CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 62Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesSpace Science and Extraterrestrial LifeOrigins and Evolution of Life

A Fortunate Universe: Life in a Finely Tuned Cosmos

Lewis, Geraint F., Barnes, Luke A., Schmidt, Brian·2016·Cambridge University Press eBooks
DOI 10.1017/cbo9781316661413
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Over the last forty years, scientists have uncovered evidence that if the Universe had been forged with even slightly different properties, life as we know it - and life as we can imagine it - would be impossible. Join us on a journey through how we understand the Universe, from its most basic particles and forces, to planets, stars and galaxies, and back through cosmic history to the birth of the cosmos. Conflicting notions about our place in the Universe are defined, defended and critiqued from scientific, philosophical and religious viewpoints. The authors' engaging and witty style addresses what fine-tuning might mean for the future of physics and the search for the ultimate laws of nature. Tackling difficult questions and providing thought-provoking answers, this volumes challenges us to consider our place in the cosmos, regardless of our initial convictions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9781316661413

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our best current science suggests that the laws of physics and the initial conditions of our universe are fine-tuned for the possibility of life.

    “Our best current science seems to suggest the laws of physics and the initial conditions of our universe are fine-tuned for the possibility of life.”

    From Is the fine-tuning evidence for a multiverse? (2024) · cites this paper as Lewis & Barnes, 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lewis, G. F., Barnes, L. A., & Schmidt, B.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Australian National University (AU)
ORCID
Venue
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Published
2016-10-06
DOI
10.1017/cbo9781316661413
OpenAlex
W3111156730
Cited by
62
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6
FWCI
3.22
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 7 d)
Locations
  • Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • International Linear Collider (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
Keywords
fine-tuning, anthropic principle, origin of the universe, fundamental physical constants, cosmic history, cosmology, philosophy of physics, life in the universe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review