The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Corporatism and Consensus Democracy in Eighteen Countries: Conceptual and Empirical Linkages
Abstract
This research Note has two complementary theoretical objectives. First, we shall attempt to place the form of interest representation and the involvement of interest groups in policy formation known as corporatism – or as democratic, societal, liberal or neo-corporatism – in a broader political context: is corporatism systematically linked with other democratic institutions and processes? Secondly, we shall try to fill a gap in the theory of consensus democracy. This theory holds that types of party, electoral, executive and legislative systems occur in distinct clusters, but it fails to link interest group systems to these clusters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Politics, Institutions, and Welfare Spending in Industrialized Democracies, 1960–82
Hicks, A. M., & Swank, D. H. (1992) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1964129 · Cited by 734
The determinants of MNE subsidiaries' political strategies: evidence of institutional duality
Hillman, A. J., & Wan, W. P. (2005) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400137 · Cited by 452
Comparative housing and welfare: Theorising the relationship
Kemeny, J. (2001) · Journal of Housing and the Built Environment · doi:10.1023/a:1011526416064 · Cited by 278
Smart governance in institutional context: an in-depth analysis of Glasgow, Utrecht, and Curitiba
Tomor, Z., Przeybilovicz, E., & Leleux, C. (2021) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2021.103195 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Lijphart, A., & Crepaz, M. M. L.
- Venue
- British Journal of Political Science
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1991-04
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 235-246
- ISSN
- 0007-1234 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-2112
- OpenAlex
- W2157454557
- Cited by
- 496
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 110.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corporatism and Consensus Democracy in Eighteen Countries: Conceptual and Empirical Linkages. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0007123400006128
- The paper
- Lijphart, A., & Crepaz, M. M. L. (1991). Corporatism and Consensus Democracy in Eighteen Countries: Conceptual and Empirical Linkages. British Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123400006128
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
