The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A test for the role of natural selection in the stabilization of transposable element copy number in a population of Drosophila melanogaster
Open accessAbstract
Summary: The numbers of members of three families of copia-like elements were counted on twenty X, 2nd and 3rd chromosomes collected from a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster. Theoretical predictions were computed for two models of copy number stabilization: (1) element frequencies are regulated by a simple genetic process such as copy number dependent transposition or excision, independent of chromosomal location; (2) elements are eliminated by natural selection against mutational effects of their insertion into the chromosome. Since insertions into the X can be expected to suffer more selection than autosomal insertions, due to expression of mutant phenotypes in the hemizygous state, hypothesis 2, called the disproportional model, predicts that the proportion of elements on the X will be smaller than the proportion of the genome contributed by the X, while hypothesis 1, called the equiproportional model, predicts that this proportionality will be unaffected. Two of the elements,297 and roo, showed no evidence for deficiency of X-linked elements, but the data for a third element,412, were consistent with the prediction based on the selective model. These results indicate that simple selection against mutational effects of insertions of transposable elements is not generally adequate to account for their distribution within populations. We argue that a mechanism such as recombination between elements at different chromosomal sites, leading to rearrangements with highly deleterious, dominant effects could play a role in stabilizing copy number. This process would lead to a higher abundance of elements in genomic regions with restricted crossing over. We present some data indicating such an effect, and discuss possible interpretations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Natural and Artificial Selection, Part V: Selection and Mutation
Haldane, J. B. S. (1927) · Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1017/s0305004100015644 · Cited by 1,326
Cited by
A Fine-Scale Map of Recombination Rates and Hotspots Across the Human Genome
Myers, S., Bottolo, L., Freeman, C., McVean, G., & Donnelly, P. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1117196 · Cited by 1,134
The transposable elements of the Drosophila melanogaster euchromatin: a genomics perspective
Kaminker, J. S., Bergman, C. M., Kronmiller, B., Carlson, J., Svirskas, R., Patel, S., Frise, E., Wheeler, D. A., Lewis, S. E., Rubin, G. M., et al. (2002) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2002-3-12-research0084 · Cited by 601
On the role of unequal exchange in the containment of transposable element copy number
Langley, C. H., Montgomery, E., Hudson, R., Kaplan, N., & Charlesworth, B. (1988) · Genetical Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672300027695 · Cited by 342
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Montgomery, E., Charlesworth, B., & Langley, C. H.
- Venue
- Genetical Research
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 1987-02
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-41
- ISSN
- 0016-6723 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5073
- OpenAlex
- W1988090113
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A test for the role of natural selection in the stabilization of transposable element copy number in a population of Drosophila melanogaster. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0016672300026707
- The paper
- Montgomery, E., Charlesworth, B., & Langley, C. H. (1987). A test for the role of natural selection in the stabilization of transposable element copy number in a population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetical Research. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0016672300026707
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.