CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 47Economic Sanctions and International RelationsInternational Relations and Foreign PolicyGlobal Peace and Security Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

International Sanctions: A Framework for Analysis with Special Reference to the UN and Southern Africa

Doxey, Margaret·1972·International Organization
DOI 10.1017/s002081830000299x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper falls into two main parts. In Part I an attempt is made to develop a simple framework which can be used for analyzing the role of sanctions, with special reference to international sanctions.1In Part II this framework is used to investigate the status of the United Nations as a sanctioning body and, in particular, the relationship between the UN and Southern Africa where Rhodesia has been subjected to international economic sanctions since 1965 and South Africa has been under threat of similar measures since the early 1960s.2

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s002081830000299x

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Africa Digest, 10, 1971, (Vol. 18, No. 5), p. 13 et seq.
  2. See Commonwealth Prime Ministers' Meeting in London: Final Communique, Cmnd 3115 (London, 1966) pp. 3–4.
  3. Fawcett, 1970, Greece and the International Community, The World Today, 26, 225
  4. Gurr, 1967, The Conditions of Civil Violence: First Tests of a Casual Model, 28
  5. Parsons, 1947, The Theory of Economic and Social Organization, 328
  6. Iowa Law Review, 1963-1964, (Vol. 49) p. 234.)
  7. Segal, 1964, Sanctions
  8. Austin, 1968, The Character and Legislation of the Rhodesian Front since UDI
  9. Zacklin, 1969, Challenge of Rhodesia, International Conciliation, 575, 5
  10. Doxey, 1971, The Rhodesian Sanctions Experiment,, Year Book of World Affairs, 25, 142
  11. International Sanctions: a report by a group of members for the Royal Institute of International Affairs (London: Oxford University Press for RIIA, 1938)
  12. The World Today, 03, 1967 (Vol. 23, No. 3) p. 102.
  13. Economic Sanctions and International Enforcement (London: Oxford University Press for the Royal Institute of International Affairs, [Oxford paperback 268] 1971).
  14. Leiss, 1965, Apartheid and UN Collective Measures: an Analysis, 165

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Doxey, M.
Affiliations
Trent University (CA)
Corresponding author
Doxey, Margaret
Venue
International Organization
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
1972
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
527-550
ISSN
  • 0020-8183 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-5088
DOI
10.1017/s002081830000299x
OpenAlex
W2006924040
Cited by
43
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 13656 d)
Locations
  • International Organization (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Sanctions and International Relations
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Keywords
international sanctions, economic sanctions, United Nations, UN sanctions, Southern Africa, Rhodesia, South Africa, decolonization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review