Cited by 126Phytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesPomegranate: compositions and health benefitsNutritional Studies and Diet

Phenolic sulfates as new and highly abundant metabolites in human plasma after ingestion of a mixed berry fruit purée

Open access
Pimpão, Rui C., Ventura, M. Rita, Ferreira, Ricardo B., Williamson, Gary, Santos, Claudia N.·2015·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Bioavailability studies are vital to assess the potential impact of bioactive compounds on human health. Although conjugated phenolic metabolites derived from colonic metabolism have been identified in the urine, the quantification and appearance of these compounds in plasma is less well studied. In this regard, it is important to further assess their potential biological activity in vivo. To address this gap, a cross-over intervention study with a mixed fruit purée (blueberry, blackberry, raspberry, strawberry tree fruit and Portuguese crowberry) and a standard polyphenol-free meal was conducted in thirteen volunteers (ten females and three males), who received each test meal once, and plasma metabolites were identified by HPLC–MS/MS. Sulfated compounds were chemically synthesised and used as standards to facilitate quantification. Gallic and caffeic acid conjugates were absorbed rapidly, reaching a maximum concentration between 1 and 2 h. The concentrations of sulfated metabolites resulting from the colonic degradation of more complex polyphenols increased in plasma from 4 h, and pyrogallol sulfate and catechol sulfate reached concentrations ranging from 5 to 20 μ m at 6 h. In conclusion, phenolic sulfates reached high concentrations in plasma, as opposed to their undetected parent compounds. These compounds have potential use as biomarkers of polyphenol intake, and their biological activities need to be considered.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0007114514003511

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 126

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. 10.1124/dmd.109.028019 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/mnfr.200800461 · DOI
  3. 10.1124/dmd.110.036566 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/mnfr.201300822 · DOI
  5. 10.1021/pr300581s · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.3390/ijms11041679 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/mnfr.201200021 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/s11130-010-0177-1 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/mnfr.201300322 · DOI
  10. 10.1124/dmd.111.039651 · DOI
  11. 10.2174/138920011797470100 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.jchromb.2007.05.042 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/s11095-013-1007-6 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2009.09.001 · DOI
  15. 10.1021/jf049595y · DOI
  16. 10.1017/S0007114510003946 · DOI
  17. 10.1021/np0000421 · DOI
  18. 10.3945/ajcn.112.049247 · DOI
  19. 10.3109/09637486.2013.816938 · DOI
  20. Shahrzad, 2001, Pharmacokinetics of gallic acid and its relative bioavailability from tea in healthy humans, J Nutr, 131, 1207, 10.1093/jn/131.4.1207 · DOI
  21. 10.1039/c0ob00137f · DOI
  22. 10.1002/mnfr.201300349 · DOI
  23. Muskiet, 1979, Urinary excretion of conjugated homovanillic acid, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, p-hydroxyphenylacetic acid, and vanillic acid by persons on their usual diet and patients with neuroblastoma, Clin Chem, 25, 1281, 10.1093/clinchem/25.7.1281 · DOI
  24. 10.1021/jf305498j · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.mam.2010.09.007 · DOI
  26. 10.1039/C2FO30151B · DOI
  27. 10.1039/c0fo00132e · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.bcp.2012.08.009 · DOI
  29. 10.1124/dmd.104.000992 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/mnfr.201100566 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)00407-X · DOI

Authors
Pimpão, R. C., Ventura, M. R., Ferreira, R. B., Williamson, G., & Santos, C. N.
Affiliations
  • Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica (PT)
  • Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2015-01-09
Volume
113
Issue
3
Pages
454-463
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2163481817
Cited by
126
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3
FWCI
8.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Universidade de Lisboa
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (322467)
  • FP7 Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, Biotechnology (265942)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Pomegranate: compositions and health benefits
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
plasma metabolites, polyphenol bioavailability, colonic metabolism, blueberry, blackberry, raspberry
MeSH terms
Adult, Catechols, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Diet, Female, Fruit, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Phenols, Pyrogallol, Sulfates, Cross-Over Studies, Blueberry Plants, Fragaria, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Polyphenols, Rubus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review