Cited by 1Ancient Near East HistoryBiblical Studies and InterpretationAncient Egypt and Archaeology

THE ASSYRIAN DISTANZANGABEN IN RELATION TO THE REGNAL YEARS RECORDED IN THE ASSYRIAN KING LIST

Mahieu, Bieke·2021·Iraq

Abstract

Several so-called Distanzangaben (lit. “designations of distance”), found in Assyrian inscriptions, record time spans between events (mainly building activities) of Assyrian rulers. Such chronological data have mostly been studied as entities (for purposes of absolute chronology), and only rarely with regard to their composition. While some of the Distanzangaben can be explained as mere summations of the regnal years recorded in the Assyrian King List, others remain enigmatic. The present article attempts to trace the composition of every Distanzangabe. For those compiled by Tiglath-pileser I and Esarhaddon, ideological purposes seem to be implied. The one compiled by Sennacherib sheds light on the chronology of Tiglath-pileser I's campaigns.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/irq.2021.8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other publications referring to ancient texts about temple dedication, rededication, or commemoration in connection with chronological issues have usually done so as a side note to debates about broader chronological issues in the context of Distanzangaben, but the usefulness of these types of temple dedication texts and their mentions of elapsed years for discovering the correct years of ancient

    “Other publications referring to ancient texts that relate to the dedication, rededication, or commemoration of a temple in connection with chronological issues have usually done so as a side note to debates about broader chronological issues in the context of Distanzangaben (long-period time spans), but the usefulness of these types of temple dedication texts and their mentions of elapsed years”

Authors
Mahieu, B.
Corresponding author
Mahieu, Bieke
Venue
Iraq
Published
2021-09-13
Volume
83
Pages
67-85
ISSN
  • 0021-0889 (ISSN-L)
  • 2053-4744
OpenAlex
W3199114159
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Iraq (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
Keywords
regnal years, Assyrian chronology, Esarhaddon, Sennacherib, construction activity, absolute chronology, Assyrian inscriptions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review