CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 223Publishing and Scholarly CommunicationAcademic Publishing and Open AccessLibrary Science and Information

Open Access and the Humanities: Contexts, Controversies and the Future

Open access
Eve, Martin Paul·2014·Cambridge University Press eBooks
DOI 10.1017/cbo9781316161012

Published version of a preprint

Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

If you work in a university, you are almost certain to have heard the term 'open access' in the past couple of years. You may also have heard either that it is the utopian answer to all the problems of research dissemination or perhaps that it marks the beginning of an apocalyptic new era of 'pay-to-say' publishing. In this book, Martin Paul Eve sets out the histories, contexts and controversies for open access, specifically in the humanities. Broaching practical elements alongside economic histories, open licensing, monographs and funder policies, this book is a must-read for both those new to ideas about open-access scholarly communications and those with an already keen interest in the latest developments for the humanities. This title is also available as Open Access via Cambridge Books Online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9781316161012

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The natural sciences literature has often been more proactive in adopting the DOI system than the humanities.

    “where the natural sciences literature has often been more proactive in adopting the DOI system of referencing and linking to scholarly works than the humanities.”

    From Evaluation of Large Language Model Performance and Reliability for Citations and References in Scholarly Writing: Cross-Disciplinary Study (2024) · cites this paper as [21]

    The ‘Open access: scientific origins’ section (page unavailable) discusses differences between humanities and science publishing and says citation serves broadly similar purposes in both fields. It does not address comparative adoption of the DOI system. Searches for DOI-based referencing, digital object identifiers, and disciplinary adoption found no passage establishing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Differences in DOI standards and disciplinary nuances contribute to performance variations.

    “The discrepancies in the DOI existence and accuracy in the two domains may be attributed to the differential adoption and availability of DOIs across academic disciplines, where the natural sciences literature has often been more proactive in adopting the DOI system of referencing and linking to scholarly works than the humanities.”

    From Evaluation of Large Language Model Performance and Reliability for Citations and References in Scholarly Writing: Cross-Disciplinary Study (2024) · cites this paper as [21]

    The ‘Open access: scientific origins’ section acknowledges differences between humanities and science practices, but says their uses of citation are broadly similar. Our copy does not address whether the disciplines differ in DOI adoption or availability, or whether such differences explain DOI existence and accuracy; searches for DOI and persistent identifiers found no relevant passage. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Journals publishing natural sciences frequently mandate DOI inclusion, whereas publishers in humanities have been slower to adopt such standards.

    “It is a general practice that journals publishing on the natural sciences frequently mandate DOI inclusion, whereas publishers in the humanities have been slower to adopt such standards [21,22].”

    From Evaluation of Large Language Model Performance and Reliability for Citations and References in Scholarly Writing: Cross-Disciplinary Study (2024) · cites this paper as [21]

    The “Open access: scientific origins” section says some scholar-led venues do not follow discoverability standards, but it does not identify DOI inclusion as one of those standards. The copy discusses slower growth of open access in the humanities, not whether natural-science journals mandate DOIs or humanities publishers adopted them later. Searches for “DOI” and “digital object identifiers” found no passage addressing that comparison. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 217

