Carbon isotope stratigraphy and the problem of a pre-Tommotian Stage in Siberia
Abstract
Carbon isotopic oscillations are useful to elucidate the stratigraphy and biogeochemical events around the Precambrian–Cambrian transition. New isotopic data from the Manykaj and Emyaksin formations of the eastern Anabar Uplift (Siberia) help to correlate the Lower Cambrian and Neoproterozoic–Cambrian transitional beds across the Siberian Platform. The similarity of trends and amplitudes of the carbon isotopic curves, together with biostratigraphic and sequence-stratigraphic markers from the Anabar Uplift, provide a precise correlation with the southern part of the Siberian Platform. Diagenesis of argillaceous limestones of the Emyaksin Formation has apparently not affected the primary isotopic variations. The resulting curve is nearly identical in sections about 100 km apart in the Tommotian–Atdabanian portion of the formation. Relatively frequent and pronounced isotopic oscillations in the lower beds of the Emyaksin Formation fit between features I and II of the southern Siberian isotopic reference scale but are undetected therein owing to the depositional hiatus at the base of the Tommotian Stage in its type section. This confirms the transgressive onlap from the north suggested by previous studies, and makes the appearance of the Cambrian skeletal fossils on the Siberian Platform less abrupt. The hiatus in the south appears to embrace at least two biostratigraphic zones as recognized in the north. The case is strengthened for a pre-Tommotian Cambrian Stage in Siberia, the biostratigraphic framework for which has been elaborated earlier.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
KAUFMAN, A., & KNOLL, A. (1995) · Precambrian Research · doi:10.1016/0301-9268(94)00070-8 · Cited by 1,167 · see citing works
Narbonne, G. M., Myrow, P. M., Landing, E., & Anderson, M. M. (1987) · Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences · doi:10.1139/e87-124 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
The Lower Cambrian Fossil Record of the Soviet Union
Rozanov, A. Y., & Zhuravlev, A. Y. (1992) · Topics in Geobiology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2427-8_7 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The earliest Cambrian record of animals and ocean geochemical change
Maloof, A. C., Porter, S. M., Moore, J. L., Dudas, F. O., Bowring, S. A., Higgins, J. A., Fike, D. A., & Eddy, M. P. (2010) · Geological Society of America Bulletin · doi:10.1130/b30346.1 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
Chronology of early Cambrian biomineralization
KOUCHINSKY, A., BENGTSON, S., RUNNEGAR, B., SKOVSTED, C., STEINER, M., & VENDRASCO, M. (2012) · Geological Magazine · doi:10.1017/s0016756811000720 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Self-citationFurther SHRIMP geochronology on the early Cambrian of South China
Compston, W., Zhang, Z., Cooper, J. A., Ma, G., & Jenkins, R. J. F. (2008) · American Journal of Science · doi:10.2475/04.2008.01 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Xiao, S., Hu, J., Yuan, X., Parsley, R. L., & Cao, R. (2005) · Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology · doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2002.02.001 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Smith, E. F., Macdonald, F. A., Petach, T. A., Bold, U., & Schrag, D. P. (2016) · Geological Society of America Bulletin · doi:10.1130/b31248.1 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
KOUCHINSKY, A., BENGTSON, S., PAVLOV, V., RUNNEGAR, B., TORSSANDER, P., YOUNG, E., & ZIEGLER, K. (2007) · Geological Magazine · doi:10.1017/s0016756807003354 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Self-citationLI, D., LING, H.-F., JIANG, S.-Y., PAN, J.-Y., CHEN, Y.-Q., CAI, Y.-F., & FENG, H.-Z. (2009) · Geological Magazine · doi:10.1017/s0016756809006268 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
The Cambrian Fossil Record and the Origin of the Phyla
Budd, G. E. (2003) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/43.1.157 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
- Authors
- KOUCHINSKY, A., BENGTSON, S., MISSARZHEVSKY, V. V., PELECHATY, S., TORSSANDER, P., & VAL'KOV, A. K.
- Affiliations
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Swedish Museum of Natural History (SE)
- Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
- Petroleum Development Oman (Oman) (OM)
- Stockholm University (SE)
- Venue
- Geological Magazine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2001-07
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 387-396
- ISSN
- 0016-7568 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5081
- OpenAlex
- W2103309015
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Geological Magazine (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological Studies and Exploration
- Keywords
- carbon isotope stratigraphy, Precambrian-Cambrian transition, Emyaksin Formation, Anabar Uplift, Siberian Platform, depositional hiatus, biozonation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review