Cited by 174Probiotics and Fermented FoodsLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthReproductive tract infections research

Cholesterol-lowering efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum CECT 7527, 7528 and 7529 in hypercholesterolaemic adults

Open access
Fuentes, Mari C., Lajo, Teresa, Carrión, Juan M., Cuñé, Jordi·2013·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Previous studies have indicated that supplementation with probiotic bacteria may improve lipid metabolism. The present study was aimed at investigating the effects of a mixture of three strains of Lactobacillus plantarum (CECT 7527, CECT 7528 and CECT 7529) on cholesterol-lowering efficacy in hypercholesterolaemic patients. A total of sixty volunteers (thirty participants in the placebo group and thirty counterparts in the L. plantarum group), aged 18–65 years old, participated in a controlled, randomised, double-blind trial. The study group received one capsule daily containing 1·2 × 10 9 colony-forming units of Lactobacillus strains in a unique dose; the placebo group consumed the same product without bacteria for 12 weeks. A significant reduction of 13·6 % in plasma total cholesterol (TC) levels was observed after 12 weeks of consumption in the L. plantarum group when compared with the placebo group. The lipidic outcomes were also analysed based on TC values at baseline: low initial values (LIV, 2000–2500 mg/l) v . high initial values (HIV, 2510–3000 mg/l). In the HIV group, the L. plantarum treatment showed a reduction after 12 weeks of consumption compared with the placebo group in TC, LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) and oxidised LDL-C (17·4, 17·6 and 15·6 %, respectively). In the LIV, the L. plantarum treatment only showed a reduction after 12 weeks of consumption when compared with the placebo group in TC (9·4 %). The present results showed that the biofunctionality of L. plantarum (CECT 7527, CECT 7528 and CECT 7529) is proportional to the cardiovascular risk of the patient, having a better effect in patients with higher levels of cholesterol.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s000711451200373x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 24 · Cited by 174

Authors
Fuentes, M. C., Lajo, T., Carrión, J. M., & Cuñé, J.
Affiliations
AB-Biotics (Spain) (ES)
Corresponding author
Cuñé, Jordi
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2012-09-28
Volume
109
Issue
10
Pages
1866-1872
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2150941444
Cited by
174
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
FWCI
8.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Centro para el Desarrollo Tecnológico Industrial
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
Lactobacillus plantarum, probiotics, hypercholesterolemia, cholesterol-lowering effect, plasma total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, lipid metabolism, cardiovascular risk
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anticholesteremic Agents, Cholesterol, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hypercholesterolemia, Lipoproteins, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Species Specificity, Stem Cells, Probiotics, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus plantarum, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review