The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 3 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
On the Use of Two-Way Fixed Effects Regression Models for Causal Inference with Panel Data
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The two-way linear fixed effects regression ( 2FE ) has become a default method for estimating causal effects from panel data. Many applied researchers use the 2FE estimator to adjust for unobserved unit-specific and time-specific confounders at the same time. Unfortunately, we demonstrate that the ability of the 2FE model to simultaneously adjust for these two types of unobserved confounders critically relies upon the assumption of linear additive effects. Another common justification for the use of the 2FE estimator is based on its equivalence to the difference-in-differences estimator under the simplest setting with two groups and two time periods. We show that this equivalence does not hold under more general settings commonly encountered in applied research. Instead, we prove that the multi-period difference-in-differences estimator is equivalent to the weighted 2FE estimator with some observations having negative weights. These analytical results imply that in contrast to the popular belief, the 2FE estimator does not represent a design-based, nonparametric estimation strategy for causal inference. Instead, its validity fundamentally rests on the modeling assumptions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
9 Own interpretation · 5 No basis given · 2 Sources not found
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Instead, we prove that the multi-period difference-in-differences estimator is equivalent to the weighted FE estimator with some observations having negative weights.”
- Also stated in: § . The Multi-period Difference-in-Differences Estimator · boosted
“Instead, the following theorem establishes that the general multi-period DiD estimator given in Equation ( ) is equivalent to a weighted two-way fixed effects regression estimator.”
- Also stated in: § T (Difference-in-Differences · plain
“Second, although the multi-period DiD estimator can be shown to be equivalent to the weighted FE estimator, some control observations will have negative regression weights.”
§ On the Use of Two-Way Fixed Effects Regression Models for Causal Inference with Panel Data > Abstract
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § . The Multi-period Difference-in-Differences Estimator · boosted
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The next proposition establishes that this two-way matching estimator, which eliminates mismatches within-unit and within-time dimension, can be written as a weighted FE estimator.”
§ On the Use of Two-Way Fixed Effects Regression Models for Causal Inference with Panel Data > Adjustment for Unobserved Confounders
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The treatment varies within each unit as well as within each time period.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although it is generally impossible to eliminate all mismatches, in this section we show that we can do so under the difference-in-differences (DiD) design.”
- Also stated in: § . The Multi-period Difference-in-Differences Estimator · plain
“It is worth noting that all three sets only contain control observations, thereby eliminating all mismatches.”
§ On the Use of Two-Way Fixed Effects Regression Models for Causal Inference with Panel Data > The Difference-in-Differences Design
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The parallel trend assumption holds for the DiD design.
- Also stated in: § . The Multi-period Difference-in-Differences Estimator · plain
In the paper
“The two-way fixed effects estimator defined in Equation ( ) is equivalent to the following matching estimator,”
- Also stated in: § Adjustment for Unobserved Confounders · plain
“The proposition shows that the estimated counterfactual outcome of a given observation, that is,”
§ On the Use of Two-Way Fixed Effects Regression Models for Causal Inference with Panel Data > Adjustment for Unobserved Confounders
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Imai and Kim
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Adjustment for Unobserved Confounders · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, even the weighted FE estimator, which has fewer mismatches than the standard FE estimator, suffers from some mismatches.”
§ On the Use of Two-Way Fixed Effects Regression Models for Causal Inference with Panel Data > P
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The estimator also has an adjustment set whose observations belong to neither the same unit nor the same time period as the observation being matched with.”
§ On the Use of Two-Way Fixed Effects Regression Models for Causal Inference with Panel Data > P
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We show that this equivalence does not hold under more general settings commonly encountered in applied research.”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
“However, we show that this equivalence does not hold under more general settings frequently encountered in applied research.”
§ On the Use of Two-Way Fixed Effects Regression Models for Causal Inference with Panel Data > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Unfortunately, we demonstrate that the ability of the FE model to simultaneously adjust for these two types of unobserved confounders critically relies upon the assumption of linear additive effects.”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · boosted
“Unfortunately, we show that the FE's ability to simultaneously adjust for the two types of unobserved confounders critically hinges upon the assumption of linear additive effects.”
