The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular Diversity, Structure and Domestication of Grasses
Open accessAbstract
Over the last 10,000 years, crop domestication has been the single most important human cultural development. Grasses are prominent among these crops, and provide the vast majority of the world's food. Similar traits have been selected during the domestication and breeding of these critically important grasses, and since they share a similar complement of genes, the same set of genes may have been selected. Even though the process of domestication occurred over the same 5000 to 10,000 year period, the domesticated grasses have major differences in genome structure, diversity, and life history. Molecular investigations of grass domestication have succeeded in identifying progenitor species and are beginning to catalog genetic resources. Additionally, research is now elucidating some of the basic processes by which crops have evolved over the last few millennia. In this review, we discuss our present knowledge of molecular diversity among the grass crops and relate that diversity to the genes involved in domestication and to yield gains. Understanding the connection between diversity and genome structure will be critical to future crop breeding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The limits of selection during maize domestication
Wang, R.-L., Stec, A., Hey, J., Lukens, L., & Doebley, J. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/18435 · Cited by 740
Cited by
The role of barren stalk1 in the architecture of maize
Gallavotti, A., Zhao, Q., Kyozuka, J., Meeley, R. B., Ritter, M. K., Doebley, J. F., Enrico Pè, M., & Schmidt, R. J. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03148 · Cited by 365
Yang, H., Wu, J.-J., Tang, T., Liu, K.-D., & Dai, C. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-07871-9 · Cited by 199
Variability and adaptability of Miscanthus species evaluated for energy crop domestication
YAN, J., CHEN, W., LUO, F., MA, H., MENG, A., LI, X., ZHU, M., LI, S., ZHOU, H., ZHU, W., et al. (2012) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01108.x · Cited by 119
Demographically-based evaluation of genomic regions under selection in domestic dogs
Freedman, A. H., Schweizer, R. M., Ortega-Del Vecchyo, D., Han, E., Davis, B. W., Gronau, I., Silva, P. M., Galaverni, M., Fan, Z., Marx, P., et al. (2016) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005851 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- BUCKLER, E. S., THORNSBERRY, J. M., & KRESOVICH, S.
- Venue
- Genetics Research
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 213-8
- ISSN
- 0016-6723 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5073
- OpenAlex
- W2161408390
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.