Cited by 62Natural Resources and Economic DevelopmentPolitical Conflict and GovernanceDefense, Military, and Policy Studies

Rethinking the Conflict “Resource Curse”: How Oil Wealth Prevents Center-Seeking Civil Wars

Paine, Jack·2016·International Organization

Abstract

A broad literature on how oil wealth affects civil war onset argues that oil production engenders violent contests to capture a valuable prize from vulnerable governments. By contrast, research linking oil wealth to durable authoritarian regimes argues that oil-rich governments deter societal challenges by strategically allocating enormous revenues to enhance military capacity and to provide patronage. This article presents a unified formal model that evaluates how these competing mechanisms affect overall incentives for center-seeking civil wars. The model yields two key implications. First, large oil-generated revenues strengthen the government and exert an overall effect that decreases center-seeking civil war propensity. Second, oil revenues are less effective at preventing center-seeking civil war relative to other revenue sources, which distinguishes overall and relative effects. Revised statistical results test overall rather than relative effects by omitting the conventional but posttreatment covariate of income per capita, and demonstrate a consistent negative association between oil wealth and center-seeking civil war onset.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0020818316000205

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The original resource-curse argument overlooks that petroleum revenues may reduce conflict by helping governments bribe or suppress the opposition.

    “Furthermore, the original argument fails to take the obvious endogeneity of oil extraction into account (Ross 2015), and also overlooks that petroleum revenues may actually reduce conflict by helping governments bribe or suppress the opposition (Paine 2016).”

    From Dynamics and Logics of Civil War (2017) · cites this paper as Paine 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paine, J.
Corresponding author
Paine, Jack
Venue
International Organization
Published
2016
Volume
70
Issue
4
Pages
727-761
ISSN
  • 0020-8183 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-5088
OpenAlex
W2524132089
Cited by
62
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
9.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Organization (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Natural Resources and Economic Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
Keywords
resource curse, oil wealth, civil war onset, authoritarian regimes, oil revenue, military capabilities, patronage, formal models, per capita income

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review