Cited by 128Economic Sanctions and International RelationsInternational Business and FDIGlobal Financial Crisis and Policies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effect of Sanctions on U.S. Foreign Direct Investment

Biglaiser, Glen, Lektzian, David·2011·International Organization

Abstract

For years, the United States has imposed economic sanctions to compel countries to alter their behavior. An important concern is whether government sanctions influence private foreign direct investment (FDI) decisions, the largest source of foreign capital. In the first study to assess empirically the relationship between economic sanctions and FDI, we consider whether U.S. sanctions influence U.S. FDI inflows into targeted countries. Using panel data for 171 countries from 1965 to 2000, we find strong evidence that U.S investors pull out of countries targeted for U.S sanctions prior to their imposition. This disinvestment is not permanent and investment tends to return after the sanctions are imposed. The results provide support for FDI studies that show the effect of risk on investor decision making.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0020818311000117

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. 10.2307/2010323 · DOI
  2. Richardson, 1993, Sizing Up U.S. Export Disincentives
  3. 10.1111/j.1468-0343.2008.00330.x · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1079-1760.2003.00504007.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. Marshall, 2006, Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2004
  6. 10.1177/00223433030406002 · DOI
  7. 10.1017/S0022381608081048 · DOI
  8. Li, 2009, Democracy, Autocracy, and Expropriation of Foreign Direct Investment, Comparative Political Studies, 42, 1098, 10.1177/0010414009331723 · DOI
  9. Hufbauer, 2007, Economic Sanctions Reconsidered
  10. 10.1080/03050620490492150 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2007.00479.x · DOI
  12. Cameron, 2009, Microeconometrics Using Stata
  13. 2008, World Development Indicators 2008
  14. 10.2307/2111070 · DOI
  15. 10.4135/9781412985611 · DOI
  16. 10.1353/lar.2006.0001 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/03050620210394 · DOI
  18. 10.1561/100.00008068 · DOI
  19. 10.1017/S0020818303571077 · DOI
  20. 10.1093/pan/6.1.1 · DOI
  21. Ray, 1995, Democracy and International Conflict. An Evaluation of the Democratic Peace Proposition
  22. O'Donnell, 1978, Reflections on the Patterns of Change in the Bureaucratic-Authoritarian State, Latin American Research Review, 13, 3, 10.1017/S0023879100030661 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00370.x · DOI
  24. 10.1177/1065912909331428 · DOI
  25. 10.2307/2010357 · DOI
  26. Li, 2008, Foreign Direct Investment and Interstate Military Conflict, Journal of International Affairs, 62, 53
  27. 10.1080/03050620008434965 · DOI
  28. Vernon, 1998, In the Hurricane's Eye: The Troubled Prospects of Multinational Enterprises, 10.4159/9780674044661 · DOI
  29. 10.2202/1554-8597.1061 · DOI
  30. 10.1017/CBO9781139175050.003 · DOI
  31. Martin, 1992, Coercive Cooperation: Explaining Multilateral Economic Sanctions, 10.1515/9780691227825 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/0020-8833.00103 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00259.x · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1057/9781403915917_2 · DOI
  35. 10.1177/0022002707306811 · DOI
  36. Huntington, 1968, Political Order in Changing Societies
  37. Russett, 1993, Grasping the Democratic Peace. Principles for a Post–Cold War World
  38. 10.1177/0022002701045001003 · DOI
  39. 10.1017/CBO9780511549366 · DOI
  40. 2009, World Investment Report 2009: Transnational Corporations, Agricultural Production, and Development
  41. Klein, 2000, No Logo: Taking Aim at the Brand Bullies
  42. Jensen, 2006, Nation-States and the Multinational Corporation: A Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment
  43. 10.1177/106591299404700302 · DOI
  44. Gujarati, 2009, Basic Econometrics
  45. 10.1080/13876980802231123 · DOI
  46. 10.2307/2669353 · DOI
  47. Malesky, 2007, Twenty Years of Foreign Investment in Vietnam: Reviewing and Looking Forward, 147
  48. 10.1080/08853900490277341 · DOI
  49. 10.1093/jleo/16.2.334 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Biglaiser, G., & Lektzian, D.
Affiliations
Texas Tech University (US)
Venue
International Organization
Published
2011-07
Volume
65
Issue
3
Pages
531-551
ISSN
  • 0020-8183 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-5088
OpenAlex
W2107723060
Cited by
128
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Organization (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Sanctions and International Relations
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Global Financial Crisis and Policies
Keywords
economic sanctions, foreign direct investment, US sanctions, outward foreign direct investment, divestiture, investor risk aversion, international capital flows

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review