§ On the Use of Two-Way Fixed Effects Regression Models for Causal Inference with Panel Data > Abstract
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Introduction · boosted
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Another common justification is based on the fact that the FE estimator is equivalent to the difference-in-differences estimator under the simplest setting with two groups and two time periods (e.g., Bertrand, Duflo, and Mullainathan ; Angrist and Pischke ).”
- Also stated in: § . The Multi-period Difference-in-Differences Estimator · boosted
“It is well known that the standard nonparametric DiD estimator is numerically equivalent to the FE estimator in the simplest setting, in which there are only two time periods and the treatment is administered only to one group of units in the second time period.”
§ On the Use of Two-Way Fixed Effects Regression Models for Causal Inference with Panel Data > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Bertrand, Duflo, and Mullainathan
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Angrist and Pischke
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § . The Multi-period Difference-in-Differences Estimator · boosted
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since the regression weights should generally positive, the results of this section shows that the justification of the FE estimator as the DiD estimator is not warranted unless the linearity assumption is imposed.”
§ On the Use of Two-Way Fixed Effects Regression Models for Causal Inference with Panel Data > T (Difference-in-Differences
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
The two-way FE regression is a default method for estimating causal effects from panel data among applied researchers.
“The two-way linear fixed effects regression ( FE) has become a default method for estimating causal effects from panel data.”
“Many social scientists use the two-way fixed effects ( FE) regression, or linear regression with unit and time fixed effects, as the default methodology for estimating causal effects from panel data.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many applied researchers use the FE estimator to adjust for unobserved unit-specific and time-specific confounders at the same time.
“Many applied researchers use the FE estimator to adjust for unobserved unit-specific and time-specific confounders at the same time.”
“Applied researchers o en use the FE regression to adjust for unobserved unit-specific and time-specific confounders at the same time.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The two types of unobserved confounders (unit-specific and time-specific) are additive and separable, with no interaction between them.
“Thus, although the interaction between these two types of unobserved confounders is assumed to be absent, there is no functional-form restriction on h(•) and f (•).”
“In other words, since the treatment is binary, the model makes no restriction other than the additivity and separability of the two types of unobserved confounders.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The parallel trend assumption holds for the DiD design.
“To establish the relations between the FE and DiD estimators, we begin by considering the following parallel trend assumption, A (Parallel Trend).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The treatment varies within each unit as well as within each time period.
“Assume that the treatment varies within each unit as well as within each time period, that is, 0 < T t =1 X i t < T for each i and 0 < N i =1 X i t < N for each t.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
There is at least one treated and control unit, and at least one unit with D_it = 1.
“Assume that there is at least one treated and control unit, that is, 0 < N i =1 T t =1 X i t < NT , and that there is at least one unit with D i t = 1, that is, 0 < N i =1 T t =1 D i t .”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This approach yields an interpretable causal effect under generalizations of the parallel trends assumption and and an additional 'no carryover' assumption that imposes that the potential outcomes depend only on current treatment status and not on the full treatment history.”
From What's trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature (2023) · cites this paper as Imai and Kim (2021)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“de Chaisemartin and D'Haultfœuille (2020) and Imai and Kim (2021) consider settings where units are treated at different times, but do not necessarily require that treatment is an absorbing state.”
From What's trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature (2023) · cites this paper as Imai and Kim (2021)
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Their estimators intuitively compare changes in outcomes for units whose treatment status changed to other units whose treatment status remained constant over the same periods.”
From What's trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature (2023) · cites this paper as Imai and Kim (2021)
Citations
Cites
How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates?
Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2004) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355304772839588 · Cited by 10,641 · cited 2×
“Another common justification is based on the fact that the 2FE estimator is equivalent to the difference-in-differences estimator under the simplest setting with two groups and two time periods (e.g., Bertrand, Duflo, and Mullainathan 2004; Angrist and Pischke 2009).”
MethodMostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009) · doi:10.1515/9781400829828 · Cited by 9,467 · cited 2×
“Our result is also related to that of Arkhangelsky et al. (2018) who shows that the weighted two-way fixed effects estimator can improve the synthetic control method of Abadie et al.”
MethodResultAbadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2010) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08746 · Cited by 5,513 · cited 1×
“Recently, a number of researchers have extended the synthetical control method of Abadie, Diamond, and Hainmueller (2010) to more general settings (e.g., Xu 2017; Ben-Michael, Feller, and Rothstein 2019).”
BackgroundTwo-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects
de Chaisemartin, C., & D’Haultfœuille, X. (2020) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20181169 · Cited by 5,031
Solon, G., Haider, S. J., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2015) · Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.3368/jhr.50.2.301 · Cited by 1,367
Generalized Synthetic Control Method: Causal Inference with Interactive Fixed Effects Models
Xu, Y. (2017) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1017/pan.2016.2 · Cited by 938 · cited 1×
“Recently, a number of researchers have extended the synthetical control method of Abadie, Diamond, and Hainmueller (2010) to more general settings (e.g., Xu 2017; Ben-Michael, Feller, and Rothstein 2019).”
BackgroundDesign-based analysis in Difference-In-Differences settings with staggered adoption
Athey, S., & Imbens, G. W. (2022) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.10.012 · Cited by 917 · cited 2×
“In addition, a number of scholars have recently considered causal interpretations of the standard 2FE estimator (see, e.g., Borusyak and Jaravel 2017; Abraham and Sun 2018; Athey and Imbens 2018; Chaisemartin and D’Haultfœuille 2018; Goodman-Bacon 2018).”
BackgroundDifference-in-Differences with Variation in Treatment Timing
Goodman-Bacon, A. (2018) · doi:10.3386/w25018 · Cited by 757
Revisiting Event Study Designs
Borusyak, K., & Jaravel, X. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2826228 · Cited by 463
When Should We Use Unit Fixed Effects Regression Models for Causal Inference with Longitudinal Data?
Imai, K., & Kim, I. (2019) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12417 · Cited by 407 · cited 5×
“Indeed, by extending the matching framework of Imai and Kim (2019), we show that the simultaneous adjustment for the two types of unobserved confounders cannot be done nonparametrically under the 2FE framework.”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing
Goodman-Bacon, A. (2021) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.03.014 · Cited by 8,046
How Much Should We Trust Staggered Difference-in-Differences Estimates?
Baker, A. C., Larcker, D. F., & Wang, C. C. Y. (2022) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2022.01.004 · Cited by 3,149
What's trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature
Roth, J., Sant’Anna, P. H. C., Bilinski, A., & Poe, J. (2023) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2023.03.008 · Cited by 2,027
How Much Should We Trust Staggered Difference-In-Differences Estimates?Preprint
Baker, A., Larcker, D. F., & Wang, C. C. Y. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3794018 · Cited by 670
“…where a treatment occurs across units at different points in time, 5The body of work examining these issues include: Athey and Imbens (2018), Borusyak and Jaravel (2017),Callaway and Sant’Anna (2020), Goodman-Bacon (2019), Imai and Kim (2020), Strezhnev (2018), and Sun and Abraham (2020).”
