CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 235Legal and cultural studies analysisCultural History and Identity FormationHistorical Legal Studies and Society

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Production of Legal Identities Proper to States: The Case of the Permanent Family Surname

Scott, James C., Tehranian, John, Mathias, Jeremy·2002·Comparative Studies in Society and History
DOI 10.1017/s0010417502000026
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

State naming practices and local, customary naming practices are strikingly different. Each set of practices is designed to make the human and physical landscape legible, by sharply identifying a unique individual, a household, or a singular geographic feature. Yet they are each devised by very distinct agents for whom the purposes of identification are radically different. Purely local, customary practices, as we shall see, achieve a level of precision and clarity--often with impressive economy--perfectly suited to the needs of knowledgeable locals. State naming practices are, by contrast, constructed to guide an official ÔstrangerÕ in identifying unambiguously persons and places, not just in a single locality, but in many localities using standardized administrative techniques.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0010417502000026

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Scott, J. C., Tehranian, J., & Mathias, J.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Comparative Studies in Society and History
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2002-01
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
4-44
ISSN
  • 0010-4175 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2999
DOI
10.1017/s0010417502000026
OpenAlex
W2166207874
Cited by
235
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
FWCI
14.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 246 d)
Locations
Comparative Studies in Society and History (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Legal and cultural studies analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Cultural History and Identity Formation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Historical Legal Studies and Society
Keywords
legal identity, personal names, state formation, administrative standardization, household identification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review