  1. Neil Selwyn, 'Editorial: In Praise of Pessimism -the Need for Negativity in Educational Technology', British Journal of Educational Technology, 42 (2011), 713-18 (p. 167) http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ j.1467-8535.2011.01215.x. · DOI
  2. Nigel Vincent and Chris Wickham, 'Debating Open Access: Introduc- tion', in Debating Open Access, ed. Nigel Vincent and Chris Wickham (London: British Academy, 2013), pp. 4-12 (p. 6).
  3. Sara L. Rizor and Robert P. Holley, 'Open Access Goals Revisited: How Green and Gold Open Access Are Meeting (or Not) Their Original Goals', Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 45 (2014), 321-35 (p. 329) http:// dx.doi.org/10.3138/jsp.45.4.01. · DOI
  4. As with any manner of digital resource (for scholarship must now be thought of in such a way), it is never simply that there is one single way of funding its production, dissemination and continued existence. Although, as will be seen, dominant models are emerging, a relatively recent Ithaka report noted that 'There is no formulaic answer or single approach to achieving sustainability.' Kevin Guthrie, Rebecca Griffiths and Nancy Maron, Sustainability and Revenue Models for Online Aca- demic Resources (New York: Ithaka, 2008) www.jisc.ac.uk/media/docu- ments/events/2010/04/ithakasustainabilityreport.pdf [accessed 4 May 2014]; Suber, Open Access, p. 53. 17 Directory of Open Access Journals, 'Journals by Publication Charges' www.doaj.org/doaj?func=byPublicationFee&uiLanguage=en [accessed 20 January 2014].
  5. Kathleen Fitzpatrick, Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy (New York University Press, 2011), p. 122.
  6. Robert Darnton, The Business of Enlight- enment: A Publishing History of the Encyclopédie, 1775-1800 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987); The Book History Reader, ed.
  7. Michael Bhaskar, The Content Machine: Towards a Theory of Publishing from the Printing Press to the Digital Network (New York: Anthem Press, 2013).
  8. Martin Paul Eve, 'Tear It Down, Build It Up: The Research Output Team, or the Library-as-Publisher', Insights: The UKSG Journal, 25 (2012), 158-62 http://dx.doi.org/10.1629/ 2048-7754.25.2.158. · DOI
  9. Stephen Bosch and Kittie Henderson, 'Periodicals Price Survey 2013', Library Journal, 2013 http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2013/04/publishing/ the-winds-of-change-periodicals-price-survey-2013/ [accessed 6 May 2013].
  10. See, for contrasting views on the relative degree of dysfunction, Martin Paul Eve, 'Utopia Fading: Taxonomies, Freedom and Dissent in Open Access Publishing', Journal of Victorian Culture, 18 (2013), 536-42 (p. 538) http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13555502.2013.865979; · DOI
  11. Peter Mandler, 'Open Access for the Humanities: Not for Funders, Scientists or Publishers', Journal of Victorian Culture, 18 (2013), 551-7 (p. 557) http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13555502.2013.865981. · DOI
  12. For more on the expansion of higher education, see Thomas Docherty, For the University: Democracy and the Future of the Institution (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2011), p. 136.
  13. This phenomenon is exemplified in the UK's Research Excellence Framework (REF) and its predecessors, the Research Assessment Exer- cises; Australia's Excellence in Research for Australia; and the brutal and infamous tenure-track appointment system in the States. Key Perspec- tives Ltd, A Comparative Review of Research Assessment Regimes in Five Countries and the Role of Libraries in the Research Assessment Process: A Pilot Study Commissioned by OCLC Research (Dublin, OH: OCLC, 2009) www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/library/2009/ 2009-09.pdf?urlm=162926 [accessed 19 January 2014].
  14. For more on the rhetoric of utility, see Humanities in the Twenty-First Century beyond Utility and Markets., ed. Eleonora Belfiore and Anna Upchurch (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).
  15. Richard Stallman, 'Misinterpreting Copyright: A Series of Errors', in Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard Stallman (Boston, MA: Free Software Foundation, 2010), pp. 111-20 (p. 113).
  16. See Suber, Open Access, pp. 9-15.
  17. There are also a small proportion of academic authors who do make substantial money out of their book sales. These are by no means the majority, though. 46 Bhaskar, The Content Machine, pp. 103-36.
  18. See Suber, Open Access, pp. 86-90 for a note on why the term 'mandate' is problematic, though.
  19. Helen Small, The Value of the Humanities (Oxford University Press, 2013), p. 30.
  20. Jerome McGann, A New Republic of Letters (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014), p. 4.
  21. John B. Thompson, Books in the Digital Age: The Transformation of Academic and Higher Education Publishing in Britain and the United States (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005), p. 6.
  22. Hannah Arendt, The Human Condition (University of Chicago Press, 1998), p. 155; see also Elizabeth Markovits, The Politics of Sincerity: Plato, Frank Speech, and Democratic Judgment (University Park, PA: Penn State Press, 2008), p. 57, which first reminded me of this part of Arendt's thought.
  23. See, of course, C. P. Snow, The Two Cultures, Canto edn (Cambridge University Press, 1993).
  24. ROAPE Editors, 'Yes to Egalitarian "Open Access", No to "Pay to Publish": A ROAPE Position Statement on Open Access', Review of African Political Economy, 40 (2013), 177-8 (p. 177) http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/03056244.2013.797757. · DOI
  25. Peter Mandler, 'Open Access: A Perspective from the Humanities', Insights: The UKSG Journal, 27 (2014), 166-70 (p. 168) http://dx.doi. org/10.1629/2048-7754.89. 70 Mandler, 'Open Access for the Humanities', p. 556. · DOI
  26. See Andrew McGettigan, The Great University Gamble: Money, Markets and the Future of Higher Education (London: Pluto Press, 2013), pp. 79-95.
  27. I use the term 'left-spectrum' here for those OA advocates who wish to eradicate the profit motive from scholarly communications. 75 Bob Grant, 'Elsevier Abandons Anti-Open Access Bill', The Scientist, 2012 www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/31798/title/ Elsevier-Abandons-Anti-Open-Access-Bill/ [accessed 21 January 2014].
  28. Heather Morrison, 'Taylor & Francis Open Access Survey: Critique', The Imaginary Journal of Poetic Economics, 2013 http://poeticeconomics. blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/taylor-francis-open-access-survey.html [accessed 21 January 2014];
  29. Taylor & Francis, 'Open Access Survey', 2013 www.tandfonline.com/page/openaccess/opensurvey [accessed 21 January 2014].
  30. While Peter Mandler claims that the situation in the humanities is one wherein journals are less frequently owned by large commercial entities, I am unaware of any actual surveys that measure this and the prevalence of mega-presses seems to contradict such a view. Mandler, 'Open Access: A Perspective from the Humanities'. 84 For more on mergers in the book world, see Thompson, Books in the Digital Age, pp. 54-64.