BackgroundTwo-way fixed effects and differences-in-differences with heterogeneous treatment effects: a survey
de Chaisemartin, C., & D’Haultfœuille, X. (2023) · The Econometrics Journal · doi:10.1093/ectj/utac017 · Cited by 522
Liu, L., Wang, Y., & Xu, Y. (2024) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12723 · Cited by 390
Matching Methods for Causal Inference with Time‐Series Cross‐Sectional Data
Imai, K., Kim, I. S., & Wang, E. H. (2023) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12685 · Cited by 349
Self-citationTwo-way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects
de Chaisemartin, C., & D'Haultfoeuille, X. (2019) · doi:10.3386/w25904 · Cited by 350
Two-stage differences in differences
Gardner, J. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.05943 · Cited by 333
Greenwashing behavior and firm value – From the perspective of board characteristics
Chen, P., & Dagestani, A. A. (2023) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.2488 · Cited by 307
Can Technology Solve the Principal-Agent Problem? Evidence from Chinaâ's War on Air Pollution
Greenstone, M., He, G., Jia, R., & Liu, T. (2020) · American Economic Review Insights · doi:10.1257/aeri.20200373 · Cited by 294
Systematic Evaluation of State Policy Interventions Targeting the US Opioid Epidemic, 2007-2018
Lee, B., Zhao, W., Yang, K.-C., Ahn, Y., & Perry, B. L. (2021) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36687 · Cited by 186
Sustainability or Greenwashing: Evidence from the Asset Market for Industrial Pollution
Duchin, R., Gao, J., & Xu, Q. (2024) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.13412 · Cited by 258
Education and Political Participation
Willeck, C., & Mendelberg, T. (2021) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-014235 · Cited by 209
Synthetic controls with staggered adoption.
Ben-Michael, E., Feller, A., & Rothstein, J. (2022) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/rssb.12448 · Cited by 120
The Effect of Job Loss and Unemployment Insurance on Crime in Brazil
Britto, D. G. C., Pinotti, P., & Sampaio, B. R. (2022) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta18984 · Cited by 110
Nothing to See Here? A Non‐Inferiority Approach to Parallel Trends
Bilinski, A., & Hatfield, L. A. (2026) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.70296 · Cited by 176
Dong, C., Zhou, R., & Li, J. (2020) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116007 · Cited by 107
Do Commodity Price Shocks Cause Armed Conflict? A Meta-Analysis of Natural Experiments
Blair, G., Christensen, D., & Rudkin, A. F. (2021) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055420000957 · Cited by 113
Sustainability or Greenwashing: Evidence from the Asset Market for Industrial PollutionPreprint
Duchin, R., Gao, J., & Xu, Q. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4095885 · Cited by 98
Scott, R. (2022) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102471 · Cited by 106
Neighborhood Externalities and Coordinated Rebuilding after Wildfires: Evidence from CaliforniaPreprint
Issler, P., Stanton, R., Vergara‐Alert, C., & Wallace, N. E. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3511843 · Cited by 85
Causal Inference With Observational Data and Unobserved Confounding Variables
Byrnes, J. E. K., & Dee, L. E. (2025) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.70023 · Cited by 111
“Solutions are evolving rapidly, including for heterogeneous effects (see Roth et al. 2023), nonlinearities (Imai and Kim 2021), and continuous causal variables (Callaway, Goodman-Bacon, and Sant'Anna 2024).”
Yoder, J. (2020) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055420000556 · Cited by 90
“The estimator, proposed in Imai and Kim (2020), is equivalent to a weighted version of the standard two-way fixed effects regression.”
MethodThe Correlates of State Policy and the Structure of State Panel Data
Grossmann, M., Jordan, M. P., & McCrain, J. (2021) · State Politics & Policy Quarterly · doi:10.1017/spq.2021.17 · Cited by 71
Two-Way Fixed Effects and Differences-in-Differences with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects: A Survey
de Chaisemartin, C., & D'Haultfoeuille, X. (2022) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w29734 · Cited by 70
Two-Way Fixed Effects and Differences-in-Differences with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects: A SurveyPreprint
de Chaisemartin, C., & D’Haultfœuille, X. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4034184 · Cited by 71
Chen, P., Dagestani, A. A., & Kim, S. (2023) · Technology Analysis and Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537325.2023.2196585 · Cited by 70
“However, these two unobserved confounders rely heavily on the assumption of linear additive e ff ects (Imai and Kim 2021), which needs further testing.”
