Cited by 4Biblical Studies and InterpretationClassical Antiquity StudiesClassical Studies and Philology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Augustan Rome and the Body of Christ: A Comparison of the Social Vision of the Res Gestae and Paul's Letter to the Romans

Harrison, James R.·2013·Harvard Theological Review

Abstract

A surprising omission in New Testament studies of the imperial world is a comparison of Augustus's conception of rule in the Res Gestae(RG) with Paul's eschatological gospel of grace in his letter to the Romans. Even though each document has been foundational in the history of Western civilization, a comparison of their vastly different social outcomes has not been undertaken. Neil Elliott has made an outstanding contribution in laying the foundations for such a study, offering a scintillating analysis of Paul's letter to the Romans in terms of iustitia(justice),clementia(mercy),pietas(piety), and virtus(valor), the four virtues of Augustus inscribed on the Golden Shield erected in the Julian senate house (RG 34.2). However, a full-scale investigation of the Augustan conception of rule in the RG would open up new perspectives on Paul's engagement with the imperial world in Romans, given that Augustus became the iconic exemplum of virtue for his Julio-Claudian successors. Nonetheless, the difference in genre and aims of each document makes such a comparison daunting for New Testament scholars, as does the controversy that each document continues to generate in its own discipline. Further, we are unsure about the extent of the exposure that Paul might have had to the RG, directly or indirectly. Possibly Paul saw a Greek version of the RG text at Pisidian Antioch, along with the Latin text that still survives there, during his first missionary journey (Acts 13:14–50), even though there are no archaeological remains of the Greek text at Antioch today. Presumably Paul would have been aware that the original Latin copy of the RG was inscribed in bronze at Augustus's mausoleum at Rome. This article will argue that Paul, in planning to move his missionary outreach from the Greek East to the Latin West (Rom 15:19a–24), thought strategically about how he was going to communicate the reign of the crucified, risen, and ascended Son of God to inhabitants of the capital who had lived through the “Golden Age” of grace under Augustus and who were experiencing its renewal under Nero. What social and theological vision did Paul want to communicate to the city of Rome in which Augustus was the yardstick of virtue to which future leaders of Rome should aspire?