  31. Bloomsbury Group, Annual Report, 2012, p.
  32. Jane Park, 'An Interview with Frances Pinter of Bloomsbury Academic', 2008 http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/10100 [accessed 22 January 2014].
  33. Friedman's doctrine that shareholder profit is the only social factor for which businesses should be held responsible is widely disseminated and equally widely criticised. See Milton Friedman, 'The Social Responsi- bility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits', The New York Times Magazine, 13 September 1970, pp. 32-3, 122-4.
  34. PLOS, 'Written Evidence to House of Commons Select Committee Inquiry', in Inquiry into Open Access: Fifth Report of Session 2013-2014, by House of Commons Business, Innovation and Skills Committee (London: House of Commons, 2013), pp. Ev80-Ev87 (p. 83). 91 For more on symbolic capital in book publishing, see Thompson, Books in the Digital Age, pp. 32-4.
  35. Bergstrom and Bergstrom, 'Can "author pays" journals compete with "reader pays"?' 93 Linguistic Society of America, 'Journal Sponsorship', Semantics and Pragmatics, 2014 http://semprag.org/about/journalSponsorship [accessed 22 January 2014].
  36. Amherst College Press, 'Frequently Asked Questions', 2014 www. amherst.edu/library/press/faq [accessed 22 January 2014].
  37. Martyn Wade, 'Thriving or Surviving? National Libraries in the Future' (presented at the RLUK Conference, Edinburgh, 2010) www.rluk.ac.uk/files/Martyn%20Wade%20-%202010%20Conf.pdf;
  38. Frances Pinter and Christopher Kenneally, 'Publishing Pioneer Seeks Knowledge Unlatched', 2013 http://beyondthebookcast.com/ transcripts/publishing-pioneer-seeks-knowledge-unlatched/; Nancy Kranich, 'From Collecting to Connecting: Engaging the Academic Community' (presented at The Library in the Digital Age: Commu- nities, Collections, Opportunities, Temple University, 2013). 105 See also John Bohannon's 'sting' and the retorts from its critics: John Bohannon, 'Who's Afraid of Peer Review?', Science, 342 (2013), 60-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.342.6154.60; Martin Paul Eve, 'Flawed Sting Operation Singles out Open Access Journals', The Con- versation, 2013 http://theconversation.com/flawed-sting-operation- singles-out-open-access-journals-18846 [accessed 23 January 2014]; · DOI · Paper page
  39. Amy Buckland and others, 'On the Mark? Responses to a Sting', Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 2 (2013) http:// dx.doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1116. 106 · DOI
  40. Jeffrey Beall, 'The Open-Access Movement Is Not Really about Open Access', tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 11 (2013), 589-97 (p. 589);
  41. Wayne Bivens-Tatum, 'Reactionary Rhetoric against Open Access Pub- lishing', tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Jour- nal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 12 (2014), 441-6 (pp. 442-3).
  42. Michael Jensen, 'Authority 3.0: Friend or Foe to Scholars?', Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 39 (2007), 297-307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/scp.2007.0027. · DOI
  43. Pierre Bourdieu, Outline of a Theory of Practice (Cambridge University Press, 1977), p. 180.
  44. It is, of course, possible to put technological counter-measures in place to combat this type of technological cheating. However, this then becomes a game of catch-up, much like search engine optimisation practices, wherein those who are behaving badly ('black hats') are simply trying to stay one step ahead of the counter-measures. 10 See Fitzpatrick, Planned Obsolescence, pp. 27-30.
  45. See Bhaskar, The Content Machine, pp. 131-4 for more on amplification in publishing.
  46. Samuel Weber, Institution and Interpretation, Cultural Memory in the Present, expanded edn (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2001), p. 27. 14 Weber, Institution and Interpretation, pp. 32-3. 15 Weber, Institution and Interpretation, pp. 132-52.
  47. Bill Readings, The University in Ruins (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Uni- versity Press, 1996), pp. 2-3.
  48. Keith Hoeller, 'The Academic Labor System of Faculty Apartheid', in Equality for Contingent Faculty: Overcoming the Two-Tier System, ed. Keith Hoeller (Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 2014), pp. 116-55 (p. 117).
  49. Suber, Open Access, p. 10. 23 'Submit to SAGE Open today to lock in the $99 APC before the price goes up!' 24 Stuart Lawson, 'APC Pricing', 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9. figshare.1056280 [accessed 13 June 2014]; see also David J. Solomon and Bo-Christer Björk, 'A Study of Open Access Journals Using Article Processing Charges', Journal of the American Society for Infor- mation Science and Technology, 63 (2012), 1485-95 http://dx.doi. org/10.1002/asi.22673 for an older study. 25 Palgrave Macmillan, 'Frequently Asked Questions', Palgrave Open, 2013 www.palgrave.com/open/faq.asp#section2 [accessed 21 December 2013]. · DOI
  50. Benjamin Ginsberg, The Fall of the Faculty: The Rise of the All- Administrative University and Why It Matters (Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 131-2.
  51. Amy E. Wendling, Karl Marx on Technology and Alienation (Basing- stoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), p. 52.
  52. Michael Bérubé, 'The Futility of the Humanities', in Humanities in the Twenty-First Century: Beyond Utility and Markets, ed. Eleonora Belfiore and Anna Upchurch (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013), pp. 66-76.
  53. As Benjamin Ginsberg points out, there are ways in which all forms of research income grants are desired for universities as sites of direct value extraction from research work, even in the humanities. Ginsberg, The Fall of the Faculty, pp. 180-97.
  54. Raymond Hogler and Michael A. Gross, 'Journal Rankings and Aca- demic Research: Two Discourses about the Quality of Faculty Work', Management Communication Quarterly, 23 (2009), 107-26 (p. 111) http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0893318909335419. · DOI
  55. Hogler and Gross, 'Journal Rankings and Academic Research', pp. 119-21.
  56. For more see Thompson, Books in the Digital Age, p. 21. 44 Joss Winn, 'Is an Open Access Journal Article a Commodity?', Joss Winn, 2014 http://josswinn.org/2014/02/is-an-open-access-journal-art- icle-a-commodity/ [accessed 15 February 2014].
  57. For the explanation of the BBB definition, see above, p. 21. 46 Suber, Open Access, pp. 20-7. 47 Suber, Open Access, pp. 149-61.
  58. Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers, 'ALPSP Survey of Librarians on Factors in Journal Cancellation', 2006. 50 Suber, Open Access, p. 158.
  59. Jingfeng Xia and others, 'A Review of Open Access Self-Archiving Man- date Policies', Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 12 (2012), 85-102 (p. 98).
  60. Taylor & Francis, 'Information for Funders & Institutions', 2014 www. tandfonline.com/page/openaccess/funders [accessed 11 May 2014].
