The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Heterogeneity, omitted variable bias, and duration dependence
Abstract
This chapter will discuss models for longitudinal data in which a sample of individuals or firms is followed over time. A primary advantage of such data is that they allow us to test and relax assumptions that are implicit in a cross-sectional analysis. Section 1 considers the main issue in the context of the familiar linear model. Here a basic specification test is a comparison of a regression based on changes with a cross-sectional regression. This test is put in a general framework that relates it to tests for strict exogeneity in time series analysis. We show that the failure of strict exogeneity may be due to heterogeneity, which suggests a reformulation in which there is a mixture of strictly exogenous processes. The assumption of strict exogeneity in a mixture model is itself testable, and such tests should be routine whenever the standard analysis-of-covariance estimator is used. The treatment of heterogeneity leads to the statistical problem of incidental parameters. Since the typical panel has a large number of individuals observed over a short time period, the relevant limiting distributions have the number of individuals increasing but not the time dimension. If we allow for individual specific parameters, then maximizing the joint likelihood function does not in general provide a consistent estimator of the parameters common to all individuals. We discuss procedures that are valid in general, based on conditional, marginal, and posterior likelihood functions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2001) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 27,577
A Phase 2 Study of Bortezomib in Relapsed, Refractory Myeloma
Richardson, P. G., Barlogie, B., Berenson, J., Singhal, S., Jagannath, S., Irwin, D., Rajkumar, S. V., Srkalovic, G., Alsina, M., Alexanian, R., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa030288 · Cited by 2,632
Analyzing Duration Times in Marketing: Evidence for the Effectiveness of Hazard Rate Models
Helsen, K., & Schmittlein, D. C. (1993) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.12.4.395 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Chamberlain, G.
- Venue
- Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1985-10-31
- Pages
- 3-38
- OpenAlex
- W21284273
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.90
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Heterogeneity, omitted variable bias, and duration dependence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/ccol0521304539.001
- The paper
- Chamberlain, G. (1985). Heterogeneity, omitted variable bias, and duration dependence. Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data. https://doi.org/10.1017/ccol0521304539.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.