Cited by 4Colonial History and Postcolonial StudiesCultural Studies and ColonialismAfrican history and culture studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

MAKING YEMEN INDIAN: REWRITING THE BOUNDARIES OF IMPERIAL ARABIA

Open access
Willis, John M.·2009·International Journal of Middle East Studies

Abstract

This article argues that the Aden Protectorate constituted one of the westernmost parts of India in terms of its political–legal identity and its place in the cultural project of imperial India. Although the port of Aden was governed as part of the Bombay Presidency until 1937, the tribes of the Aden Protectorate were treated as independent native states similar to the princely states of India. Using the sultanate of Lahj as a case study, the article shows the extent to which the colonial state used the Indian model to elaborate a history of the sultanate as an independent political entity, a status that was then institutionalized in historical texts, ethnographic knowledge, and state rituals. The article concludes with an analysis of the protectorate's participation in the 1903 Coronation Durbar in Delhi as a means of demonstrating its place in the British imagination of a socially and politically fragmented India that extended beyond geographical South Asia.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0020743808090466

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Willis, J. M.
Corresponding author
Willis, John M.
Venue
International Journal of Middle East Studies
Published
2009-02
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
38a-38a
ISSN
  • 0020-7438 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-6380
OpenAlex
W4242374990
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal Middle East Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Cultural Studies and Colonialism
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › African history and culture studies
Keywords
Aden Protectorate, British colonial rule, princely states, colonial historiography, ethnography, state rituals, Bombay Presidency, tribal states, colonial India, imperial identity, Arabian Peninsula

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MAKING YEMEN INDIAN: REWRITING THE BOUNDARIES OF IMPERIAL ARABIA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0020743808090466
The paper
Willis, J. M. (2009). MAKING YEMEN INDIAN: REWRITING THE BOUNDARIES OF IMPERIAL ARABIA. International Journal of Middle East Studies. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020743808090466