The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Has ethnoarchaeology come of age?
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The implications of this study appeal to wider debates in archaeology and (ceramic) ethnoarchaeology that call for a transformation in knowledge production.
“When viewed using a global lens, the implications of this study appeal to wider debates in archaeology, and (ceramic) ethnoarchaeology that calls for a transformation in knowledge production (i.e. Hall, 1983; Dietler and Herbich, 1989; Stahl, 1995; Ndoro, 1996; Stark, 2003; Karega-Munene and Schmidt, 2010; Lane, 2011; Pikirayi, 2015; Chirikure, 2016, Chirikure, 2020; Cunningham and MacEachern, 201”
From Nyanga pottery and the Manyika ethnohistory: towards a decolonised archaeology of the Nyanga agricultural complex (2021) · cites this paper as Stahl, 1995
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Kleindienst, 1956, ‘Action archeology’: the archeological inventory of a living community, Anthropology Tomorrow, 5, 75
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-003108-5.50008-7 · DOI
- Stahl, 1994, Change and continuity in the Banda Area, Ghana: the direct historical approach, Journal of Field Archaeology, 21, 181, 10.1179/009346994791547670 · DOI
- 10.1080/02698598808573311 · DOI
- 10.2307/281967 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nyamushosho, R. T., Chipangura, N., Pasipanodya, T. B., Bandama, F., Chirikure, S., & Manyanga, M. (2021) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06609 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Stahl, A. B.
- Venue
- Antiquity
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 263
- Pages
- 404-407
- ISSN
- 0003-598X
- 1745-1744
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