  61. For a parallel in the sphere of online music distribution, see Aleksandr Dolgin, The Economics of Symbolic Exchange (Berlin: Springer, 2009), pp. 32-40.
  62. arXiv, 'FAQ', 2013 http://arxiv.org/help/support/faq [accessed 22 December 2013].
  63. Rebecca Bliege Bird and Eric Alden Smith, 'Signaling Theory, Strategic Interaction, and Symbolic Capital 1', Current Anthropology, 46 (2005), 221-48 (p. 221).
  64. arXiv, 'FAQ'. 73 arXiv, 'FAQ'. 74 Science Europe, 'Principles for the Transition to Open Access to Research Publications', 2013 www.scienceeurope.org/uploads/ PublicDocumentsAndSpeeches/SE_OA_Pos_Statement.pdf [accessed 17 May 2014].
  65. Richard Van Noorden, 'Chinese Agencies Announce Open-Access Policies', Nature, 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature.2014.15255. · DOI
  66. Dehua Hu, Aijing Luo and Haixia Liu, 'Open Access in China and Its Effect on Academic Libraries', Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39 (2013), 110-12 (p. 110) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2012.11.009. · DOI
  67. Leila Fernandez, 'Open Access Initiatives in India -an Evaluation', Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 1 (2006) https://journal.lib.uoguelph.ca/index.php/perj/ article/view/110 [accessed 19 May 2014].
  68. Matthew K. Gold (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2012), pp. 16-35 (p. 24).
  69. Charles W. Bailey Jr, 'Strong Copyright + DRM + Weak Net Neutrality = Digital Dystopia?', Information Technology and Libraries, 25 (2013), 116-27, 139 (p. 117) http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v25i3.3344. · DOI
  70. See Lee Edwards and others, '"Isn't It Just a Way to Protect Walt Disney's Rights?": Media User Perspectives on Copyright', New Media & Society, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444813511402. · DOI
  71. See, for instance, Palgrave Macmillan Journals, 'Copyright FAQs', 2014 www.palgrave-journals.com/pal/authors/copyright_faqs.html [accessed 22 February 2014].
  72. Richard Stallman, 'Why Open Source Misses the Point of Free Soft- ware', in Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard Stallman (Boston, MA: Free Software Foundation, 2010), pp. 83-8.
  73. Paul Duguid, 'Material Matters: The Past and Futorology of the Book', in The Future of the Book, ed. Geoffrey Nunberg (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996), pp. 63-101 (p. 74).
  74. It is extremely difficult to work out exactly how much the CLA license costs each institution in the UK, but the yearly charge that would allow a researcher to photocopy one chapter of a recent book for distribution to students is £A/B Â C Â 38.50 (where 'A' is the Licensee's income from UK industry, commerce and public corporations; 'B' is the total income of the Licensee; and 'C' is the full-time equivalent number of academic staff). Copyright Licensing Agency, 'Comprehensive HE Licence 1 August 2010', 2010 www.cla.co.uk/data/pdfs/he/uuk_basic_ he_licence_specimen.pdf [accessed 23 April 2014]. The variance in cost between institutions is large and depends heavily upon the corporate revenue ratio. An estimated figure of £10,000 per year, however, is not unrealistic. Taking, for instance, the figures for Durham University in 2012/2013: A in this case is 57,334,000 (3,783,000 ('UK industries') + 35,789,000 (residences and catering), 6,487,000 ('other services rendered'), 11,275,000 ('other income')). B is 283,379,000. C is approxi- mately 1,250 from UK HESA statistics. This yields a cost of £9,737 per year (57,334,000/283,379,000 Â 1,250 Â 38.50). Durham University, 'Annual Accounts 2013', 2014, pp. 24, 29, 30 www.dur.ac.uk/resources/ treasurer/financial_statements/Accounts13.pdf [accessed 4 July 2014]. Although a drop in the ocean for an individual institution's budget, open licensing would circumvent the restrictions on quantity imposed here and also avoid the costs because anybody would have permission to redistribute the work. 19 Suber, Open Access, pp. 73-4.
  75. See, for instance, Theresa Lillis, 'Economies of Signs in Writing for Academic Publication: The Case of English Medium "National" Jour- nals', Journal of Advanced Composition, 32 (2012), 695-722.
  76. John Willinsky, The Access Principle: The Case for Open Access to Research and Scholarship, Digital Libraries and Electronic Publishing (Cam- bridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006), pp. 155-71.
  77. Christopher M. Kelty, Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2008), p. 3. Emphasis in original.
  78. Klaus Graf and Sanford Thatcher, 'Point & Counterpoint: Is CC BY the Best Open Access License?', Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 1 (2012), 2 http://dx.doi.org/http/10.7710/ 2162-3309.1043. · DOI
  79. Mark Philp, 'Foucault on Power: A Problem in Radical Translation?', Political Theory, 11 (1983), 29-52 (p. 33). Google, 'Ngram Viewer', 2013 https://books.google.com/ngrams/ [accessed 5 March 2014].
  80. Taylor & Francis, 'Open Access Survey', 2014 www.tandfonline.com/ page/openaccess/opensurvey/2014 [accessed 21 January 2014];
  81. Morrison, 'Taylor & Francis Open Access Survey: Critique'; Heinrich Mallison, 'Taylor & Francis Misrepresents DFG Guidelines on Open Access -an Innocent Error?', dinosaurpalaeo, 2014 https://dinosaurpa- laeo.wordpress.com/2014/04/20/taylor-franics-misrepresents-dfg-guide- lines-on-open-access-an-innocent-error/ [accessed 20 April 2014].
  82. Lawrence Lessig, Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy (New York: Penguin Press, 2008), p. 18.
  83. Richard Stallman, 'Why Software Should Not Have Owners', in Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard Stallman (Boston, MA: Free Software Foundation, 2010), pp. 37-41 (p. 39). 32 Lessig, Remix, pp. 34-5. ]rite your own work'. Mandler, 'Open Access: A Perspective from the Humanities', p. 169. 34 Editors of History Journals, 'Written Evidence'; Mandler, 'Open Access for the Humanities'.
  84. Aaron Keyt, 'An Improved Framework for Music Plagiarism Litigation', California Law Review, 76 (1988), 421-64 (p. 422).
  85. Dingwall, 'Why Open Access Is Good News for Neo-Nazis'. 43 Small, The Value of the Humanities, p. 59. 44 Small, The Value of the Humanities, pp. 174-5.
  86. John Holmwood, A Manifesto for the Public University (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2011) http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781849666459 [accessed 3 March 2014]. · DOI
  87. Domna C. Stanton, 'Working through the Crises: A Plan for Action', Profession, 2004, 32-41; Thompson, Books in the Digital Age, pp. 103-7;
  88. Jerome McGann, 'Information Technology and the Troubled Humanities', Text Technology, 14 (2005), 105 if you would really like to read more on this.
  89. Colin Steele, 'Scholarly Monograph Publishing in the 21st Century: The Future More Than Ever Should Be an Open Book', Journal of Electronic Publishing, 11 (2008) http://dx.doi.org/http/10.3998/ 3336451.0011.201; · DOI
  90. John Willinsky, 'Toward the Design of an Open Monograph Press', Journal of Electronic Publishing, 12 (2009) http:// dx.doi.org/http/10.3998/3336451.0012.103. · DOI