Xiao, D., Yu, F., & Guo, C. (2022) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106770 · Cited by 71
Did border closures slow SARS-CoV-2?
Shiraef, M. A., Friesen, P., Feddern, L., Weiss, M. A., COBAP Team, Janabi, H. A., Beling, E., Falcone, J., Feddern, L., Hirst, C., et al. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-05482-7 · Cited by 60
Job Displacement, Unemployment Benefits and Domestic Violence
Bhalotra, S. R., Britto, D. G. C., Pinotti, P., & Sampaio, B. R. (2021) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdaf004 · Cited by 71
Panel Experiments and Dynamic Causal Effects: A Finite Population Perspective
Bojinov, I., Rambachan, A., & Shephard, N. (2021) · Quantitative Economics · doi:10.3982/qe1744 · Cited by 60
“For example, Sobel (2006), Athey and Imbens (2018), and Imai and Kim (2019a) study β̂TWFE in the causal literature on panel data models.”
BackgroundCirone, A. E., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2021) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-104325 · Cited by 67
The constrained politics of local public investment under cooperative federalism
Bremer, B., Carlo, D. D., & Wansleben, L. (2022) · Socio-Economic Review · doi:10.1093/ser/mwac026 · Cited by 60
On the causality and plausibility of treatment effects in operations management research
Mithas, S., Chen, Y., Lin, Y., & Silveira, A. D. O. (2022) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.13863 · Cited by 57
“Recent work provides new insights on the assumptions of unit FEs (e.g., Imai & Kim, 2019) and two-way FEs models (e.g., Imai & Kim, 2021) when one focuses attention on binary treatments.”
BackgroundCarnegie, A. S., & Carson, A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108778114 · Cited by 76
Economic freedom and foreign direct investment: Are they related?
Tağ, M. N., & Deği̇rmen, S. (2022) · Economic Analysis and Policy · doi:10.1016/j.eap.2021.12.020 · Cited by 58
Two-Way Fixed Effects and Differences-in-Differences with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects: A SurveyPreprint
de Chaisemartin, C., & D’Haultfœuille, X. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4021785 · Cited by 50
Causal models for longitudinal and panel data: a survey
Arkhangelsky, D., & Imbens, G. (2024) · The Econometrics Journal · doi:10.1093/ectj/utae014 · Cited by 50
Zor, S. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139815 · Cited by 49
Trauma and Turnout: The Political Consequences of Traumatic Events
Marsh, W. Z. C. (2022) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055422001010 · Cited by 51
Two-Way Fixed Effects and Differences-in-Differences with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects: A SurveyPreprint
de Chaisemartin, C., & D’Haultfœuille, X. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3980758 · Cited by 48
“The multi-period DID estimator in Imai and Kim (2021) is related to the DID M estimator.”