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0017816012000296

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 82 · Cited by 4

Research works printed but not linked: 76

  1. Harrison, 2013, Christian Origins and Greco-Roman Culture: Social and Literary Contexts for the New Testament, 213, 10.1163/9789004236219_011 · DOI
  2. Erasmo, 2008, Reading Death in Ancient Rome, 168
  3. Harrison, 2009, The Letter to the Romans, 329
  4. Peter, 1967, Historicorum Romanorum Reliquiae, 54
  5. 10.1017/CBO9780511518553 · DOI
  6. Fitzmyer, 1993, Romans, 653, 10.5040/9780300271959 · DOI
  7. Warmington, 1953, Remains of Old Latin: Archaic Inscriptions, 9
  8. 10.1017/S0009838800031050 · DOI
  9. Zanker, 1999, The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus
  10. Galinsky, 1996, Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction
  11. Jones, 1970, Augustus, 168
  12. Champlin, 2003, Nero, 139
  13. Gradel, 2002, Emperor Worship and Roman Religion, 10.1093/oso/9780198152750.001.0001 · DOI
  14. Harrison, 2011, ‘More Than Conquerors’” (Rom 8:37): Paul's Gospel and the Augustan Triumphal Arches of the Greek East and Latin West, Buried History, 47, 3, 10.62614/rdvp0424 · DOI
  15. King, 1907, The Sculptures and Inscription of Darius the Great on the Rock of Behistûn in Persia
  16. Bailey, 1986, Nobiles and Novi Reconsidered, AJP, 107, 255
  17. Lobur, 2008, Consensus, Concordia, and the Formation of Roman Imperial Ideology, 10.4324/9780203894231 · DOI
  18. Harrison, 2012, New Documents Illustrating Early Christianity, 64
  19. 10.1525/california/9780520220676.001.0001 · DOI
  20. Harrison, 2011, Paul and the Imperial Authorities at Thessalonica and Rome: A Study in the Collision of Ideology, 24, 10.1628/978-3-16-151562-0 · DOI
  21. Harrison, All Things to All Cultures: Paul Among Jews, Greeks and Romans, 1
  22. Elliott, 2008, The Arrogance of Nations: Reading Romans in the Shadow of Empire, 59
  23. Newman, 1992, Paul's Glory-Christology: Tradition and Rhetoric
  24. Eck, 2007, The Age of Augustus, 146
  25. Wiseman, 1971, New Men in the Roman Senate 139 B.C.–A.D. 14
  26. Gruen, 2011, Rethinking the Other in Antiquity, 115
  27. Lopez, 2008, Apostle to the Conquered: Reimagining Paul's Mission, 86
  28. Marcelli, 2000, The Afterlife of Inscriptions: Reusing, Rediscovering, Reinventing and Revitalizing Ancient Inscriptions, 7
  29. Brunt, 1967, Res Gestae Divi Augusti: The Achievements of the Divine Augustus
  30. Damon, 1995, Res Gestae Divi Augusti
  31. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199218035.003.0005 · DOI
  32. 10.4324/9780203262740 · DOI
  33. Volkmann, 1969, Res Gestae Divi AVGVSTI: Das Monumentum Ancyranum
  34. 10.4324/9780203262788 · DOI
  35. Marchal, 2008, The Politics of Heaven: Women, Gender, and Empire in the Study of Paul, 59
  36. Ridley, 2003, The Emperor's Retrospect: Augustus’ Res Gestae in Epigraphy, Historiography and Commentary
  37. Danker, 1982, Benefactor: Epigraphic Study of a Graeco-Roman and New Testament Semantic Field, 256
  38. Shotter, 2005, Augustus Caesar, 103, 10.4324/9780203022887 · DOI
  39. Yavetz, 1984, Caesar Augustus: Seven Aspects, 1
  40. Lacey, 1996, Augustus and the Principate: The Evolution of the System, 212
  41. Levick, 1999, Tiberius the Politician, 82
  42. Mommsen, Der Rechenschaftsbericht des Augustus, Historische Zeitschrift
  43. Siefrid, 2007, Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament, 607
  44. Ramage, 1987, The Nature and Purpose of Augustus’ “Res Gestae”
  45. Judge, 2008, The First Christians in the Roman World: Augustan and New Testament Essays, 182
  46. Jewett, 2000, Paul and Politics: Ekklesia−Israel−Imperium−Interpretation: Essays in Honor of Krister Stendahl, 58
  47. Newton, 1998, Deity and Diet: The Dilemma of Sacrificial Food in Corinth
  48. Winter, 2001, After Paul Left Corinth: The Influence of Secular Ethics and Social Change
  49. Dolley, 1975, The Memoirs of Augustus: The Fragments in Translation, Ancient Society: Resources for Teachers, 3, 163
  50. Erim, 1986, Aphrodisias: City of Venus Aphrodite
  51. Smith, JRS, 77, 1987
  52. 10.1515/9783110217247.4.313 · DOI
  53. Schreiner, 2001, Paul, Apostle of God's Glory in Christ: A Pauline Theology
  54. Harrison, 2002, New Documents Illustrating Early Christianity, 20
  55. Kienast, 1982, Augustus: Prinzeps und Monarch
  56. Bassler, 1982, Divine Impartiality: Paul and a Theological Axiom
  57. Punt, 2008, As It is Written: Studying Paul's Use of Scripture, 261
  58. Harrison, 2006, Paul and His Theology, 77
  59. Jewett, 2007, Romans: A Commentary, 295
  60. Harris, 1992, Jesus as God: The New Testament Use of Theos in Reference to Jesus, 143
  61. 10.1017/CHOL9780521264303.006 · DOI
  62. Moo, 1996, The Epistle to the Romans, 777
  63. Schreiner, 1998, Romans, 664
  64. Esler, 2003, Conflict and Identity in Romans: The Social Setting of Paul's Letter, 316
  65. Everitt, 2006, Augustus: The Life of Rome's First Emperor, 200
  66. Agosto, 2004, Paul and the Roman Imperial Order, 103
  67. Mommsen, 1883, Res Gestae divi Augustae ex monumentis Ancyrano et Apolloniensi
  68. Harrison, 1999, Paul, Eschatology, and the Augustan Age of Grace, TynBul, 50, 79
  69. 10.1017/CBO9780511583612 · DOI
  70. Toney, 2008, Paul's Inclusive Ethic: Resolving Community Conflicts and Promoting Mission in Romans 14–15, 54, 10.1628/978-3-16-151595-8 · DOI
  71. Wiefel, 1991, The Romans Debate, 85
  72. Kahl, 2010, Galatians Re-Imagined: Reading with the Eyes of the Vanquished, 192, 10.2307/j.ctv19cwb7n · DOI
  73. Earl, 1968, The Age of Augustus, 85
  74. Gagé, 1935, Res Gestae divi Augustae ex Monumentis Ancyrano et Antiocheno. Latinis Ancyrano et Apolloniensi Graecis
  75. Morris, 1970, Apostolic History and the Gospel: Biblical and Historical Essays Presented to F. F. Bruce on His 60th Birthday, 249
  76. Winter, 2002, Rome in the Bible and the Early Church, 67

Metadata

Authors
Harrison, J. R.
Affiliations
Sydney College of Divinity (AU)
Corresponding author
Harrison, James R.
Venue
Harvard Theological Review
Published
2013-01
Volume
106
Issue
1
Pages
1-36
ISSN
  • 0017-8160 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-4517
OpenAlex
W2315031832
Cited by
4
References
82
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
7.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Harvard Theological Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
Keywords
Augustus, Res Gestae, Paul's letter to the Romans, imperial virtues, iustitia, clementia, pietas, virtus, eschatology, Nero

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Augustan Rome and the Body of Christ: A Comparison of the Social Vision of the Res Gestae and Paul's Letter to the Romans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0017816012000296
The paper
Harrison, J. R. (2013). Augustan Rome and the Body of Christ: A Comparison of the Social Vision of the Res Gestae and Paul's Letter to the Romans. Harvard Theological Review. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0017816012000296