The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace
Abstract
Sebastian Rosato (2003) finds the logic of the “democratic peace” flawed in his “The Flawed Logic of Democratic Peace Theory,” and he cites my work and other studies as examples of the flawed logic. Some of the logic he describes is flawed, and it may characterize some of the literature in the wide field of “democratic peace,” but it is not the logic underlying the core of liberal peace theory. Indeed, the persuasive core of the logic underlying the theory of liberal democratic peace is missing from Rosato's account. Republican representation, an ideological commitment to fundamental human rights, and transnational interdependence are the three pillars of the explanation. The logic underlying the peace among liberal states rests on a simple and straightforward proposition that connects those three causal mechanisms as they operate together and only together, and not separately as Sebastian Rosato claims.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes
Fearon, J. D. (1994) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2944796 · Cited by 2,360
(2018) · National and International Security · doi:10.4324/9781315184517-8 · Cited by 1,238
Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs*
Doyle, M. W. (2017) · Immanuel Kant · doi:10.4324/9781315252629-22 · Cited by 1,224
Self-citationDoyle, M. W. (1986) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055400185041 · Cited by 1,094
Self-citationInvesting in the Peace: Economic Interdependence and International Conflict
Gartzke, E., Li, Q., & Boehmer, C. (2001) · International Organization · doi:10.1162/00208180151140612 · Cited by 554
Mirror, Mirror on the Wall...: Are the Freer Countries More Pacific?
Chan, S. (1984) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002784028004003 · Cited by 543
The Flawed Logic of Democratic Peace Theory
ROSATO, S. (2003) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055403000893 · Cited by 535
Schmitz, M. (2004) · Philosophen · doi:10.1007/978-3-476-02949-2_48 · Cited by 504
Domestic Opposition and Signaling in International Crises
Schultz, K. A. (1998) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2586306 · Cited by 492
The Cult of the Offensive and the Origins of the First World War
Evera, S. V. (1984) · International Security · doi:10.2307/2538636 · Cited by 442
Cited by
Gerring, J. (2010) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414010376911 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- DOYLE, M. W.
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 463-466
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W2071966441
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 21.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0003055405051798
- The paper
- DOYLE, M. W. (2005). Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace. American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055405051798
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.