  91. Ellen Collins, 'OAPEN-UK Literature Review V1', 2012 http://oapen- uk.jiscebooks.org/files/2012/06/OAPENUK-Literature-Review-V1-June- 2012.doc [accessed 14 March 2014].
  92. David Nicholas and others, 'E-Journals: Their Use, Value and Impact: Final Report' (Research Information Network, 2009), pp. 20-1 www. rin.ac.uk/our-work/communicating-and-disseminating-research/e-jour- nals-their-use-value-and-impact.
  93. Adema and Rutten, 'Digital Monographs in the Humanities and Social Sciences', p. 13. 14 Collins, 'OAPEN-UK Literature Review V1', p. 2.
  94. Hazel Newton, 'Breaking Boundaries in Academic Publishing: Launch- ing a New Format for Scholarly Research', Insights: The UKSG Journal, 26 (2013), 70-6 (p. 71) http://dx.doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.26.1.70. · DOI
  95. At a risk of a technical digression too far, XML is a markup language in which information is encoded alongside its metadata. For instance, <lastname>Smith<lastname> might be the way in which the word 'Smith' is signalled as an author's last name inside such a document. The most common format for encoding of scholarly documents is the Journal Article Tag Suite (JATS), which, despite its name, can also handle books (although there is also a parallel format). Such a format serves as an intermediary stage in a three-step plan: (1) authors submit in a format of their choice; (2) this is then converted to the intermediate XML; (3) which is then, itself, converted into all the various desired output formats (PDF, EPUB, MOBI, HTML etc.). Stage 2 is difficult (and expensive as this software can often cost tens of thousands of US dollars per year to license), but it then enables a far easier and unified process at stage 3 whereby all the outputs are created from a single, easily readable source. Martin Paul Eve, 'The Means of (Re-)Production: Expertise, Open Tools, Standards and Communication', Publications, 2 (2014), 38-43 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/publications2010038. · DOI
  96. G. Dean Kortge and Patrick A. Okonkwo, 'Perceived Value Approach to Pricing', Industrial Marketing Management, 22 (1993), 133-40 http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/0019-8501(93)90039-A. · DOI
  97. Kristina Shampanier, Nina Mazar and Dan Ariely, 'Zero as a Special Price: The True Value of Free Products', Marketing Science, 26 (2007), 742-57 http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1060.0254; · DOI · Paper page
  98. Mauricio M. Pal- meira and Joydeep Srivastava, 'Free Offer 6 ¼ Cheap Product: A Selective Accessibility Account on the Valuation of Free Offers', Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (2013), 644-56 http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1086/671565. · DOI · Paper page
  99. By which I mean that the typesetting is done digitally and print is derived from this same source. 24 For more on these costs in the journal sphere, see Brian D. Edgar and John Willinsky, 'A Survey of Scholarly Journals Using Open Journal Systems', Scholarly and Research Communication, 1 (2010) http://src- online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/24 [accessed 1 May 2014].
  100. Ferwerda, Snijder and Adema, 'OAPEN-NL', pp. 55-7; Swan, 'The Open Access Citation Advantage'. 29
  101. Ferwerda, Snijder and Adema, 'OAPEN-NL', pp. 40-53.
  102. Ferwerda, Snijder and Adema, 'OAPEN-NL', p. 83. 31 OAPEN-UK, 'The Pilot', 2013 http://oapen-uk.jiscebooks.org/pilot/ [accessed 25 March 2014]. There is some confusion around the numbers here. Technically, there were 29 original matched pairs (yielding 58 titles), which were then to be joined by a further 18 pairs from Oxford University Press (adding a further 36), making a total of 94. However, four titles remain listed as 'TBC'. 32 Disclosure of interest: I am a member of the OAPEN-UK project's steering group.
  103. OAPEN-UK, 'Year 1 Focus Group Summary Report', p. 3. 36 Fitzpatrick, Planned Obsolescence, pp. 122-3.
  104. Donald J. Waters, 'Preserving the Knowledge Commons', in Under- standing Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice, ed. Charlotte Hess and Elinor Ostrom (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007), pp. 145-67.
  105. G. R. Evans, 'Questions over Open Books', Times Higher Education, 29 May 2014, sec. Letters. 47 Palgrave Macmillan, 'Frequently Asked Questions'.
  106. Gary Hall, Digitize This Book! The Politics of New Media, or Why We Need Open Access Now (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008).
  107. Gary Hall, 'Towards a New Political Economy: Open Humanities Press and the Open Access Monograph' (presented at the OAPEN 2011: The First OAPEN (Open Access Publishing in European Networks) Conference, Humboldt University Berlin, Germany, 2011) www.garyhall.info/journal/2011/5/30/towards-a-new-political- economy-open-humanities-press-and-th.html [accessed 29 March 2014].
  108. Andrew Albanese, 'Pitt Library and Press Join Forces to Expand Digital Backlist', Library Journal, 2007 http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2007/ 12/academic-libraries/pitt-library-and-press-join-forces-to-expand-digital- backlist/ [accessed 29 March 2014].
  109. Athabasca University Press, 'About', 2014 www.aupress.ca/index.php/ about/ [accessed 29 March 2014].
  110. For the costs incurred at various points in the publishing cycle, see Thompson, Books in the Digital Age, pp. 16-20.
  111. Hugh Look and Frances Pinter, 'Open Access and Humanities and Social Science Monograph Publishing', New Review of Academic Librarianship, 16 (2010), 90-7 (p. 95) http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2010.512244. · DOI
  112. Look and Pinter, 'Open Access and Humanities and Social Science Monograph Publishing', p. 91. 62 Lucy Montgomery, 'Knowledge Unlatched Pilot Collection to Become Open Access -Nearly 300 Libraries Globally Pledge Their Support' (Knowledge Unlatched, 2014) www.knowledgeunlatched.org/press- release/ [accessed 30 March 2014].
  113. Lucy Montgomery, 'Knowledge Unlatched Announces the Launch of Its Pilot Collection' (Knowledge Unlatched, 2013) www.knowledgeun- latched.org/press-release/ [accessed 30 March 2014].
  114. Adrian Johns, The Nature of the Book (Illinois: University of Chicago Press, 1998), p. 450 www. press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/N/bo3645773.html [accessed 30 March 2014]. Ellipses are Thatcher's.
  115. Gluejar, 'Vision', 2014 http://gluejar.com/vision/ [accessed 30 March 2014]. 5 innovations 1 Suber, Open Access, pp. 20-1.
  116. Michel Foucault, 'What Is Enlightenment?', in Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth: The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984 (London: Penguin, 2000), pp. 303-19 (p. 316).
  117. Hall, Digitize This Book!, pp. 59-61.
  118. Domenic V. Cicchetti, 'The Reliability of Peer Review for Manuscript and Grant Submissions: A Cross-Disciplinary Investigation', Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14 (1991), 119-35.
  119. PLOS, 'PLOS ONE Journal Information' www.plosone.org/static/ information [accessed 6 May 2013].
