The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Political Values in Russia, Ukraine and Lithuania: Sources and Implications for Democracy
Open accessAbstract
Employing data from three surveys of mass opinion conducted in Lithuania, Ukraine and European Russia during 1990, 1991 and 1992, we examine three prominent but competing hypotheses about the source of political values in the post-Soviet societies: historically derived political culture, regime indoctrination and the effects of societal modernization. The literature on Soviet political culture argues that Russian mass values are distinguished by authoritarianism and love of order, values which will be largely shared by Ukrainians, especially East Ukrainians, whereas Lithuanian society would not evince this pattern. Our data do not support this hypothesis. We then examine acceptance of Soviet era norms, both political and economic. We do not find support for the argument that regime indoctrination during the Soviet period produced a set of ideologically derived values throughout the former Soviet Union and across a series of generations. The third hypothesis – that industrialization, urbanization, war and changing educational opportunities shaped the formative experiences of succeeding generations in the Soviet societies and, therefore, their citizens' values – receives the most support: in each of the three societies, differences in political values across age groups, places of residence and levels of education are noteworthy. The variations in political values we find across demographic groupings help us to understand the level of pro-democratic values in each society. We find that in Russia and Ukraine more support for democracy can be found among urban, better educated respondents than among other groups. In Lithuania, the urban and better educated respondents evince pro-democratic values at about the same level as their counterparts in Russia and Ukraine, but Lithuanian farmers and blue-collar workers support democracy at a level closer to urban, white-collar Lithuanians than to their Russian and Ukrainian counterparts. In all three societies, those citizens most likely to hold values supportive of democracy are those who are less favourable to Soviet-era values and less convinced of the primacy of the need for social and political ‘order’. Those who desire strong leadership, however, tend to have more democratic values, not more authoritarian ones.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Culturalist Theory of Political Change
Eckstein, H. (1988) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1962491 · Cited by 392
Cited by
(2005) · Cited by 3,670
Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence
Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790881 · Cited by 2,596
The Politics and Economics of Democratic Commitment: Support for Democracy in Transition Societies
Evans, G., & Whitefield, S. (1995) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123400007328 · Cited by 403
Democracy Derailed in Russia: The Failure of Open Politics
Legvold, R., & Fish, M. S. (2006) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20031880 · Cited by 270
What do we know about civil society and regime change thirty years after 1989?
Bernhard, M. (2020) · East European Politics · doi:10.1080/21599165.2020.1787160 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Reisinger, W. M., Miller, A. H., Hesli, V. L., & Maher, K. H.
- Venue
- British Journal of Political Science
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1994-04
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 183-223
- ISSN
- 0007-1234 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-2112
- OpenAlex
- W2018505883
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 41.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Political Values in Russia, Ukraine and Lithuania: Sources and Implications for Democracy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0007123400009789
- The paper
- Reisinger, W. M., Miller, A. H., Hesli, V. L., & Maher, K. H. (1994). Political Values in Russia, Ukraine and Lithuania: Sources and Implications for Democracy. British Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123400009789
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.