The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Bird’s Eye View on EU Anti-Discrimination Law: The Impact of the 2000 Equality Directives
Open accessAbstract
The year 2000 marked the birth of EU anti-discrimination law as a field in its own right, with the adoption of two major Equality Directives. They extended the prohibition of discrimination with five additional grounds and expanded the material scope of equality regulation. Having reached its eighteenth birthday in the year 2018, EU anti-discrimination law can now celebrate its adulthood and deserves a bird’s eye exploration of its achievements, failures, and prospects. The present Article provides this exploration by zooming in on these twin Directives, as well as on the “new” grounds of discrimination planted therein, namely race and ethnicity—the grounds introduced by the Race Equality Directive—religion, sexual orientation, age, and disability—the grounds introduced by Framework Equality Directive—and the related jurisprudence of European courts. It first outlines the genesis and main stages in the development of EU anti-discrimination law, followed by a discussion of major normative and practical themes emerging in EU anti-discrimination law after 2000, such as the personal and material scope of the Directives, new forms of discrimination, mechanisms to counteract discrimination, and the proceduralization of EU anti-discrimination law.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“We discarded gender and marital status as decision basis because these factors are explicitly protected by law [14].”
From Disentangling Fairness Perceptions in Algorithmic Decision-Making: the Effects of Explanations, Human Oversight, and Contestability (2023) · cites this paper as [14]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bribosia, E., Ringelheim, J., & Rorive, I. (2010) · Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law · doi:10.1177/1023263x1001700203 · Cited by 26
The Case for a Considered Hierarchy of Discrimination Grounds in EU Law
Howard, E. (2006) · Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law · doi:10.1177/1023263x0601300404 · Cited by 24
Religious Discrimination in the Workplace : Achbita and Bougnaoui
(2018) · Hart Publishing eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781509915033.ch-008 · Cited by 5
Key concepts in EU anti-discrimination law
Ellis, E., & Watson, P. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199698462.003.0004 · Cited by 4
Tzevelekos, V. P. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316535134.008 · Cited by 3
Waddington, L., Belavusau, U., & Henrard, K. (2018) · Hart Publishing eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781509915033.ch-015 · Cited by 3
Self-citation(2018) · Hart Publishing eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781509915033.ch-014 · Cited by 3
Henrard, K. A. M. (2018) · EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) · Cited by 3
Self-citationKümeke, S. (2024) · Das Gesundheitswesen · doi:10.1055/s-0044-1782002 · Cited by 3
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Jennifer Jackson-Preece, Emerging Standards of Reasonable Accommodation Towards Minorities in Europe?, in INSTITUTIONAL ACCOMMODATION AND THE CITIZEN: LEGAL AND POLITICAL INTERACTION IN A PLURALIST SOCIETY 120 (2010) (considering that duties of reasonable accommodation should be available for members of all structurally disadvan- taged groups). See also Mark Bell & Lisa Waddington, Reflecting on Inequalities in European Equality Law, 28 Eur. L. Rev. 349, 362 (2003) (arguing that duties of reasonable accommodation would similarly be justified on grounds of race or religion);
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yurrita, M., Draws, T., Balayn, A., Murray-Rust, D., Tintarev, N., & Bozzon, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581161 · Cited by 108
“in our main study because it is explicitly protected by law [14].”
BackgroundMethod
Metadata
- Authors
- Belavusau, U., & Henrard, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- ORCID
- Henrard, Kristin
- Venue
- German Law Journal
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 05
- Pages
- 614-636
- ISSN
- 2071-8322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2955733736
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 10.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- German Law Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Discrimination and Equality Law
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European and International Law Studies
- Social Sciences › Law › European Law and Migration
- Keywords
- EU anti-discrimination law, grounds of discrimination, race and ethnicity, sexual orientation, age discrimination, disability discrimination, European Court of Justice case law
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review