  120. Willinsky, The Access Principle, p. 203. Note that Biagioli ('From Book Censorship to Academic Peer Review') argues that peer review developed at an earlier stage than the conventionally held point of the Transactions and has roots instead in the seventeenth-century book trade. 12 Fitzpatrick, Planned Obsolescence, p. 196. 13 Fitzpatrick, Planned Obsolescence, pp. 110-12, 192.
  121. Palgrave Macmillan, 'Introduction', Palgrave Macmillan: Open Peer Review Trial http://palgraveopenreview.com/introduction/ [accessed 4 April 2014].
  122. For more on the genesis of this type of logic, see Tim O'Reilly, 'Piracy Is Progressive Taxation, and Other Thoughts on the Evolution of Online Distribution', O'Reilly P2P, 2002 www.openp2p.com/pub/a/p2p/2002/ 12/11/piracy.html [accessed 21 April 2014]. Bibliography The Ad Hoc Committee on Fair Use and Academic Freedom, Clipping Our Own Wings: Copyright and Creativity in Communication Research (The Media and Communication Policy Task Force, 7 May 2010) www.cmsimpact.org/fair-use/related-materials/documents/clipping-our- own-wings-copyright-and-creativity-communication-r [accessed 1 May 2014
  123. Albanese, Andrew, 'Pitt Library and Press Join Forces to Expand Digital Backlist', Library Journal, 2007 http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2007/12/ academic-libraries/pitt-library-and-press-join-forces-to-expand-digital- backlist/ [accessed 29 March 2014]
  124. Arendt, Hannah, The Human Condition (University of Chicago Press, 1998) arXiv, 'FAQ', 2013 http://arxiv.org/help/support/faq [accessed 22 December 2013] Association of American Universities, and Association of Research Libraries, 'AAU-ARL Prospectus for an Institutionally Funded First-Book Subvention', 2014 www.arl.org/publications-resources/3280-aau-arl- prospectus-for-an-institutionally-funded-first-book-subvention [accessed July 2014] Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers, 'ALPSP Survey of Librarians on Factors in Journal Cancellation', 2006 Association of Research Libraries, 'ARL Statistics 2009-2011', 2014 www.arl. org/storage/documents/expenditure-trends.pdf [accessed 1 July 2014]
  125. Athabasca University Press, 'About', 2014 www.aupress.ca/index.php/ about/ [accessed 29 March 2014]
  126. Bailey Jr, Charles W., 'Strong Copyright + DRM + Weak Net Neutrality = Digital Dystopia?', Information Technology and Libraries, 25 (2013), 116-27, 139 http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v25i3.3344 · DOI
  127. Bazin, Patrick, 'Toward Metareading', in The Future of the Book, ed. Geoffrey Nunberg (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996), pp. 153-69
  128. Beall, Jeffrey, 'The Open-Access Movement Is Not Really about Open Access', tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 11 (2013), 589-97
  129. Belfiore, Eleonora, and Anna Upchurch, eds., Humanities in the Twenty- First Century Beyond Utility and Markets (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013)
  130. Bergstrom, Theodore C., and Carl T. Bergstrom, 'Can "Author Pays" Journals Compete with "Reader Pays"?', Nature: Web Focus, 2004 www.nature. com/nature/focus/accessdebate/22.html [accessed 1 May 2014] 'Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities', 2003 http://oa.mpg.de/lang/en-uk/berlin-prozess/ber- liner-erklarung
  131. Bérubé, Michael, 'The Futility of the Humanities', in Humanities in the Twenty-First Century: Beyond Utility and Markets, ed. Eleonora Belfiore and Anna Upchurch (Basingstoke: Palgrave/Macmillan, 2013), pp. 66-76
  132. Bhaskar, Michael, The Content Machine: Towards a Theory of Publishing from the Printing Press to the Digital Network (New York: Anthem Press, 2013)
  133. Bivens-Tatum, Wayne, 'Reactionary Rhetoric against Open Access Pub- lishing', tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 12 (2014), 441-6
  134. Bliege Bird, Rebecca, and Eric Alden Smith, 'Signaling Theory, Strategic Interaction, and Symbolic Capital 1', Current Anthropology, 46 (2005), 221-48
  135. Bloomsbury Group, Annual Report, 2012 www.bloomsbury-ir.co.uk/ annual_reports/2012/pdf/2012ar.pdf [accessed 22 January 2014]
  136. Bohannon, John, 'Who's Afraid of Peer Review?', Science, 342 (2013), 60-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.342.6154. · DOI · Paper page
  137. Bosch, Stephen, and Kittie Henderson, 'Periodicals Price Survey 2013', Library Journal, 2013 http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2013/04/publishing/ the-winds-of-change-periodicals-price-survey-2013/ [accessed 6 May 2013]
  138. Bourdieu, Pierre, Outline of a Theory of Practice (Cambridge University Press, 1977)
  139. Buckland, Amy, Martin Paul Eve, Graham Steel, Jennifer Gardy, and Dorothea Salo, 'On the Mark? Responses to a Sting', Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 2 (2013) http://dx.doi. org/10.7710/2162-3309.1116 · DOI
  140. Chartier, Roger, 'Libraries without Walls', Representations, 1993, 38-52 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2928617 · DOI
  141. Cicchetti, Domenic V., 'The Reliability of Peer Review for Manuscript and Grant Submissions: A Cross-Disciplinary Investigation', Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14 (1991), 119-35
  142. Collins, Ellen, 'OAPEN-UK Literature Review V1', 2012 http://oapen-uk. jiscebooks.org/files/2012/06/OAPENUK-Literature-Review-V1-June- 2012.doc [accessed 14 March 2014]
  143. Darnton, Robert, The Business of Enlightenment: A Publishing History of the Encyclopédie, 1775-1800 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987) 'What Is the History of Books?', Daedalus, 1982, 65-83
  144. Dingwall, Robert, 'Why Open Access Is Good News for Neo-Nazis', Social Science Space, 2012 www.socialsciencespace.com/2012/10/why-open- access-is-good-news-for-neo-nazis/ [accessed 1 March 2014] Directory of Open Access Journals, 'Journals by Publication Charges' www.doaj.org/doaj?func=byPublicationFee&uiLanguage=en [accessed 20 January 2014]
  145. Docherty, Thomas, For the University: Democracy and the Future of the Institution (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2011)
  146. Dolgin, Aleksandr, The Economics of Symbolic Exchange (Berlin: Springer, 2009)
  147. Duguid, Paul, 'Material Matters: The Past and Futorology of the Book', in The Future of the Book, ed. Geoffrey Nunberg (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996), pp. 63-101
  148. Ede, Lisa, and Andrea A. Lunsford, 'Collaboration and Concepts of Authorship', PMLA, 116 (2001), 354-69
  149. Edgar, Brian D., and John Willinsky, 'A Survey of Scholarly Journals Using Open Journal Systems', Scholarly and Research Communication, 1 (2010) http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/24 [accessed 1 May 2014] Editors of History Journals, 'Written Evidence', UK Parliament, 2013 www. publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmbis/writev/open- access/m44.htm [accessed 24 January 2014]
  150. Edwards, Lee, Bethany Klein, David Lee, Giles Moss, and Fiona Philip, '"Isn't It Just a Way to Protect Walt Disney's Rights?": Media User Perspectives on Copyright', New Media & Society, 2013, http:// dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444813511402 · DOI
