Droning On: Explaining the Proliferation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
Abstract
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), more popularly known as “drones,” have become emblematic of twenty-first century military technologies but scholars have yet to convincingly explain the drivers of UAV proliferation. Using the first systematic data set of UAV proliferation, this research note examines the spread of UAVs in the context of scholarly debates about interests versus capacity in explaining policy adoption. The results yield important insights for both IR scholarship and the policy-making community. While countries that experience security threats—including territorial disputes and terrorism—are more likely to seek UAVs, drone proliferation is not simply a function of the threat environment. We find evidence that democracies and autocracies are more likely than mixed regimes to develop armed UAV programs, and suggest that autocracies and democracies have their own unique incentives to acquire this technology. Moreover, supply-side factors play a role in the UAV proliferation process: a state's technological capacity is a strong predictor of whether it will obtain the most sophisticated UAVs. The theories and evidence we present challenge emerging views about UAV proliferation and shed useful light on how and why drones spread.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Security threats, especially threats from militant groups, drive many countries to acquire advanced and armed drones.
“They show that security threats, and especially threats from militant groups, drive many countries to acquire advanced and armed drones.”
From Do Emerging Military Technologies Matter for International Politics? (2020) · cites this paper as Fuhrmann & Horowitz 2017
Democracies seeking to reduce their own casualties and autocracies seeking to increase centralized control over the use of force appear more likely to pursue armed drones, and more technologically sophisticated countries are more likely to acquire advanced drones.
“Democracies, seeking to reduce their own casualties, and autocracies, seeking to increase centralized control over the use of force, appear more likely to pursue armed drones, and more technologically sophisticated countries are more likely to acquire advanced drones (Fuhrmann & Horowitz 2017).”
From Do Emerging Military Technologies Matter for International Politics? (2020) · cites this paper as Fuhrmann & Horowitz 2017
Cites
The Diffusion of Military Power: Causes and Consequences for International Politics
Horowitz, M. C. (2010) · doi:10.1515/9781400835102 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Self-citationSeparating Fact from Fiction in the Debate over Drone Proliferation
Horowitz, M. C., Kreps, S. E., & Fuhrmann, M. (2016) · International Security · doi:10.1162/isec_a_00257 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Separating Fact from Fiction in the Debate over Drone Proliferation
Horowitz, M. C., Kreps, S. E., & Fuhrmann, M. (2016) · International Security · doi:10.1162/isec_a_00257 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Self-citationDo Emerging Military Technologies Matter for International Politics?
Horowitz, M. C. (2020) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-032725 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citationBots on the ground: an impending UGV revolution in military affairs?
Rossiter, A. (2020) · Small Wars & Insurgencies · doi:10.1080/09592318.2020.1743484 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Milan, F. F., & Bassiri Tabrizi, A. (2020) · Small Wars & Insurgencies · doi:10.1080/09592318.2020.1743488 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fuhrmann, M., & Horowitz, M. C.
- Venue
- International Organization
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 397-418
- ISSN
- 0020-8183 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-5088
- OpenAlex
- W3121673397
- Cited by
- 151
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 18.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Organization (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Military Technology and Strategies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
- Keywords
- unmanned aerial vehicles, drone proliferation, security threats, terrorism, territorial disputes, political regimes, democracy, authoritarian regimes, mixed regime, technological capabilities, policy adoption, armed drones
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review