MethodDennison, J., & Kustov, A. (2023) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfad052 · Cited by 45
“Born for a Storm”: Hard-Right Social Media and Civil Unrest
Karell, D., Linke, A. M., Holland, E. C., & Hendrickson, E. (2023) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/00031224231156190 · Cited by 59
Behavioural nudges for water conservation in unequal settings: Experimental evidence from Cape Town
Brick, K., Martino, S. D., & Visser, M. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2023.102852 · Cited by 45
The Real Consequences of Symbolic Politics: Breaking the Soviet Past in Ukraine
Rozenas, A., & Vlasenko, A. (2021) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/718210 · Cited by 44
Interaction effects of market-based and incentive-driven low-carbon policies on carbon emissions
Jia, Z., & Wen, S. (2024) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107776 · Cited by 43
The Supply-Equity Trade-Off: The Effect of Spatial Representation on the Local Housing Supply
Hankinson, M., & Magazinnik, A. (2023) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/723818 · Cited by 40
Turunen, J., Karhula, K., Ropponen, A., Koskinen, A., Hakola, T., Puttonen, S., Hämäläinen, K., Pehkonen, J., & Härmä, M. (2020) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103716 · Cited by 39
Ambient air pollution associated with lower academic achievement among US children
Lu, W., Hackman, D. A., & Schwartz, J. D. (2021) · Environmental Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ee9.0000000000000174 · Cited by 1
Energy security and the shift to renewable resources: The case of Russia-Ukraine war
Nguyen, H. H., Nguyen, P. V., & Ngo, V. M. (2024) · The Extractive Industries and Society · doi:10.1016/j.exis.2024.101442 · Cited by 38
The effects of new energy vehicle subsidies on air quality: Evidence from China
Li, P., & Zhang, Z. (2023) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106624 · Cited by 39
Access to outpatient services in rural communities changes after hospital closure
Miller, K. E. M., Miller, K., Knocke, K., et al. (2021) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6773.13694 · Cited by 37
Making housing affordable? The local effects of relaxing land-use regulation
Büchler, S., & Lutz, E. C. (2024) · Journal of Urban Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jue.2024.103689 · Cited by 35
A panel data analysis of policy effectiveness for renewable energy expansion on Caribbean islands
Kersey, J., Blechinger, P., & Shirley, R. G. (2021) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112340 · Cited by 41
“A key constraint of the present work is that the regression specifications are limited in their ability to be causally interpreted in applied research (Imai and Kim, 2020).”
BackgroundThe impact of climate policy uncertainty on urban climate risk: Evidence from 274 cities in China
Zhang, H., Liu, J., Guo, Q., Zhang, X., & Hu, X. (2024) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2024.106097 · Cited by 35
Difference-in-Differences Designs: A Practitioner’s Guide
Baker, A., Callaway, B., Cunningham, S., Goodman-Bacon, A., & Sant’Anna, P. H. C. (2026) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20251650 · Cited by 149
He, Y., Wen, C., Fang, X., & Sun, X. M. (2024) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-024-01926-9 · Cited by 35
“Scholars always utilize this model to adjust for unobserved inherent individual or temporal attributes that have confounding effects (Imai and Kim 2021).”
Transparency in Structural Research
Andrews, I., Gentzkow, M. A., & Shapiro, J. M. (2020) · Journal of Business and Economic Statistics · doi:10.1080/07350015.2020.1796395 · Cited by 32
Heinzel, M., & Koenig‐Archibugi, M. (2023) · The Review of International Organizations · doi:10.1007/s11558-023-09510-7 · Cited by 33
“A2-A5, Table A3) (Blackwell & Glynn, 2018; De Chaisemartin & d’Haultfoeuille, 2020; Goodman-Bacon, 2021; Imai & Kim, 2021; Liu et al., 2022).”
Two-Way Fixed Effects and Differences-in-Differences with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects: A Survey
de Chaisemartin, C., & D'Haultfoeuille, X. (2022) · doi:10.3386/w29691 · Cited by 31
Fixed Effects and Causal InferencePreprint
Millimet, D. L., & Bellemare, M. F. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4467963 · Cited by 32
Rare and highly destructive wildfires drive human migration in the U.S.
McConnell, K., Fussell, E., DeWaard, J., Whitaker, S. D., Curtis, K. J., Denis, L. A. S., Balch, J. K., & Price, K. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-50630-4 · Cited by 41
Public-Private Governance Initiatives and Corporate Responses to Stakeholder Complaints
Thrall, C. (2021) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818321000199 · Cited by 31
“Imai and Kim 2020.”
Liu, X., Liu, Z., Zhu, Z., & Qiao, R. (2024) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111618 · Cited by 32
Egami, N., & Yamauchi, S. (2022) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1017/pan.2022.8 · Cited by 38
“Examples include Dube, Dube, and García-Ponce (2013), Truex (2014), Earle and Gehlbach (2015), Hall (2016), and Larreguy and Marshall (2017). Another is to stick with the two-time-period DID and limit the use of additional pre-treatment periods only to the assessment of pre-treatment trends.”
