Cited by 21Cultural Differences and ValuesJapanese History and CultureInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Honoring the individual

Sato, Nancy·1996·Teaching and Learning in Japan

Abstract

Introduction No one seems to dispute the common notion that Japan is a group-oriented society, whereas the United States is an individualistic society (Nakane, 1970; Smith, 1983). But, rather than group oriented, the Japanese may be relations oriented , where one's relations to the social world are highlighted. A relations orientation emphasizes the importance of one's relational situation in the world, but the relation is not always to the group. The relation can be with one or more persons, with the surrounding environment, with aspects of oneself, and with experiences. Breaking away from the “group-oriented” theory allows one to see that group orientation is not necessarily the starting point; rather, it is the end product of a complex web of mutual obligations and responsibilities, with individual relations as the building blocks. Defining group membership and dynamics occurs in this layered architecture of individuals and their interdependent relations carefully crafted over time. This raises a provocative question: can group orientation and individualism be distinguished, as they are in Western thought? Within this framework, I argue that individual and group dimensions are complementary aspects of teaching–learning processes in Japan, and that both individual and group orientations are nurtured in Japanese elementary classrooms. This essay begins with a brief examination of the Japanese notion of self, and then explores the educational implications of a relational focus through a description of school and classroom practices.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9781139174480.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sato, N.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Sato, Nancy
Venue
Teaching and Learning in Japan
Published
1996-02-23
Pages
119-153
OpenAlex
W2489659570
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.94
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Japanese History and Culture
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
individualism, group orientation, Japanese elementary education, teaching practice, teaching-learning process, interdependence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review