  151. 'Tear It Down, Build It Up: The Research Output Team, or the Library- as-Publisher', Insights: The UKSG Journal, 25 (2012), 158-62 http://dx. doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.25.2.158 'The Means of (Re-)Production: Expertise, Open Tools, Standards and Communication', Publications, 2 (2014), 38-43 http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3390/publications2010038 'Utopia Fading: Taxonomies, Freedom and Dissent in Open Access Publishing', Journal of Victorian Culture, 18 (2013), 536-42 http://dx. doi.org/10.1080/13555502.2013.865979 · DOI
  152. Fernandez, Leila, 'Open Access Initiatives in India -an Evaluation', Part- nership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 1 (2006) https://journal.lib.uoguelph.ca/index.php/perj/art- icle/view/110 [accessed 19 May 2014]
  153. Finkelstein, David, and Alistair McCleery, eds., The Book History Reader, 2nd edn (Abingdon: Routledge, 2006)
  154. Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Acad- emy (New York: New York University Press, 2011)
  155. Foucault, Michel, 'What Is an Author?', in The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984, 3 vols. (London: Penguin, 2000), ii, pp. 205-22 'What Is Enlightenment?', in Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth: The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984 (London: Penguin, 2000), pp. 303-19
  156. Friedman, Milton, 'The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits', The New York Times Magazine, 13 September 1970, pp. 32-3, 122-4
  157. Ginsberg, Benjamin, The Fall of the Faculty: The Rise of the All- Administrative University and Why It Matters (Oxford University Press, 2013)
  158. Graf, Klaus, and Sanford Thatcher, 'Point & Counterpoint: Is CC BY the Best Open Access License?', Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 1 (2012) http://dx.doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1043 · DOI
  159. Grafton, Anthony, The Footnote: A Curious History (Cambridge, MA:Har- vard University Press, 1999)
  160. Grant, Bob, 'Elsevier Abandons Anti-Open Access Bill', The Scientist, 2012 www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/31798/title/Elsevier- Abandons-Anti-Open-Access-Bill/ [accessed 21 January 2014]
  161. Hall, Gary, Digitize This Book! The Politics of New Media, or Why We Need Open Access Now (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008) 'Towards a New Political Economy: Open Humanities Press and the Open Access Monograph' (presented at the OAPEN 2011: The First OAPEN (Open Access Publishing in European Networks) Confer- ence, Humboldt University Berlin, Germany, 2011) www.garyhall. info/journal/2011/5/30/towards-a-new-political-economy-open-human- ities-press-and-th.html [accessed 29 March 2014]
  162. Harnad, Stevan, 'Overture: A Subversive Proposal', in Scholarly Journals at the Crossroads: A Subversive Proposal for Electronic Publishing, ed. Shumelda Okerson and James J. O'Donnell (Washington, DC: Asso- ciation of Research Libraries, 1994), pp. 11-12 http://hdl.handle.net/ 2027/mdp.39015034923758 [accessed 8 May 2014]
  163. 'Pre Green-OA Fool's Gold vs. Post Green-OA Fair Gold', Open Access Archivangelism, 2013 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/arch- ives/1007-Pre-Green-OA-Fools-Gold-vs.-Post-Green-OA-Fair-Gold. html [accessed 17 May 2014] 'ROARMAP' http://roarmap.eprints.org/ [accessed 25 July 2014] 'Self-Archiving and Journal Subscriptions: Critique of PRC Study' http:// users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/5792.html [accessed July 2014]
  164. Henri, Agnès, 'EDP Open Survey Reveals Learned Society Attitudes towards Open Access', 2014 www.edp-open.org/index.php?option= com_content&view=article&id=273&lang=en_GB.utf8%2C+en_GB. UT [accessed 28 May 2014] Higher Education Funding Council for England, 'Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment', 2014 www.hefce.ac.uk/ whatwedo/rsrch/howfundr/metrics/ [accessed 21 June 2014] 'Policy for Open Access in the Post-2014 Research Excellence Frame- work', 2014 www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/pubs/2014/201407/ HEFCE2014_07.pdf
  165. Hoeller, Keith, 'The Academic Labor System of Faculty Apartheid', in Equality for Contingent Faculty: Overcoming the Two-Tier System, ed. Keith Hoel- ler (Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 2014), pp. 116-55
  166. Hogler, Raymond, and Michael A. Gross, 'Journal Rankings and Academic Research: Two Discourses about the Quality of Faculty Work', Man- agement Communication Quarterly, 23 (2009), 107-26 http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0893318909335419 · DOI
  167. Holmwood, John, A Manifesto for the Public University (London: Blooms- bury Academic, 2011) http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781849666459 [accessed 3 March 2014] 'Markets versus Dialogue: The Debate over Open Access Ignores Competing Philosophies of Openness.', Impact of Social Sciences, 2013 http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2013/10/21/markets- versus-dialogue/ [accessed 24 January 2014] · DOI
  168. Hu, Dehua, Aijing Luo, and Haixia Liu, 'Open Access in China and Its Effect on Academic Libraries', Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39 (2013), 110-12 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2012.11.009 · DOI
  169. Jensen, Michael, 'Authority 3.0: Friend or Foe to Scholars?', Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 39 (2007), 297-307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/ scp.2007.0027 Jisc, 'Publisher Copyright Policies & Self-Archiving', SHERPA/RoMEO www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/ [accessed 20 January 2014] 'Research Funders' Open Access Policies', SHERPA/JULIET, 2014 www. sherpa.ac.uk/juliet/index.php [accessed 26 February 2014] · DOI
  170. Kelty, Christopher M, Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2008)
  171. Key Perspectives Ltd, A Comparative Review of Research Assessment Regimes in Five Countries and the Role of Libraries in the Research Assessment Process: A Pilot Study Commissioned by OCLC Research (Dublin, OH: OCLC, 2009) www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/ library/2009/2009-09.pdf?urlm=162926 [accessed 19 January 2014]
  172. Keyt, Aaron, 'An Improved Framework for Music Plagiarism Litigation', California Law Review, 76 (1988), 421-64
  173. Kortge, G. Dean, and Patrick A. Okonkwo, 'Perceived Value Approach to Pricing', Industrial Marketing Management, 22 (1993), 133-40 http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/0019-8501(93)90039-A Kranich, Nancy, 'From Collecting to Connecting: Engaging the Academic Community' (presented at The Library in the Digital Age: Commu- nities, Collections, Opportunities, Temple University, 2013) · DOI
  174. Lessig, Lawrence, Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy (New York: Penguin Press, 2008)
