CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 36Disaster Response and ManagementDisaster Management and ResilienceEarthquake and Disaster Impact Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impacts of the Emergency Mass Evacuation of the Elderly From Residential Care Facilities After the 2011 Christchurch Earthquake

Heppenstall, Claire P., Wilkinson, Tim J., Hanger, H. Carl, Dhanak, Michelle R., Keeling, Sally·2013·Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
DOI 10.1017/dmp.2013.47
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The 2011 earthquake that devastated Christchurch, New Zealand, led to the closure and evacuation of 7 residential care facilities and the partial evacuation of 2 more. Altogether, 516 elderly persons were evacuated. The emergent nature of the disaster was unexpected and largely unplanned for. This study explored the evacuees' experiences and identified lessons learned for future disaster planning. METHODS: This qualitative study used a general inductive method. Semistructured interviews with evacuees were held in 4 centers throughout New Zealand. Their informal caregivers were also identified and interviewed. Answers were coded and grouped for key themes to provide lessons learned for future disaster planning. RESULTS: We conducted 50 interviews with older people and 34 with informal caregivers. Key themes that emerged were resilience and factors that promoted resilience, including personal attitudes, life experiences, enhanced family support, and social supports. Areas of concern were (1) the mental health of evacuees: 36% reported some symptoms of anxiety, while 32.4% of caregivers reported some cognitive decline; and (2) communication difficulties during the evacuations. CONCLUSIONS: Older people were remarkably resilient to the difficult events, and resilience was promoted by family and community support. Anxiety was reported by older people, while informal caregivers reported cognitive issues. Communication difficulties were a major concern.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/dmp.2013.47

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 36

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Heppenstall, C. P., Wilkinson, T. J., Hanger, H. C., Dhanak, M. R., & Keeling, S.
Affiliations
Princess Margaret Hospital (NZ)
Corresponding author
Heppenstall, Claire P.
ORCID
Venue
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2013-05-23
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
419-423
ISSN
  • 1935-7893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-744X
DOI
10.1017/dmp.2013.47
OpenAlex
W1984289204
Cited by
36
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified)
Locations
  • Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canterbury District Health Board
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Disaster Response and Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
Keywords
2011 Christchurch earthquake, emergency evacuation, older adults, care homes, disaster preparedness, resilience, informal caregivers, anxiety, cognitive decline, communication difficulties, family support, social support
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Homes for the Aged, Humans, Middle Aged, New Zealand, Caregivers, Rescue Work, Qualitative Research, Earthquakes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review