The DOI matches its Crossref record; 147 of the 147 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Principles for the Validation and Use of Personnel Selection Procedures
Abstract
The Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP) is pleased to offer the fifth edition of the Principles for the Validation and Use of Personnel Selection Procedures, which was approved by the APA Council of Representatives in August 2018 as an authoritative guidelines document for employee selection testing and an official statement of the APA. Over a three-year period, the Principles Revision Committee updated this document from the fourth edition to be consistent with the 2014 Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing, invited commentary from SIOP and APA that informed subsequent revisions, and solicited a thorough legal review.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470743386 · Cited by 14,225
Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
Hammer, T. H., Anderson, J., Gurdon, M., Jick, T., Petit, A., Stern, R., Schwartz, H., Vardi, Y., & Dunnette, M. D. (1977) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391755 · Cited by 11,945
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
BARRICK, M. R., & MOUNT, M. K. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x · Cited by 8,689
Statistical Analysis with Missing Data
Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781119013563 · Cited by 8,473
The American Psychological Association
Langfeld, H. S. (1919) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.49.1254.51 · Cited by 7,475
(2010) · Cited by 7,034
Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world
Graham, J. W. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530 · Cited by 6,163
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-5278 · Cited by 5,339
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.124.2.262 · Cited by 4,180
Cited by
THE PRACTICE OF COMPETENCY MODELING
SHIPPMANN, J. S., ASH, R. A., BATJTSTA, M., CARR, L., EYDE, L. D., HESKETH, B., KEHOE, J., PEARLMAN, K., PRIEN, E. P., & SANCHEZ, J. I. (2000) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00220.x · Cited by 707
RISK, RACE, AND RECIDIVISM: PREDICTIVE BIAS AND DISPARATE IMPACT*
SKEEM, J. L., & LOWENKAMP, C. T. (2016) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12123 · Cited by 317
Mazzone, E., Puliatti, S., Amato, M., Bunting, B., Rocco, B., Montorsi, F., Mottrie, A., & Gallagher, A. G. (2021) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000004650 · Cited by 148
Armstrong, M. B., Landers, R. N., & Collmus, A. B. (2016) · Advances in Multimedia and Interactive Technologies · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-8651-9.ch007 · Cited by 85
Robots Are Judging Me: Perceived Fairness of Algorithmic Recruitment Tools
Hilliard, A., Guenole, N., & Leutner, F. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.940456 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Venue
- Industrial and Organizational Psychology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 1-97
- ISSN
- 1754-9426 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-9434
- OpenAlex
- W3134353245
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 147
- FWCI
- 8.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Principles for the Validation and Use of Personnel Selection Procedures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/iop.2018.195
- The paper
- Principles for the Validation and Use of Personnel Selection Procedures. (2018). Industrial and Organizational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2018.195
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
