The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On defining image schemas
Open accessAbstract
In this theoretical paper we propose three different kinds of cognitive structure that have not been differentiated in the psychological and cognitive linguistic literatures. They are spatial primitives, image schemas, and schematic integrations. Spatial primitives are the first conceptual building blocks formed in infancy, image schemas are simple spatial stories built from them, and schematic integrations use the first two types to build concepts that include non-spatial elements, such as force and emotion. These different kinds of structure have all come under the umbrella term of ‘image schemas’. However, they differ in their content, developmental origin, imageability, and role in meaning construction in language and in thought. The present paper indicates how preverbal conceptualization needs to be taken into account for a complete understanding of image schemas and their uses. It provides examples to illustrate this influence, the most important of these being the primacy of imageable spatial information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001 · Cited by 20,632
Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things
Lakoff, G. (1987) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 · Cited by 12,386
Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind
Odlin, T., & Lakoff, G. P. (1988) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.2307/1982238 · Cited by 7,367
The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason
Johnson, M. (1987) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001 · Cited by 6,465
Play, Dreams And Imitation In Childhood
Piaget, J. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315009698 · Cited by 5,360
The contemporary theory of metaphor
Lakoff, G. (1993) · Metaphor and Thought · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173865.013 · Cited by 5,349
The way we think: conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-1223 · Cited by 5,327
The Origin of Concepts: (513702014-002)
Carey, S. (2013) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e513702014-002 · Cited by 2,312
Mappings in Thought and Language
Fauconnier, G. (1997) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174220 · Cited by 2,168
The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics
(2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738632.001.0001 · Cited by 2,135
Cited by
Cultural Schemas: What They Are, How to Find Them, and What to Do Once You’ve Caught One
Boutyline, A., & Soter, L. K. (2021) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/00031224211024525 · Cited by 216
Culture beneath discourse: a conceptual model for analyzing nondeclarative cultural knowledge
Rotolo, M. (2022) · American Journal of Cultural Sociology · doi:10.1057/s41290-021-00135-0 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- MANDLER, J. M., & PAGÁN CÁNOVAS, C.
- Venue
- Language and Cognition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2014-05-13
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 510-532
- ISSN
- 1866-9808 (ISSN-L)
- 1866-9859
- OpenAlex
- W2169507751
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 81
- FWCI
- 21.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On defining image schemas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/langcog.2014.14
- The paper
- MANDLER, J. M., & PAGÁN CÁNOVAS, C. (2014). On defining image schemas. Language and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2014.14
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.