The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism
Abstract
This Companion presents both an introduction to the history of the ancient philosophical school of Epicureanism and also a critical account of the major areas of its philosophical interest. Chapters span the school's history from the early Hellenistic Garden to the Roman Empire and its later reception in the Early Modern period, introducing the reader to the Epicureans' contributions in physics, metaphysics, epistemology, psychology, ethics and politics. The international team of contributors includes scholars who have produced innovative and original research in various areas of Epicurean thought and they have produced essays which are accessible and of interest to philosophers, classicists, and anyone concerned with the diversity and preoccupations of Epicurean philosophy and the state of academic research in this field. The volume emphasises the interrelation of the different areas of the Epicureans' philosophical interests while also drawing attention to points of interpretative difficulty and controversy.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“That animal breathing expressed the intelligence, and the intelligibility, of the universe was suggested by Diogenes of Apollonia, who found in breathing (ἀναπνέοντα) the 'significant evidence' (μεγάλα σημεῖα) that both humans and other animals possessed intelligence (νόησις).20”
From Cosmic Spiritualism among the Pythagoreans, Stoics, Jews and Early Christians (2019) · cites this paper as [20]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–216 of 216
Keith, A. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780197607008.003.0013
Keith, A. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780197607008.003.0007
Keith, A. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780197607008.002.0002
Keith, A. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780197607008.003.0003
Niece of the Augustan Aristocracy
Keith, A. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780197607008.003.0004
Keith, A. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780197607008.001.0001
Keith, A. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780197607008.002.0007
Responsabilité et engagement dans le stoïcisme
D’Jeranian, O. (2015) · doi:10.70675/c1492c8ez97c2z4859zb350za002f8078e22
Metadata
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2009-07-02
- OpenAlex
- W632553606
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 7.79
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Historical Philosophy and Science
- Keywords
- Epicureanism, Hellenistic philosophy, Epicurean physics, Epicurean epistemology, Epicurean psychology, Epicurean ethics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review