The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Submodular Function Maximization
Abstract
In this chapter we will introduce submodularity and some of its generalizations, illustrate how it arises in various applications, and discuss algorithms for optimizing submodular functions. Submodularity is a property of set functions with deep theoretical consequences and far-reaching applications. At first glance it seems very similar to concavity, in other ways it resembles convexity. It appears in a wide variety of applications: in Computer Science it has recently been identified and utilized in domains such as viral marketing [39], information gathering [44], image segmentation [10, 40, 36], document summarization [56], and speeding up satisfiability solvers [73]. Our emphasis in this chapter is on maximization; there are many important results and applications related to minimizing submodular functions that we do not cover. As a concrete running example, we will consider the problem of deploying sensors in a drinking water distribution network (see Figure 3.1) in order to detect contamination. In this domain, we may have a model of how contaminants, accidentally or maliciously introduced into the network, spread over time. Such a model then allows to quantify the benefit f(A) of deploying sensors at a particular set A of locations (junctions or pipes in the network) in terms of the detection performance (such as average time to detection). Based on this notion of utility, we then wish to find an optimal subset A ⊆ V of locations maximizing the utility, max A f(A) , subject to some constraints (such as bounded cost). This application requires solving a difficult real-world optimization problem, that can be handled with the techniques discussed in this chapter (Krause et al. [49] show in detail how submodular optimization can be applied in this domain.)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Finite-time Analysis of the Multiarmed Bandit Problem
Auer, P., Cesa-Bianchi, N., & Fischer, P. (2002) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1013689704352 · Cited by 6,033
Cited by
“Why Should I Trust You?”: Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier
Ribeiro, M., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/n16-3020 · Cited by 6,682
Anchors: High-Precision Model-Agnostic Explanations
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11491 · Cited by 2,162
“We use an iterative, greedy method that provides guarantees on the quality of our solution, due to the submodular nature of the optimization (Krause and Golovin 2014).”
MethodA tutorial on Gaussian process regression: modelling, exploring, and exploiting functions
Schulz, E., Speekenbrink, M., & Krause, A. (2018) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2018.03.001 · Cited by 1,735
Self-citationStreaming submodular maximization: massive data summarization on the fly
Badanidiyuru, A., Mirzasoleiman, B., Karbasi, A., & Krause, A. (2014) · Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/2623330.2623637 · Cited by 300
Self-citation"Why is 'Chicago' deceptive?" Towards Building Model-Driven Tutorials for Humans
Lai, V., Liu, H., & Tan, C. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376873 · Cited by 123
Metadata
- Authors
- Krause, A., & Golovin, D.
- Venue
- Tractability
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2014-02-06
- Pages
- 71-104
- OpenAlex
- W2500139799
- Cited by
- 751
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 154.35
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Submodular Function Maximization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9781139177801.004
- The paper
- Krause, A., & Golovin, D. (2014). Submodular Function Maximization. Tractability. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139177801.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.