Reflective Teaching Practice in a Darug Classroom: How Teachers can Build Relationships With an Aboriginal Community Outside the School
Open accessAbstract
This project has been developed on Darug country, Sydney to examine how pre-service and beginning teachers can work with Aboriginal people in their local urban community. These teachers often want to know how to approach an Aboriginal ‘community’, how they can ask Aboriginal people for information in order to include it in their teaching, and how to adopt respectful ways of talking when they contact a community member. While these questions are commonly addressed in the Working with Community documents published by the various state Departments of Education, we found that the actual practice of working with a community is daunting for many. This article therefore attempts to document two examples of this practice, and in so doing it applies the protocols identified by Martin (2008) to the reflective work of both a pre-service teacher and a university educator. It also draws on the extensive literature of reflective practice developed for classrooms, and applies this to pedagogical practice outside schools.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These courses commonly include teaching Indigenous history, culture, perspectives, and protocols.
“They commonly include teaching Indigenous history, culture, perspectives, and protocols (Harrison and Murray 2012).”
From The teaching of Indigenous knowledge and perspectives in initial teacher education: a scoping review of empirical studies (2024) · cites this paper as Harrison and Murray 2012
Cites
Defining Reflection: Another Look at John Dewey and Reflective Thinking
Rodgers, C. (2002) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146810210400402 · Cited by 1,848 · cited 7× · see citing works
“(Rogers, 2002, p. 860).”
BackgroundResultInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yip, S. Y., & Chakma, U. (2024) · Journal of Further and Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0309877x.2024.2327029 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“They commonly include teaching Indigenous history, culture, perspectives, and protocols (Harrison and Murray 2012).”
Background
- Authors
- Harrison, N., & Murray, B.
- Affiliations
- Macquarie University (AU)
- Auburn School District (US)
- Corresponding author
- Harrison, Neil
- ORCID
- Harrison, Neil
- Venue
- The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education
- Publisher
- The University of Queensland
- Published
- 2012-01-22
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 139-145
- ISSN
- 1326-0111 (ISSN-L)
- 2049-7784
- OpenAlex
- W1970237225
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 9.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Indigenous and Place-Based Education
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Keywords
- reflective teaching practice, pre-service teachers, novice teachers, urban Aboriginal communities, culturally responsive teaching, community protocols, indigenous education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review