Cited by 1,990Psychology of Development and EducationInnovative Education and Learning PracticesEarly Childhood Education and Development

Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship

Rogoff, Barbara·1995·Sociocultural Studies of Mind

Abstract

This chapter proposes a sociocultural approach that involves observation of development in three planes of analysis corresponding to personal, interpersonal, and community processes. I refer to developmental processes corresponding with these three planes of analysis as apprenticeship, guided participation, and participatory appropriation, in turn. These are inseparable, mutually constituting planes comprising activities that can become the focus of analysis at different times, but with the others necessarily remaining in the background of the analysis. I argue that children take part in the activities of their community, engaging with other children and with adults in routine and tacit as well as explicit collaboration (both in each others' presence and in otherwise socially structured activities) and in the process of participation become prepared for later participation in related events. Developmental research has commonly limited attention to either the individual or the environment – for example, examining how adults teach children or how children construct reality, with an emphasis on either separate individuals or independent environmental elements as the basic units of analysis. Even when both the individual and the environment are considered, they are often regarded as separate entities rather than being mutually defined and interdependent in ways that preclude their separation as units or elements (Dewey & Bentley, 1949; Pepper, 1942; Rogoff, 1982, 1992). Vygotsky's emphasis on the interrelated roles of the individual and the social world in microgenetic, ontogenetic, sociocultural, and phylogenetic development (Scribner, 1985; Wertsch, 1985) includes the individual and the environment together in successively broader time frames.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9781139174299.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Close guidance is important for learning knowledge that would be difficult to learn without the assistance of a more knowledgeable partner.

    “Close guidance is important for learning knowledge that would be difficult to learn without the assistance of a more knowledgeable partner (Rogoff 1995).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rogoff, B.
Affiliations
University of California System (US)
Corresponding author
Rogoff, Barbara
Venue
Sociocultural Studies of Mind
Published
1995-04-28
Pages
139-164
OpenAlex
W1906057136
Cited by
1,990
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 78 · 2017: 92 · 2016: 85 · 2015: 129 · 2014: 120 · 2013: 99 · 2012: 104
FWCI
47.35
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Psychology of Development and Education
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
sociocultural development, apprenticeship, guided participation, child development, individual and environment, community participation, interpersonal processes, Vygotsky

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review