Stokes, J., Bower, P., Guthrie, B., Mercer, S. W., Rice, N., Ryan, A. M., & Sutton, M. (2022) · The Lancet Regional Health - Europe · doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100436 · Cited by 30
Testing the backlash argument: voter responses to (pro-)immigration reforms
Kustov, A. (2022) · Journal of European Public Policy · doi:10.1080/13501763.2022.2061034 · Cited by 28
“…however, has been recently challenged by some scholars who point out to the unclear counterfactual interpretation of twoway FEs and the impossibility of simultaneously adjusting for unit-specific and time-specific confounders in a nonparametric way (Kropko & Kubinec, 2020; Imai & Kim, 2021).”
BackgroundDong, H., Tao, M., Wang, J., & Baiocchi, G. (2024) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.3063 · Cited by 31
Lu, W., Levin, R., & Schwartz, J. (2021) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-021-12474-1 · Cited by 26
Unexpected events during survey design and trust in the police: a systematic review
Nägel, C., & Nivette, A. E. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-022-09508-y · Cited by 31
“We recommend to adjust for unobserved unit-specific and time-specific confounders using a two-way-fixed-effects modeling strategy even though this does not represent a design-based estimation strategy (Imai and Kim 2021) that can yield similar confidence in the results as the straightforward UESD.”
Uncovering Latent Biases in Text: Method and Application to Peer Review
Manzoor, E., & Shah, N. B. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i6.16608 · Cited by 28
“(5) is typically estimated using a “two-way fixed-effects” regression (Imai and Kim, 2020) on peer reviews from the years tSB and tDB:”
MethodRural household energy transition in China: Trends and challenges
Zhang, X., Barrington-Leigh, C. P., & Robinson, B. E. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141871 · Cited by 25
Extreme weather events do not increase political parties' environmental attention
Wappenhans, T., Valentim, A., Klüver, H., et al. (2024) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-024-02024-z · Cited by 25
“25, allowing for both staggered and repeated treatment exposure.”
Does Transparency Inhibit Political Compromise?
Harden, J. J., & Kirkland, J. H. (2020) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12564 · Cited by 28
How Exile Shapes Online Opposition: Evidence from Venezuela
Esberg, J., & Siegel, A. A. (2022) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055422001290 · Cited by 33
“…has also raised concerns about the causal interpretation of two-way fixed effects difference-in-differences designs with staggered treat-ment timing when effects are heterogenous across time (which is often likely to be the case; Brantly and Sant ’ Anna 2021; Goodman-Bacon 2021; Imai and Kim 2020).”
Secrets in Global Governance : Disclosure Dilemmas and the Challenge of International Cooperation
Carnegie, A. S., & Carson, A. (2020) · Cited by 24
Does Abortion Liberalisation Accelerate Fertility Decline? A Worldwide Time-Series Analysis
Fernández, J. J., & Juif, D. (2023) · European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie · doi:10.1007/s10680-023-09687-y · Cited by 26
“In the TWFE model, changes in abortion policy index 1 are positively related to increases in fertility rates (model 1).”
MethodInfluentialThe effect of digital transformation: Boosting productivity in the restaurant industry
Lee, W., Jang, S. S., & Kim, H. S. (2024) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2024.103896 · Cited by 42
Causal graphical views of fixed effects and random effects models
Kim, Y., & Steiner, P. M. (2020) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bmsp.12217 · Cited by 26
Effects of state opioid prescribing cap laws on opioid prescribing after surgery
Schmid, I. T., Stuart, E. A., McCourt, A. D., Tormohlen, K. N., Stone, E. M., Davis, C. S., Bicket, M. C., & McGinty, E. E. (2022) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6773.14023 · Cited by 24
Synthetic Controls with Staggered Adoption
Ben‐Michael, E., Feller, A., & Rothstein, J. (2021) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w28886 · Cited by 24
Perceived group discrimination and the integration paradox in stigmatized neighborhoods
Esaiasson, P., Lajevardi, N., & Sohlberg, J. (2023) · Politics Groups and Identities · doi:10.1080/21565503.2023.2227438 · Cited by 23
“Two-way fi xed e ff ects regressions are sometimes problematic because of the assumption of linear additive e ff ects (Imai and Kim 2021).”
