The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Law's Fragile State: Colonial, Authoritarian, and Humanitarian Legacies in Sudan
Abstract
How do a legal order and the rule of law develop in a war-torn state? Using his field research in Sudan, the author uncovers how colonial administrators, postcolonial governments and international aid agencies have used legal tools and resources to promote stability and their own visions of the rule of law amid political violence and war in Sudan. Tracing the dramatic development of three forms of legal politics - colonial, authoritarian and humanitarian - this book contributes to a growing body of scholarship on law in authoritarian regimes and on human rights and legal empowerment programs in the Global South. Refuting the conventional wisdom of a legal vacuum in failed states, this book reveals how law matters deeply even in the most extreme cases of states still fighting for political stability.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Despite widely held grievances, however, nonviolent organized resistance was limited, in part, because the regime had succeeded in dismantling many of the formal civil society groups that had led mobilization during prior popular uprisings (Berridge 2015) including independent NGOs (Kadoda and Hale 2015, 221), professional unions and associations (Massoud 2013, 121), and the civil service (Mann 2”
From Coordinated Dis-Coordination (2024) · cites this paper as Massoud 2013, 121
Citations
Cited by
Items 201–210 of 210
Croese, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197901878.002.0007
Inside the Government, Outside the Law
Croese, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197901878.003.0004
Bringing Residents’ Committees Back into Law
Croese, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197901878.003.0007
Croese, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197901878.002.0005
Croese, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197901878.003.0005
Croese, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197901878.003.0002
Croese, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197901878.003.0006
Croese, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197901878.002.0006
The Rise and Fall of People’s Power
Croese, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197901878.003.0003
Law and Development: Past, Present, and Future
Davis, K. E. (2026) · The Law and Development Review · doi:10.1515/ldr-2026-0099
Metadata
- Authors
- Massoud, M. F.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
- Corresponding author
- Massoud, Mark Fathi
- ORCID
- Massoud, Mark Fathi
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2013-05-27
- OpenAlex
- W4250395077
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 8.10
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Peacebuilding and International Security
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › War, Law, and Justice
- Keywords
- rule of law, legal politics, authoritarian regimes, international humanitarian law, legal empowerment, failed states, legislative gaps, postcolonial governance, foreign aid, political violence, Sudan
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review