Conodont affinity and chordate phylogeny
Abstract
Current information on the conodonts Clydagnathus windsorensis (Globensky) and Promissum pulchrum Kovács-Endrödy, together with the latest interpretations of conodont hard tissues, are reviewed and it is concluded that sufficient evidence exists to justify interpretation of the conodonts on a chordate model. A new phylogenetic analysis is undertaken, consisting of 17 chordate taxa and 103 morphological, physiological and biochemical characters; conodonts are included as a primary taxon. Various experiments with character coding, taxon deletion and the use of constraint trees are carried out. We conclude that conodonts are cladistically more derived than either hagfishes or lampreys because they possess a mineralised dermal skeleton and that they are the most plesiomorphic member of the total group Gnathostomata. We discuss the evolution of the nervous and sensory systems and the skeleton in the context of our optimal phylogenetic tree. There appears to be no simple evolution of free to canal-enclosed neuromasts; organised neuromasts within canals appear to have arisen at least three times from free neuromasts or neuromasts arranged within grooves. The mineralised vertebrate skeleton first appeared as odontodes of dentine or dentine plus enamel in the paraconodont/euconodont feeding apparatus. Bone appeared later, co-ordinate with the development of a dermal skeleton, and it appears to have been primitively acellular. Atubular dentine is more primitive than tubular dentine. However, the subsequent distribution of the different types of dentine (e.g. mesodentine, orthodentine), suggests that these tissue types are homoplastic. The topology of relationships and known stratigraphic ranges of taxa in our phylogeny predict the existence of myxinoids and petromyzontids in the Cambrian.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Conodonts are regarded as the earliest known biomineralized chordates.
“They are regarded as the earliest known biomineralized chordates (Donoghue, Forey & Aldridge, 2000; Donoghue, Sansom & Downs, 2006).”
From Chronology of early Cambrian biomineralization (2012) · cites this paper as Donoghue, Forey & Aldridge, 2000
Cites
Wada, H., Saiga, H., Satoh, N., & Holland, P. W. H. (1998) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.125.6.1113 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Szaniawski, H., & Bengtson, S. (1993) · Journal of Paleontology · doi:10.1017/s0022336000024963 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The origin and early phylogenetic history of jawed vertebrates
Brazeau, M. D., & Friedman, M. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14438 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Chronology of early Cambrian biomineralization
KOUCHINSKY, A., BENGTSON, S., RUNNEGAR, B., SKOVSTED, C., STEINER, M., & VENDRASCO, M. (2012) · Geological Magazine · doi:10.1017/s0016756811000720 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Donoghue, P. C. J., Sansom, I. J., & Downs, J. P. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution · doi:10.1002/jez.b.21090 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Self-citationDarwin's dilemma: the realities of the Cambrian ‘explosion’
Conway Morris, S. (2006) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1846 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
New evidence on the anatomy and phylogeny of the earliest vertebrates
Xian-guang, H., Aldridge, R. J., Siveter, D. J., Siveter, D. J., & Xiang-hong, F. (2002) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2104 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Self-citationInnovation not recovery: dynamic redox promotes metazoan radiations
Wood, R., & Erwin, D. H. (2018) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12375 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
The scientific status of metazoan cladistics: why current research practice must change
Jenner, R. A. (2004) · Zoologica Scripta · doi:10.1111/j.0300-3256.2004.00153.x · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Lacalli, T. C. (2001) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2001.0974 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Landing, E., English, A., & Keppie, J. D. (2010) · Geology · doi:10.1130/g30870.1 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
The mouth, the anus, and the blastopore—open questions about questionable openings
Hejnol, A., & Martindale, M. Q. (2009) · Animal Evolution · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199549429.003.0004 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Genomic, phylogenetic, and cell biological insights into metazoan origins
Nichols, S. A., Dayel, M. J., & King, N. (2009) · Animal Evolution · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199549429.003.0003 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
- Authors
- DONOGHUE, P. C. J., FOREY, P. L., & ALDRIDGE, R. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- Natural History Museum (GB)
- University of Leicester (GB)
- Venue
- Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 191-251
- ISSN
- 0006-3231 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162521529
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 13.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
- Keywords
- conodonts, chordate phylogeny, Gnathostomata, hagfish, lamprey, odontodes, neuromasts, nervous system evolution, sensory system evolution, Cambrian, character encoding, constraint tree
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Chordata, Nonvertebrate, Fossils, Muscles, Phylogeny
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review