Cited by 84Social Media and PoliticsMedia Influence and PoliticsPolitical Conflict and Governance

Elites Tweet to Get Feet Off the Streets: Measuring Regime Social Media Strategies During Protest

Open access
Munger, Kevin, Bonneau, Richard, Nagler, Jonathan, Tucker, Joshua A.·2019·Political Science Research and Methods

Abstract

As non-democratic regimes have adapted to the proliferation of social media, they have began actively engaging with Twitter to enhance regime resilience. Using data taken from the Twitter accounts of Venezuelan legislators during the 2014 anti-Maduro protests in Venezuela, we fit a topic model on the text of the tweets and analyze patterns in hashtag use by the two coalitions. We argue that the regime’s best strategy in the face of an existential threat like the narrative developed by La Salida and promoted on Twitter was to advance many competing narratives that addressed issues unrelated to the opposition’s criticism. Our results show that the two coalitions pursued different rhetorical strategies in keeping with our predictions about managing the conflict advanced by the protesters. This article extends the literature on social media use during protests by focusing on active engagement with social media on the part of the regime. This approach corroborates and expands on recent research on inferring regime strategies from propaganda and censorship.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/psrm.2018.3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Authoritarian, and sometimes democratic, governments have sought to control conventional media through censorship, state-based media systems, synergy between censorship and state media, and cooperation with or pressure on private media producers.

    “Authoritarian, and sometimes democratic (112), governments have sought to control conventional media, including through censorship (113, 114), state-based media systems (115, 116), the synergy between censorship and state media (117, 118), and cooperation with (or pressure on) private media producers (119, 120).”

    From Physical and virtual repertoires of contention (2022) · cites this paper as [116]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 35 · Cited by 84

Authors
Munger, K., Bonneau, R., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. A.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Venue
Political Science Research and Methods
Published
2018-03-21
Volume
7
Issue
04
Pages
815-834
ISSN
  • 2049-8470 (ISSN-L)
  • 2049-8489
OpenAlex
W2790304980
Cited by
84
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
18.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Political Science Research and Methods (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1248077)
  • York University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
Keywords
Twitter, regime resilience, hashtag use, political rhetoric, regime propaganda, non-democratic regimes, Venezuela

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review