Cited by 343Political Conflict and GovernanceMiddle East and Rwanda ConflictsSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Deference, Dissent, and Dispute Resolution: An Experimental Intervention Using Mass Media to Change Norms and Behavior in Rwanda

PALUCK, ELIZABETH LEVY, GREEN, DONALD P.·2009·American Political Science Review

Abstract

Deference and dissent strike a delicate balance in any polity. Insufficient deference to authority may incapacitate government, whereas too much may allow leaders to orchestrate mass violence. Although cross-national and cross-temporal variation in deference to authority and willingness to express dissent has long been studied in political science, rarely have scholars studied programs designed to change these aspects of political culture. This study, situated in post-genocide Rwanda, reports a qualitative and quantitative assessment of one such attempt, a radio program aimed at discouraging blind obedience and reliance on direction from authorities and promoting independent thought and collective action in problem solving. Over the course of one year, this radio program or a comparable program dealing with HIV was randomly presented to pairs of communities, including communities of genocide survivors, Twa people, and imprisoned génocidaires. Changes in individual attitudes, perceived community norms, and deliberative behaviors were assessed using closed-ended interviews, focus group discussions, role-play exercises, and unobtrusive measures of collective decision making. Although the radio program had little effect on many kinds of beliefs and attitudes, it had a substantial impact on listeners' willingness to express dissent and the ways they resolved communal problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0003055409990128

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Rwanda, a radio drama treatment changed listeners' perceptions of social norms and their behaviors in domains including intermarriage, open dissent, trust, empathy, cooperation, and trauma healing, compared with a control group.

    “Compared with listeners in the control group, treatment group listeners’ perceptions of social norms and their behaviors changed in a range of domains: intermarriage, open dissent, trust, empathy, cooperation, and trauma healing.”

    From Stories in Action. (2022) · cites this paper as Paluck & Green, 2009

  • The Rwandan radio drama treatment did not appear to change listeners' personal beliefs with respect to intergroup violence.

    “Despite this, the treatment did not appear to change listeners’ personal beliefs with respect to intergroup violence.”

    From Stories in Action. (2022) · cites this paper as Paluck & Green, 2009

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 100 · Cited by 343

Authors
PALUCK, E. L., & GREEN, D. P.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
  • PALUCK, ELIZABETH LEVY
  • GREEN, DONALD P.
Venue
American Political Science Review
Published
2009-10-14
Volume
103
Issue
4
Pages
622-644
ISSN
  • 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5943
OpenAlex
W2113212369
Cited by
343
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
FWCI
27.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Political Science Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
deference to authority, dissent, radio programming, mass media interventions, political culture change, post-genocide Rwanda, genocide survivors, group decision making, community norms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review