The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Contesting International Society in East Asia
Abstract
Bringing together some of the most innovative scholars in both the English School of international relations and East Asian studies, this volume investigates whether or not significant and distinct international social structures exist at the regional level represented by 'East Asia', and what this can tell us about international society both regionally and globally. The book's main finding is that the regional dispute over how its states and peoples should relate to the Western-dominated global international society makes the existence of East Asian international society essentially contested. While this regional-global social dynamic is present in many regions, it is particularly strong in East Asia. This book will appeal to audiences interested in developing English School theory, the study of East Asian international relations and comparative regionalism.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While there is ' nothing in English School ' s classical literature stands against a regional approach to international society ' , its implicit emphasis on excessive universalism has prevented it from engaging in the complexity of regional and local histories (Buzan and Zhang 2014).”
From Imagining the Middle East: the state, nationalism and regional international society (2015) · cites this paper as Buzan and Zhang 2014
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Why is there no Non-Western International Relations Theory? Ten years on
Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. G. (2017) · International Relations of the Asia-Pacific · doi:10.1093/irap/lcx006 · Cited by 198
Self-citationAlliance theory and alliance ‘Shelter’: the complexities of small state alliance behaviour
Bailes, A. J. K., Thayer, B. A., & Þórhallsson, B. (2016) · Third World Thematics A TWQ Journal · doi:10.1080/23802014.2016.1189806 · Cited by 100
The English School: A neglected approach to International Security Studies
Buzan, B. G. (2015) · Security Dialogue · doi:10.1177/0967010614555944 · Cited by 70
Self-citationThe International Relations of East Asia: A New Research Prospectus
Foot, R., & Goh, E. (2018) · International Studies Review · doi:10.1093/isr/viy015 · Cited by 55
Self-citationAuthoritarianism as an Institution? The Case of Central Asia
Buranelli, F. C. (2020) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isq/sqaa058 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Buzan, B. G., Zhang, Y., Ba, A. D., Beeson, M., Breslin, S. G., Foot, R., Goh, E., Kang, D. C., Khong, Y. F., Suzuki, S., & Zhang, F.
- Affiliations
- London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2014-10-16
- OpenAlex
- W1495678207
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6
- FWCI
- 8.40
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Peace and Security Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Science Research and Education
- Keywords
- international society, East Asia, English schools, regionalism, regional international relations, comparative regionalism, Western hegemony
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
