Does Combat Experience Foster Organizational Skill? Evidence from Ethnic Cleansing during the Partition of South Asia
Open accessAbstract
Can combat experience foster organizational skills that engender political collective action? We use the arbitrary assignment of troops to combat in World War II to identify the effect of combat experience on two channels that change local ethnic composition and future political control: ethnic cleansing and co-ethnic immigration. During the Partition of South Asia, we find that ethnically mixed districts whose veterans were exposed to greater combat exhibited greater co-ethnic immigration and minority ethnic cleansing, with minority out-migration achieved with lower loss-of-life. Further, where ethnic groups had been in complementary economic roles or the minority received greater combat experience, there was less ethnic cleansing. We interpret these results as reflecting the strategic role of ethnic cleansing and co-ethnic immigration by groups seeking political control and the role of combat experience in enhancing organizational skills at credibly threatening violence and engaging in collective action.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Higher levels of partition-related violence led to greater outflow of evacuees.
“The higher levels of partition-related violence in turn led to greater outflow of evacuees in such districts.”
From Displacement and development: Long term impacts of population transfer in India (2019) · cites this paper as Jha and Wilkinson, 2012
Districts with a higher presence of demobilised soldiers with frontline combat experience suffered from greater levels of partition-related violence.
“The study shows that districts that had a higher presence of demobilised soldiers with frontline combat experience suffered from greater levels of partition-related violence.”
From Displacement and development: Long term impacts of population transfer in India (2019) · cites this paper as Jha and Wilkinson, 2012
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 83 · Cited by 162
- Authors
- JHA, S., & WILKINSON, S.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- JHA, SAUMITRA
- WILKINSON, STEVEN
- ORCID
- JHA, SAUMITRA
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2012-10-31
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 883-907
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W3123473204
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 83
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 24.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- American Political Science Review (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › South Asian Studies and Conflicts
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Keywords
- combat exposure, organizational skills, ethnic cleansing, ethnic composition, political control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review