The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pulling apart? Treatment of pluralism in the CEDAW and the Maputo Protocol
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Kenya, Uganda, Malawi, Ghana and Zimbabwe are some of the countries that have undergone wide-scale constitutional reforms and have removed these exemption clauses, while the constitutions of Botswana, Zambia, and Lesotho still contain these exemption clauses (Nyamu-Musembi 2013, 199-200).”
From The Coloniality and Evolution of African Customary Law (2025) · cites this paper as Nyamu-Musembi 2013, 199-200
In the citing paper
“Postindependence, exemption clauses in equality and non-discrimination provisions of independence constitutions prevented judicial officers from peering into personal codes to strike any customs and practices for discrimination”
From The Coloniality and Evolution of African Customary Law (2025) · cites this paper as Nyamu-Musembi 2013
In the citing paper
“The only countries that have not removed exemption clauses from their constitutions are Zambia, Botswana, and Lesotho - all in Southern Africa”
From The Coloniality and Evolution of African Customary Law (2025) · cites this paper as Nyamu-Musembi 2013, 200
Citations
Cites
African Customary Law, Customs, and Women's Rights
Ndulo (2011) · Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies · doi:10.2979/indjglolegstu.18.1.87 · Cited by 170
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- 10.1007/s12142-006-1017-4 · DOI
- Hinz, 2006, The Shade of New Leaves: Governance in Traditional Authority: A Southern African Perspective
- Musembi, Are local norms and practices fences or pathways? The example of women’s property rights, Cultural Transformation and Human Rights in Africa, 126
- 10.1007/s10691-007-9078-6 · DOI
- Mamdani, 2000, Beyond Rights Talk and Culture Talk: Comparative Essays on the Politics of Rights and Culture
- Mwambene, 2007, Reconciling African customary law with women’s rights in Malawi: the Proposed Marriage, Divorce and Family Relations Bill, Malawi Law Journal, 1, 113
- Cook, 1990, Reservations to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, Virginia Journal of International Law, 30, 643
- Ghai, 1967, Independence and safeguards in Kenya’, East African Law Journal, 3, 177
- 10.2307/3773789 · DOI
- Morris, 1966, Uganda: The Development of its Laws and Constitution
- Cotran, 1987, Casebook on Kenya Customary Law
- Hellum, 1999, Women’s Human Rights and Pluralism in Africa: Mixed Norms and Identities in Infertility Management in Zimbabwe
- 10.1017/S0021855306000258 · DOI
- Cohen, 1992, Burying S.M.: The Politics of Knowledge and the Sociology of Power in Africa
- 10.2307/1410156 · DOI
- 10.2307/3773320 · DOI
- Mkangi, 1983, The Social Cost of Small Families and Land Reform: A Case Study of the Wataita of Kenya
- Amadiume, 1987, Male Daughters, Female Husbands: Gender and Sex in an African Society
- 1994, Inheritance in Zimbabwe: Laws, Customs and Practices
- Nyamu, 2000, How should human rights and development respond to cultural legitimization of gender hierarchy in developing countries?, Harvard International Law Journal, 41, 381
- 10.1017/S0165070X06000635 · DOI
- Cadigan, 1998, Woman-to-woman marriage: practices and benefits in Sub-Saharan Africa, Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 29, 89, 10.3138/jcfs.29.1.89 · DOI
- Eekelaar, 1998, The Changing Family: International Perspectives on the Family and Family Law
- Tripp, 2000, The Politics of Women’s Rights and Cultural Diversity in Uganda
- 10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387 · DOI
- Hellum, 2007, Human Rights, Plural Legalities and Gendered Realities: Paths are Made by Walking
- 1987, S.M. Otieno: Kenya’s Unique Burial Saga
- Nhlapo, The African customary law of marriage and the rights conundrum, Beyond Rights Talk and Culture Talk, 136
- 10.1080/03057070500493720 · DOI
- Moore, 1978, Law as Process: An Anthropological Approach
- Merry, 2006, Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice
- An-Na’im, 2002, Cultural Transformation and Human Rights in Africa
- Hellum, 2011, From Transnational Relations to Transnational Laws: Northern European Law at the Crossroads
- Kenyatta, 1965, Facing Mount Kenya: The Traditional Life of the Gikuyu
- Musembi, 2002, The International Survey of Family Law
- Hirsch, 1994, Contested States: Law, Hegemony and Resistance
- 1995, Picking up the Pieces: Widowhood in Southern Africa
- Ghai, 1970, Public Law and Political Change in Kenya: A Study of the Legal Framework of Government from Colonial Times to the Present
- Okech-Owiti, 1995, Research Report on Inheritance Laws and Practices in Kenya
- 10.1353/hrq.2002.0021 · DOI
- Musembi, 2003, Why engage with local norms and institutions? The case of women’s property rights in rural Kenya, East African Journal of Peace and Human Rights, 9, 255
- 10.1017/S0021223700000388 · DOI
- O’Brien, 1977, Sexual Stratification: A Cross-Cultural View
Cited by
The Coloniality and Evolution of African Customary Law
Gayoye, M. (2025) · Oñati Socio-Legal Series · doi:10.35295/osls.iisl.1976 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Musembi, C. N.
- Corresponding author
- Musembi, Celestine Nyamu
- Venue
- Women's Human Rights
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2013-07-11
- Pages
- 183-214
- OpenAlex
- W1600682805
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 2.94
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
- Social Sciences › Law › Discrimination and Equality Law
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies
- Keywords
- CEDAW, Maputo Protocol, pluralism, religious freedom, freedom of conscience, human rights treaties, comparative human rights law
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pulling apart? Treatment of pluralism in the CEDAW and the Maputo Protocol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9781139540841.009
- The paper
- Musembi, C. N. (2013). Pulling apart? Treatment of pluralism in the CEDAW and the Maputo Protocol. Women's Human Rights. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139540841.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
