The DOI matches its Crossref record; 109 of the 109 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Monarchies and monarchic Ideas
Abstract
Within twenty years of Alexander's death his empire had split into separate states, whose rulers had taken the title of king. The new kings were forceful and ambitious men who relied on their armies and mostly ruled in lands where monarchy was traditional. The new monarchies presented Greeks with ideological problems. Wherever they lived, they had to adjust to a dominant royal power and to find an acceptable place for monarchy within their political philosophy. It has been widely argued that the Antigonid monarchy in Macedonia differed in important respects from monarchy in the other kingdoms. Hellenistic monarchy was closely associated with religion and the gods. More varied in both its form and its implications is the religious practice commonly known as ruler-cult. The legacy of Hellenistic kingship lived on in the Roman Empire, its ideology and its institutions, secular and religious alike, now adapted to the requirements of a universal monarchy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A History of Ancient Mathematical Astronomy
Neugebauer, O. (1975) · Studies in the History of Mathematics and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-61910-6 · Cited by 986
Taxes and Trade in the Roman Empire (200 B.C.–A.D. 400)
Hopkins, K. (1980) · Journal of Roman Studies · doi:10.2307/299558 · Cited by 939
A Historical Commentary on Polybius
Salmon, E. T., & Walbank, F. W. (1958) · The American Journal of Philology · doi:10.2307/292111 · Cited by 845
Self-citationThe Corn Supply of Ancient Rome
Grant, R. M., & Rickman, G. E. (1981) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1857459 · Cited by 620
Ancient Slavery and Modern Ideology
Bowersock, G. W., & Finley, M. I. (1981) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1860387 · Cited by 509
Downey, G. (1961) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400877737 · Cited by 471
Walbank, F. W. (1972) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520342637 · Cited by 436
Self-citationAlien Wisdom: The Limits of Hellenization
Starr, C. G., & Momigliano, A. (1976) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1852890 · Cited by 430
Roman Rule in Asia Minor, Volume 2 (Notes)
Magie, D. (1950) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400887743 · Cited by 398
Imperialism in the Ancient World: The Cambridge University Research Seminar in Ancient History
(1979) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107297937 · Cited by 384
Cited by
(1999) · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Walbank, F. W.
- Venue
- The Cambridge Ancient History
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1984-09-06
- Pages
- 62-100
- OpenAlex
- W2489681203
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 109
- FWCI
- 7.35
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monarchies and monarchic Ideas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/chol9780521234450.004
- The paper
- Walbank, F. W. (1984). Monarchies and monarchic Ideas. The Cambridge Ancient History. https://doi.org/10.1017/chol9780521234450.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.