  175. Lillis, Theresa, 'Economies of Signs in Writing for Academic Publication: The Case of English Medium "National" Journals', Journal of Advanced Composition, 32 (2012), 695-722 Linguistic Society of America, 'Journal Sponsorship', Semantics and Prag- matics, 2014 http://semprag.org/about/journalSponsorship [accessed 22 January 2014]
  176. Look, Hugh, and Frances Pinter, 'Open Access and Humanities and Social Science Monograph Publishing', New Review of Academic Librarian- ship, 16 (2010), 90-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2010.512244 · DOI
  177. Mallison, Heinrich, 'Taylor &Francis Misrepresents DFG Guidelines on Open Access -an Innocent Error?', dinosaurpalaeo, 2014 https://dino- saurpalaeo.wordpress.com/2014/04/20/taylor-franics-misrepresents-dfg- guidelines-on-open-access-an-innocent-error/ [accessed 20 April 2014]
  178. Mandler, Peter, 'Open Access: A Perspective from the Humanities', Insights: The UKSG Journal, 27 (2014), 166-70 http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1629/2048-7754.89 · DOI
  179. 'Open Access for the Humanities: Not for Funders, Scientists or Pub- lishers', Journal of Victorian Culture, 18 (2013), 551-7 http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/13555502.2013.865981 · DOI
  180. Markovits, Elizabeth, The Politics of Sincerity: Plato, Frank Speech, and Democratic Judgment (University Park, PA: Penn State Press, 2008)
  181. McGann, Jerome, A New Republic of Letters (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014) 'Information Technology and the Troubled Humanities', Text Technol- ogy, 14 (2005), 105-21
  182. McGettigan, Andrew, The Great University Gamble: Money, Markets and the Future of Higher Education (London: Pluto Press, 2013)
  183. Montgomery, Lucy, 'Knowledge Unlatched Announces the Launch of Its Pilot Collection' (Knowledge Unlatched, 2013) www.knowledgeun- latched.org/press-release/ [accessed 30 March 2014] 'Knowledge Unlatched Pilot Collection to Become Open Access - Nearly 300 Libraries Globally Pledge Their Support' (Knowledge Unlatched, 2014) www.knowledgeunlatched.org/press-release/ [accessed 30 March 2014]
  184. Morrison, Heather, 'Taylor & Francis Open Access Survey: Critique', The Imaginary Journal of Poetic Economics, 2013 http://poeticeconomics. blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/taylor-francis-open-access-survey.html [accessed 21 January 2014]
  185. Nature, 'Pricing', 2014 www.nature.com/nmat/pricing/index.html#site_li- cence [accessed 17 May 2014]
  186. Newton, Hazel, 'Breaking Boundaries in Academic Publishing: Launching a New Format for Scholarly Research', Insights: The UKSG Journal, 26 (2013), 70-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.26.1.70 · DOI
  187. O'Reilly, Tim, 'Piracy Is Progressive Taxation, and Other Thoughts on the Evolution of Online Distribution', O'Reilly P2P, 2002 www.openp2p. com/pub/a/p2p/2002/12/11/piracy.html [accessed 21 April 2014]
  188. Osborne, Robin, 'Why Open Access Makes No Sense', in Debating Open Access (London: British Academy, 2013), pp. 96-105 Palgrave Macmillan, 'Frequently Asked Questions', Palgrave Open, 2013 www.palgrave.com/open/faq.asp#section2 [accessed 21 December 2013] 'Introduction', Palgrave Macmillan: Open Peer Review Trial http://pal- graveopenreview.com/introduction/ [accessed 4 April 2014] Palgrave Macmillan Journals, 'Copyright FAQs', 2014 www.palgrave-jour- nals.com/pal/authors/copyright_faqs.html [accessed 22 February 2014]
  189. Palmeira, Mauricio M., and Joydeep Srivastava, 'Free Offer 6 ¼ Cheap Product: A Selective Accessibility Account on the Valuation of Free Offers', Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (2013), 644-56 http://dx.doi. org/10.1086/671565 · DOI · Paper page
  190. Park, Jane, 'An Interview with Frances Pinter of Bloomsbury Aca- demic', 2008 http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/10100 [accessed 22 January 2014]
  191. Philp, Mark, 'Foucault on Power: A Problem in Radical Translation?', Political Theory, 11 (1983), 29-52
  192. Pinter, Frances, and Christopher Kenneally, 'Publishing Pioneer Seeks Knowledge Unlatched', 2013 http://beyondthebookcast.com/tran- scripts/publishing-pioneer-seeks-knowledge-unlatched/ PLOS, 'PLOS ONE Journal Information' www.plosone.org/static/infor- mation [accessed 6 May 2013] 'Written Evidence to House of Commons Select Committee Inquiry', in Inquiry into Open Access. Fifth Report of Session 2013-2014, by House of Commons Business, Innovation and Skills Committee (London: House of Commons, 2013), pp. Ev80-Ev87 Poynder, Richard, 'Open Access Mandates: Ensuring Compliance', Open and Shut?, 2012 http://poynder.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/open-access- mandates-ensuring.html [accessed 17 May 2014]
  193. Rizor, Sara L., and Robert P. Holley, 'Open Access Goals Revisited: How Green and Gold Open Access Are Meeting (or Not) Their Original Goals', Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 45 (2014), 321-35 http://dx.doi. org/10.3138/jsp.45.4.01 · DOI
  194. ROAPE Editors, 'Yes to Egalitarian "Open Access", No to "Pay to Pub- lish": A ROAPE Position Statement on Open Access', Review of African Political Economy, 40 (2013), 177-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 03056244.2013.797757 · DOI
  195. Selwyn, Neil, 'Editorial: In Praise of Pessimism -The Need for Negativity in Educational Technology', British Journal of Educational Technology, 42 (2011), 713-18 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01215.x · DOI
  196. Shampanier, Kristina, Nina Mazar, and Dan Ariely, 'Zero as a Special Price: The True Value of Free Products', Marketing Science, 26 (2007), 742-57 http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1060.0254 · DOI · Paper page
  197. Small, Helen, The Value of the Humanities (Oxford University Press, 2013)
  198. Snow, C. P., The Two Cultures, Canto edn (Cambridge University Press, 1993)
  199. Solomon, David J., and Bo-ChristerBjörk, 'A Study of Open Access Jour- nals Using Article Processing Charges', Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63 (2012), 1485-95 http://dx. doi.org/10.1002/asi.22673 · DOI
  200. Matthew K. Gold (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2012), pp. 16-35

200 of 217 shown

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eve, M. P.
Affiliations
University of Lincoln (GB)
Corresponding author
Eve, Martin Paul
ORCID
Eve, Martin Paul
Venue
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Published
2014-11-26
DOI
10.1017/cbo9781316161012
OpenAlex
W2103021099
Cited by
223
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12
FWCI
19.05
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • EarthArXiv (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • EarthArXiv (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • LISSA (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Cambridge
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
Keywords
open access, humanities, scholarly communication, research dissemination, open licensing, pay-to-publish, scholarly publishing economics, history of open access

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review