CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 10

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Iron and cloth across the Bay of Bengal: new data from Tha Kae, central Thailand

Cameron, Judith·2011·Antiquity
DOI 10.1017/s0003598x00067946
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

An important group of spindle whorls found at Tha Kae in Thailand carries traces suggesting the use of iron spindles, and includes an unusual type of whorl shaped like a door knob. The author explores the implied contacts reaching into south China, but is also able to add a probable link with India in the early first millennium AD, well in advance of the better known Dvaravati period (sixth–thirteenth centuries AD).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0003598x00067946

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Cameron, 1990, South Asian archaeology: proceedings of the first conference of the Association of Southeast Asian Archaeologists in western Europe, 139
  2. Bellina, 2004, Southeast Asia: from prehistory to history, 68
  3. Cameron, 2000, Asbestos cloth and elites in Southeast Asia, Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association, 19, 47
  4. Cameron, 2011, The origins of the civilizations of Angkor. Volume 5. The excavation of Ban Non Wat: the Bronze Age, 492
  5. 10.1006/jasc.2001.0779 · DOI
  6. Macauley, 1890, The History of Herodotus
  7. Rispoli, 1992, Southeast Asian archaeology 1990: proceedings of the third Conference of the European Association of Southeast Asian Archaeologists, 129
  8. Cameron, 2001, The archaeology of Lapita dispersal in Oceania: papers from the fourth Lapita conference, June 2000, Canberra, Australia, 177
  9. Bellwood, 1997, Prehistory of the Indo-Malaysian Archipelago, 10.1515/9780824874681 · DOI
  10. Barber, 1991, Prehistoric textiles: the development of cloth in the Neolithic and Bronze Ages with special reference to the Aegean, 10.1515/9780691201412 · DOI
  11. Ciarla, 1992, Southeast Asian archaeology 1990: proceedings of the third conference of the European Association of Southeast Asian Archaeologists, 111
  12. Moorti, 1994, Megalithic culture of south India: socio–economic perspective.
  13. Higham, 2010, 50 Years of Archaeology in Southeast Asia: essays in honour of Ian Glover, 129
  14. Higham, 1996, The Bronze Age of Southeast Asia.
  15. 10.1017/S0003598X00087500 · DOI
  16. Cameron J. 2002. Textile technology in the prehistory of Southeast Asia. Unpublished PhD dissertation, The Australian National University.
  17. Kuhn, 1988, Science and civilisation in China, 5
  18. Mårtensson, 2005, Technical report experimental archaeology. Part 1
  19. Ray, 2003, The archaeology of seafaring in ancient South Asia.
  20. Glover, 1989, Early trade between India and Southeast Asia—a link in the development of a world trading system
  21. Cameron, Archaeology in the Batanes Islands: the early movements of the Austronesian-speaking populations
  22. Cameron, 2010, 50 years of archaeology in Southeast Asia: essays in honour of IanGlover, 141
  23. Fuller, 2008, Linguistics, archaeology and the human past in South Asia, 1
  24. Mårtensson, 2006, Technical report experimental archaeology. Part 2:1 flax.
  25. Rajan, 1994, Archaeology of Tamilnadu (Kongu Country)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 10

Metadata

Authors
Cameron, J.
Venue
Antiquity
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2011-05
Volume
85
Issue
328
Pages
559-567
ISSN
  • 0003-598X
  • 1745-1744
DOI
10.1017/s0003598x00067946
Cited by
10
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 1342 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review