affiliations
- University of California System (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rogoff, Barbara
- ORCID
- Rogoff, Barbara
- Venue
- Sociocultural Studies of Mind
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1995-04-28
- Pages
- 139-164
- OpenAlex
- W1906057136
- Cited by
- 1,990
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 78 · 2017: 92 · 2016: 85 · 2015: 129 · 2014: 120 · 2013: 99 · 2012: 104
- FWCI
- 47.35
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Psychology of Development and Education
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
- Keywords
- sociocultural development, apprenticeship, guided participation, child development, individual and environment, community participation, interpersonal processes, Vygotsky
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review