Cited by 3Fluid Dynamics and Vibration AnalysisFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsModel Reduction and Neural Networks

On the absence of a secondary vortex street in three-dimensional and turbulent cylinder wakes

Open access
Jiang, Hongyi·2024·Journal of Fluid Mechanics

Abstract

Bluff-body wakes generally become three-dimensional (3-D) and then turbulent when the Reynolds number exceeds a few hundred. Other than an alternate shedding of the spanwise vortices behind the body and a gradual decay and annihilation of the vortices with distance downstream, whether a secondary vortex street would develop in the relatively far wake has been a long-standing argument in the literature. This argument is addressed in the present study. Specifically, direct numerical simulations and transient growth analysis are performed to examine the two-dimensional and 3-D wakes of different bluff bodies, including circular cylinder, square cylinder, diamond cylinder and rectangular cylinders with different cross-sectional aspect ratios. We found that a secondary vortex street is absent for most 3-D and turbulent wakes. The root cause is the weakening of spanwise vortices by 3-D wake instability modes and streamwise circulation/vorticity. The weakened spanwise vortices induce reduced mean shear in the intermediate wake, which then induces much smaller perturbation energy growth that is below the threshold for the emergence of a secondary vortex street. This finding suggests that the 3-D and turbulence characteristics, and the momentum, mass and heat transport in the relatively far wake of bluff bodies, would not be influenced by extra anisotropy or inhomogeneity caused by a secondary vortex street.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/jfm.2024.615

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 3

Authors
Jiang, H.
Affiliations
Zhejiang University (CN)
Corresponding author
Jiang, Hongyi
Venue
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Published
2024-08-25
Volume
993
ISSN
  • 0022-1120 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7645
OpenAlex
W4402516391
Cited by
3
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Fluid Mechanics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (52301341)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Keywords
bluff body wake, three-dimensional wake, turbulent wake, spanwise vortices, circular cylinder, square cylinder, rectangular cylinder, cross-sectional aspect ratio, mean shear, far wake

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review