Ren, Y., Tian, Y., & Zhang, C. (2021) · Environment Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-021-01971-3 · Cited by 23
Tiscornia, L. (2023) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/00223433221128846 · Cited by 23
“Even though the inclusion of fixed effects is a common strategy to capture unobserved time-invariant confounders, recent research suggests that this strategy might be insufficient to identify causal effects in dynamic settings (Imai & Kim, 2021).”
BackgroundElectric vehicle adoption and local PM2.5 reduction: Evidence from China
Wu, Y., Гу, Ф., Ji, Y., Ma, S.-C., & Guo, J. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136508 · Cited by 24
Air pollution and internal migration: evidence from an Iranian household survey
Farzanegan, M. R., Gholipour, H. F., & Javadian, M. (2022) · Empirical Economics · doi:10.1007/s00181-022-02253-1 · Cited by 22
Morales, L. F., Bonilla‐Mejía, L., Pulido, J. D., Flórez, L. A., Hermida, D., Mahecha, K. L. P., & Lasso-Valderrama, F. J. (2022) · Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique · doi:10.1111/caje.12549 · Cited by 22
Inviting oversight: Effects of forest certification on deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon
Rana, P., & Sills, E. O. (2023) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106418 · Cited by 26
Pipeline or Pipedream: Gender Balance Legislation’s Effect on Women’s Presence in State Government
McQueen, S. (2021) · State Politics & Policy Quarterly · doi:10.1017/spq.2020.8 · Cited by 20
Exploring EU’s Regional Potential in Low-Carbon Technologies
Bergamini, E., & Zachmann, G. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13010032 · Cited by 20
The short and long-run effects of international environmental agreements on trade
Ederington, J., Paraschiv, M., & Zanardi, M. (2022) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2022.103685 · Cited by 19
Politicians’ Private Sector Jobs and Parliamentary Behavior
Weschle, S. (2022) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12721 · Cited by 19
Sun, Y., Zhang, J., Han, J., & Zhang, Q. (2023) · Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility · doi:10.1111/beer.12564 · Cited by 19
Accrual and real earnings management by rumored takeover targets
Davis, F. J., & Khadivar, H. (2024) · International Review of Financial Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103105 · Cited by 24
On Inference When Using State Corporate Laws for IdentificationPreprint
Spamann, H. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3499101 · Cited by 17
Voice Analytics of Online InfluencersPreprint
Hwang, S., Liu, X., & Srinivasan, K. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3773825 · Cited by 17
Causal Models for Longitudinal and Panel Data: A Survey
Arkhangelsky, D., & Imbens, G. W. (2023) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w31942 · Cited by 22
Newman, A. L., & Zhang, Q. (2023) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290.2023.2267051 · Cited by 20
“The TWFE model, with two groups and two periods (pre-and during sanctions), is equivalent to difference-in-differences (DiD) estimators (de Chaisemartin & D’Haultfoeuille, 2022; Imai & Kim, 2021).”
MethodZhang, L., & Wen, S. (2024) · Resources Policy · doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105091 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Imai, K., & Kim, I. S.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kim, In Song
- Venue
- Political Analysis
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2020-11-12
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 405-415
- ISSN
- 1047-1987 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4989
- OpenAlex
- W3098174737
- Semantic Scholar
- 660ac5f400de68ad64a9f31370bc59a30ec98d22
- Cited by
- 623
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 105 · 2025: 142 · 2024: 126 · 2023: 92 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 30
- FWCI
- 42.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Political Analysis (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Keywords
- causal inference, panel data, difference-in-differences, unmeasured confounding, negative weights, design-based estimation, model assumptions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
