Cited by 43Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsGeological and Geochemical AnalysisGeological Studies and Exploration

Carbon isotope stratigraphy and the problem of a pre-Tommotian Stage in Siberia

KOUCHINSKY, ARTEM, BENGTSON, STEFAN, MISSARZHEVSKY, VLADIMIR V., PELECHATY, SHANE, TORSSANDER, PETER, VAL'KOV, ANATOLIJ K.·2001·Geological Magazine

Abstract

Carbon isotopic oscillations are useful to elucidate the stratigraphy and biogeochemical events around the Precambrian–Cambrian transition. New isotopic data from the Manykaj and Emyaksin formations of the eastern Anabar Uplift (Siberia) help to correlate the Lower Cambrian and Neoproterozoic–Cambrian transitional beds across the Siberian Platform. The similarity of trends and amplitudes of the carbon isotopic curves, together with biostratigraphic and sequence-stratigraphic markers from the Anabar Uplift, provide a precise correlation with the southern part of the Siberian Platform. Diagenesis of argillaceous limestones of the Emyaksin Formation has apparently not affected the primary isotopic variations. The resulting curve is nearly identical in sections about 100 km apart in the Tommotian–Atdabanian portion of the formation. Relatively frequent and pronounced isotopic oscillations in the lower beds of the Emyaksin Formation fit between features I and II of the southern Siberian isotopic reference scale but are undetected therein owing to the depositional hiatus at the base of the Tommotian Stage in its type section. This confirms the transgressive onlap from the north suggested by previous studies, and makes the appearance of the Cambrian skeletal fossils on the Siberian Platform less abrupt. The hiatus in the south appears to embrace at least two biostratigraphic zones as recognized in the north. The case is strengthened for a pre-Tommotian Cambrian Stage in Siberia, the biostratigraphic framework for which has been elaborated earlier.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0016756801005684

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KOUCHINSKY, A., BENGTSON, S., MISSARZHEVSKY, V. V., PELECHATY, S., TORSSANDER, P., & VAL'KOV, A. K.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Swedish Museum of Natural History (SE)
  • Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
  • Petroleum Development Oman (Oman) (OM)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
Venue
Geological Magazine
Published
2001-07
Volume
138
Issue
4
Pages
387-396
ISSN
  • 0016-7568 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5081
OpenAlex
W2103309015
Cited by
43
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geological Magazine (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological Studies and Exploration
Keywords
carbon isotope stratigraphy, Precambrian-Cambrian transition, Emyaksin Formation, Anabar Uplift, Siberian Platform, depositional hiatus, biozonation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review