Cited by 10Aeolian processes and effectsEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesCoastal wetland ecosystem dynamics

Invasion by Ammophila arenaria alters soil chemistry, leaving lasting legacy effects on restored coastal dunes in California

Parsons, Lorraine S., Becker, Benjamin H.·2021·Invasive Plant Science and Management

Abstract

Many restoration projects rely on invasive plant removal to restore ecosystems. However, success of restoration efforts relying on invasive removal can be jeopardized, because in addition to displacing native plants, invasives can also dramatically impact soils. Many studies have documented invasives’ effects on soil chemistry and microbiota. While European beachgrass [Ammophila arenaria(L.) Link] is a worldwide invasive problem in coastal dunes outside northern Europe, little attention has been paid to effects of this species on soil chemistry following invasion, even though it establishes persistent, dense monocultures. In our study, we evaluated effects ofA. arenariainvasion on soil chemistry of coastal dunes at Point Reyes National Seashore (PRNS); persistence of effects following removal by mechanical or herbicide treatment (legacy effects); and effects of treatment independent of invasion. Dune restoration efforts at PRNS have met with mixed success, especially in herbicide-treated backdunes, where decomposition of deadA. arenariahas been greatly delayed. Based on results, invasion impacted 74% of 19 variables assessed, although there was a significant interaction in many cases with successional status (earlier vs. later). Almost 60% of invasion effects persisted after restoration, with legacy effects prevalent in herbicide-treated backdunes where sand deposition from adjacent beaches could not mitigate effects as it could in herbicide-treated foredunes. Mechanical remo…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/inp.2021.16

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several environmental factors influence the growth and distribution of dune-forming plants, including soil salinity, exposure to salt spray, the dynamics of sand burial or erosion, and the availability of nutrients and water.

    “Several environmental factors influence the growth and distribution of dune-forming plants, including soil salinity, exposure to salt spray, the dynamics of sand burial or erosion, and the availability of nutrients and water (Parsons and Becker, 2021;Van Puijenbroek et al., 2017;Konlechner et al., 2013;Dixon et al., 2004;Martinez et al., 1996).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Parsons, L. S., & Becker, B. H.
Affiliations
National Park Service (US)
Corresponding author
Parsons, Lorraine S.
Venue
Invasive Plant Science and Management
Published
2021-05-17
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
75-91
ISSN
  • 1939-7291 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-747X
OpenAlex
W3161662119
Cited by
10
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Invasive Plant Science and Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Aeolian processes and effects
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
Keywords
Ammophila arenaria, invasive plant removal, legacy effects, soil chemistry, coastal dune restoration, herbicide application, decomposition, C/N ratio, microbial decomposition, succession, Point Reyes National Seashore

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review