The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Subgrid modelling for two-dimensional turbulence using neural networks
Open accessAbstract
In this investigation, a data-driven turbulence closure framework is introduced and deployed for the subgrid modelling of Kraichnan turbulence. The novelty of the proposed method lies in the fact that snapshots from high-fidelity numerical data are used to inform artificial neural networks for predicting the turbulence source term through localized grid-resolved information. In particular, our proposed methodology successfully establishes a map between inputs given by stencils of the vorticity and the streamfunction along with information from two well-known eddy-viscosity kernels. Through this we predict the subgrid vorticity forcing in a temporally and spatially dynamic fashion. Our study is both a priori and a posteriori in nature. In the former, we present an extensive hyper-parameter optimization analysis in addition to learning quantification through probability-density-function-based validation of subgrid predictions. In the latter, we analyse the performance of our framework for flow evolution in a classical decaying two-dimensional turbulence test case in the presence of errors related to temporal and spatial discretization. Statistical assessments in the form of angle-averaged kinetic energy spectra demonstrate the promise of the proposed methodology for subgrid quantity inference. In addition, it is also observed that some measure of a posteriori error must be considered during optimal model selection for greater accuracy. The results in this article thus represent a promising development in the formalization of a framework for generation of heuristic-free turbulence closures from data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A dynamic subgrid–scale eddy viscosity model
Germano, M., Piomelli, U., Moin, P., & Cabot, W. H. (1991) · Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics · doi:10.1063/1.857955 · Cited by 7,305
Inertial Ranges in Two-Dimensional Turbulence
Kraichnan, R. H. (1967) · The Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/1.1762301 · Cited by 3,170
Reynolds averaged turbulence modelling using deep neural networks with embedded invariance
Ling, J., Kurzawski, A., & Templeton, J. (2016) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/jfm.2016.615 · Cited by 1,624
Hidden physics models: Machine learning of nonlinear partial differential equations
Raissi, M., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2018) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2017.11.039 · Cited by 1,349
An eddy-viscosity subgrid-scale model for turbulent shear flow: Algebraic theory and applications
Vreman, A. W. (2004) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/1.1785131 · Cited by 1,334
Arakawa, A. (1966) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/0021-9991(66)90015-5 · Cited by 1,267
Deep learning in fluid dynamics
Kutz, J. N. (2017) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/jfm.2016.803 · Cited by 831
A dynamic localization model for large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows
Ghosal, S., Lund, T. S., Moin, P., & Akselvoll, K. (1995) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/s0022112095000711 · Cited by 791
Wang, J.-X., Wu, J.-L., & Xiao, H. (2017) · Physical Review Fluids · doi:10.1103/physrevfluids.2.034603 · Cited by 737
A paradigm for data-driven predictive modeling using field inversion and machine learning
Parish, E. J., & Duraisamy, K. (2016) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2015.11.012 · Cited by 620
Cited by
Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanics
Brunton, S. L., Noack, B. R., & Koumoutsakos, P. (2020) · Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-010719-060214 · Cited by 3,063
Digital twin: values, challenges and enablers from a modeling perspective
Rasheed, A., San, O., & Kvamsdal, T. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2970143 · Cited by 1,952
Self-citationMachine learning–accelerated computational fluid dynamics
Kochkov, D., Smith, J. A., Alieva, A., Wang, Q., Brenner, M. P., & Hoyer, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2101784118 · Cited by 1,042
Unsupervised deep learning for super-resolution reconstruction of turbulence
Kim, H., Kim, J., Won, S., & Lee, C. (2021) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/jfm.2020.1028 · Cited by 285
Data-Driven Aerospace Engineering: Reframing the Industry with Machine Learning
Brunton, S. L., Nathan Kutz, J., Manohar, K., Aravkin, A. Y., Morgansen, K., Klemisch, J., Goebel, N., Buttrick, J., Poskin, J., Blom-Schieber, A. W., et al. (2021) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/1.j060131 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Maulik, R., San, O., Rasheed, A., & Vedula, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Fluid Mechanics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2018-11-02
- Volume
- 858
- Pages
- 122-144
- ISSN
- 0022-1120 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7645
- OpenAlex
- W2887432454
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 11.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Subgrid modelling for two-dimensional turbulence using neural networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/jfm.2018.770
- The paper
- Maulik, R., San, O., Rasheed, A., & Vedula, P. (2019). Subgrid modelling for two-dimensional turbulence using neural networks. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.770
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.