Cited by 57Disaster Management and ResilienceEducation, Safety, and Science StudiesDisaster Response and Management

Disaster Preparedness among University Students in Guangzhou, China: Assessment of Status and Demand for Disaster Education

Tan, Yibing, Liao, Xiaolan, Su, Haihao, Li, Chun, Xiang, Jiagen, Dong, Zhaoyang·2017·Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness

Abstract

Objective: This study had 2 aims. First, we evaluated the current levels of disaster preparedness among university students in southern China. Second, we assessed students’ demands for future disaster education. In addition, we examined the influence of demographic factors on current disaster preparedness status and demand. Methods: A cross-sectional design was used. The data were collected from 1893 students in 10 universities in the Guangzhou Higher Education Mega (GHEM) center. A self-administered questionnaire developed for this study was administered to assess the current status and demand for disaster education. Results: The results are based on 1764 valid questionnaires. Among the participants, 77.8% reported having had disaster education experiences before, 85.5% indicated their desire for a systematic disaster course, and 75.4% expressed their willingness to take such a course upon its availability. The total mean score for demand for disaster course content (5-point Likert scale) was 4.17±0.84, with items relating to rescue skills given the highest scores. These results suggested that students had high desires for disaster preparedness knowledge, especially knowledge concerning rescue skills. We observed significant differences in disaster education experiences between male and female students and across programs, school years, and home locations. Furthermore, we observed significant differences in demand for disaster course content between male and female students and across universities, student programs, years of school, and students’ majors. Conclusion: A systematic disaster course focused on rescue skills is needed by all types of universities. To improve the disaster education system in universities, disaster drills should be performed on a semester basis as a refresher and to enhance disaster preparedness. The government and universities should support building a simulated disaster rescue center and recruit faculty from the emergency department, especially those who have had disaster relief experience. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2017;11:310–317)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/dmp.2016.124

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Tan, Y., Liao, X., Su, H., Li, C., Xiang, J., & Dong, Z.
Affiliations
  • Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (CN)
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
  • Guangdong Province Women and Children Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Tan, Yibing
Venue
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
Published
2016-09-26
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
310-317
ISSN
  • 1935-7893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-744X
OpenAlex
W2523839616
Cited by
57
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Education, Safety, and Science Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Disaster Response and Management
Keywords
disaster preparedness, university students, disaster education, rescue skills, disaster drills, gender differences, higher education, Guangzhou
MeSH terms
Workforce, Adult, China, Civil Defense, Cross-Sectional Studies, Educational Measurement, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Universities, Program Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review