The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Killing in the Slums: Social Order, Criminal Governance, and Police Violence in Rio de Janeiro
Abstract
State interventions against organized criminal groups (OCGs) sometimes work to improve security, but often exacerbate violence. To understand why, this article offers a theory about criminal governance in five types of criminal regimes—Insurgent, Bandit, Symbiotic, Predatory, and Split. These differ according to whether criminal groups confront or collude with state actors, abuse or cooperate with the community, and hold a monopoly or contest territory with rival OCGs. Police interventions in these criminal regimes pose different challenges and are associated with markedly different local security outcomes. We provide evidence of this theory by using a multimethod research design combining quasi-experimental statistical analyses, automated text analysis, extensive qualitative research, and a large-N survey in the context of Rio de Janeiro’s “Pacifying Police Units” (UPPs), which sought to reclaim control of the favelas from criminal organizations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development
Olson, M. (1993) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2938736 · Cited by 3,794
The Logic of Violence in Civil War
Kalyvas, S. N. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818462 · Cited by 3,314
Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts
Grimmer, J., & Stewart, B. M. (2013) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mps028 · Cited by 3,297 · cited 1×
“Following Grimmer and Stewart (2013), we rely on a rule-based method to classify each call into our typology of criminal behavior.”
MethodThe Logic of Violence in Civil War
(2006) · The Logic of Violence in Civil War · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818462.001 · Cited by 2,402
Insurgent citizenship: disjunctions of democracy and modernity in Brazil
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-2840 · Cited by 1,389
The rational peasant: The political economy of peasant society
Popkin, S. (1980) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1007/bf00158397 · Cited by 1,280
What is Procedural Justice?: Criteria Used by Citizens to Assess the Fairness of Legal Procedures
Tyler, T. R. (1988) · Law & Society Review · doi:10.2307/3053563 · Cited by 912
Insurgent Citizenship: Disjunctions of Democracy and Modernity in Brazil
Lazar, S. (2009) · Hispanic American Historical Review · doi:10.1215/00182168-2009-076 · Cited by 904
Rebel rulers: insurgent governance and civilian life during war
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-4716 · Cited by 897
Comparative Political Studies: a new quarterly journal
(1969) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/000276426901200311 · Cited by 757
Cited by
Administrative Records Mask Racially Biased Policing
KNOX, D., LOWE, W., & MUMMOLO, J. (2020) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055420000039 · Cited by 314
Causal Panel Analysis under Parallel Trends: Lessons from a Large Reanalysis Study
CHIU, A., LAN, X., LIU, Z., & XU, Y. (2026) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055425000243 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- MAGALONI, B., FRANCO-VIVANCO, E., & MELO, V.
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2020-02-03
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 552-572
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W2901602392
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 44.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Killing in the Slums: Social Order, Criminal Governance, and Police Violence in Rio de Janeiro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0003055419000856
- The paper
- MAGALONI, B., FRANCO-VIVANCO, E., & MELO, V. (2020). Killing in the Slums: Social Order, Criminal Governance, and Police Violence in Rio de Janeiro. American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055419000856
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.