Rethinking the Conflict “Resource Curse”: How Oil Wealth Prevents Center-Seeking Civil Wars
Abstract
A broad literature on how oil wealth affects civil war onset argues that oil production engenders violent contests to capture a valuable prize from vulnerable governments. By contrast, research linking oil wealth to durable authoritarian regimes argues that oil-rich governments deter societal challenges by strategically allocating enormous revenues to enhance military capacity and to provide patronage. This article presents a unified formal model that evaluates how these competing mechanisms affect overall incentives for center-seeking civil wars. The model yields two key implications. First, large oil-generated revenues strengthen the government and exert an overall effect that decreases center-seeking civil war propensity. Second, oil revenues are less effective at preventing center-seeking civil war relative to other revenue sources, which distinguishes overall and relative effects. Revised statistical results test overall rather than relative effects by omitting the conventional but posttreatment covariate of income per capita, and demonstrate a consistent negative association between oil wealth and center-seeking civil war onset.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The original resource-curse argument overlooks that petroleum revenues may reduce conflict by helping governments bribe or suppress the opposition.
“Furthermore, the original argument fails to take the obvious endogeneity of oil extraction into account (Ross 2015), and also overlooks that petroleum revenues may actually reduce conflict by helping governments bribe or suppress the opposition (Paine 2016).”
From Dynamics and Logics of Civil War (2017) · cites this paper as Paine 2016
Cites
Armed Conflict 1946-2001: A New Dataset
GLEDITSCH, N. P., WALLENSTEEN, P., ERIKSSON, M., SOLLENBERG, M., & STRAND, H. (2002) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343302039005007 · Cited by 3,846 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Gleditsch et al. 2002.”
Do natural resources fuel authoritarianism? A reappraisal of the resource curse
HABER, S., & MENALDO, V. (2011) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055410000584 · Cited by 1,128 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Major academic contributions include Collier and Hoeffler 2004; Fearon and Laitin 2003; Fearon 2005; Humphreys 2005; Hegre and Sambanis 2006; Ross 2004a, 2004b, and 2012; and Lei and Michaels 2014.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dynamics and Logics of Civil War
Cederman, L.-E., & Vogt, M. (2017) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002717721385 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
No extraction without representation: The ethno-regional oil curse and secessionist conflict
Hunziker, P., & Cederman, L.-E. (2017) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343316687365 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
The politics of survival or business as usual? Exploring the effects of armed conflict on corruption
Lohaus, M., & Bussmann, M. (2021) · Journal of International Relations and Development · doi:10.1057/s41268-020-00186-9 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Paine, J.
- Corresponding author
- Paine, Jack
- ORCID
- Paine, Jack
- Venue
- International Organization
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 727-761
- ISSN
- 0020-8183 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-5088
- OpenAlex
- W2524132089
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 9.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Organization (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Natural Resources and Economic Development
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
- Keywords
- resource curse, oil wealth, civil war onset, authoritarian regimes, oil revenue, military capabilities, patronage, formal models, per capita income
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review