The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A randomized controlled trial of early dietary supply of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids and mental development in term infants
Abstract
The effects of dietary docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) supply during infancy on later cognitive development of healthy term infants were evaluated in a randomized clinical trial of infant formula milk supplemented with 0.35% DHA or with 0.36% DHA and 0.72% arachidonic acid (AA), or control formula which provided no DHA or AA. Fifty-six 18-month-old children (26 male, 30 female) who were enrolled in the trial within the first 5 days of life and fed the assigned diet to 17 weeks of age were tested using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 2nd edition (BSID-II) (Bayley 1993) at the Retina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, TX. These children had also been assessed at 4 months and 12 months of age for blood fatty-acid composition, sweep visual evoked potential (VEP) acuity, and forced-choice preferential looking (FPL) acuity (Birch et al. 1998). Supplementation of infant formula with DHA+AA was associated with a mean increase of 7 points on the Mental Development Index (MDI) of the BSID-II. Both the cognitive and motor subscales of the MDI showed a significant developmental age advantage for DHA- and DHA+AA-supplemented groups over the control group. While a similar trend was found for the language subscale, it did not reach statistical significance. Neither the Psychomotor Development Index nor the Behavior Rating Scale of the BSID-II showed significant differences among diet groups, consistent with a specific advantage of DHA supplementation on mental development. Significant correlations between plasma and RBC-DHA at 4 months of age but not at 12 months of age and MDI at 18 months of age suggest that early dietary supply of DHA was a major dietary determinant of improved performance on the MDI.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sources of human psychological differences: the Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart
Bouchard, T. J., Lykken, D. T., McGue, M., Segal, N. L., & Tellegen, A. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2218526 · Cited by 1,373
Cited by
Mechanisms of action of docosahexaenoic acid in the nervous system
Salem, N., Litman, B., Kim, H., & Gawrisch, K. (2001) · Lipids · doi:10.1007/s11745-001-0805-6 · Cited by 919
Mukherjee, P. K., Marcheselli, V. L., Serhan, C. N., & Bazan, N. G. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0402531101 · Cited by 753
Essential fatty acids as functional components of foods- a review
Kaur, N., Chugh, V., & Gupta, A. K. (2014) · Journal of Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13197-012-0677-0 · Cited by 490
Essential Fatty Acids and the Brain
Haag, M. (2003) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/070674370304800308 · Cited by 421
The health effects of dietary unsaturated fatty acids
Lunn, J., & Theobald, H. E. (2006) · Nutrition Bulletin · doi:10.1111/j.1467-3010.2006.00571.x · Cited by 401
Metadata
- Authors
- Birch, E. E., Garfield, S., Hoffman, D. R., Uauy, R., & Birch, D. G.
- Venue
- Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 174-181
- ISSN
- 0012-1622 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2088837519
- Cited by
- 619
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 33.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A randomized controlled trial of early dietary supply of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids and mental development in term infants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0012162200000311
- The paper
- Birch, E. E., Garfield, S., Hoffman, D. R., Uauy, R., & Birch, D. G. (2000). A randomized controlled trial of early dietary supply of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids and mental development in term infants. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0012162200000311
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.