Cited by 151Military Technology and StrategiesInternational Relations and Foreign PolicyDefense, Military, and Policy Studies

Droning On: Explaining the Proliferation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

Fuhrmann, Matthew, Horowitz, Michael C.·2017·International Organization

Abstract

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), more popularly known as “drones,” have become emblematic of twenty-first century military technologies but scholars have yet to convincingly explain the drivers of UAV proliferation. Using the first systematic data set of UAV proliferation, this research note examines the spread of UAVs in the context of scholarly debates about interests versus capacity in explaining policy adoption. The results yield important insights for both IR scholarship and the policy-making community. While countries that experience security threats—including territorial disputes and terrorism—are more likely to seek UAVs, drone proliferation is not simply a function of the threat environment. We find evidence that democracies and autocracies are more likely than mixed regimes to develop armed UAV programs, and suggest that autocracies and democracies have their own unique incentives to acquire this technology. Moreover, supply-side factors play a role in the UAV proliferation process: a state's technological capacity is a strong predictor of whether it will obtain the most sophisticated UAVs. The theories and evidence we present challenge emerging views about UAV proliferation and shed useful light on how and why drones spread.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0020818317000121

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Security threats, especially threats from militant groups, drive many countries to acquire advanced and armed drones.

    “They show that security threats, and especially threats from militant groups, drive many countries to acquire advanced and armed drones.”

    From Do Emerging Military Technologies Matter for International Politics? (2020) · cites this paper as Fuhrmann & Horowitz 2017

  • Democracies seeking to reduce their own casualties and autocracies seeking to increase centralized control over the use of force appear more likely to pursue armed drones, and more technologically sophisticated countries are more likely to acquire advanced drones.

    “Democracies, seeking to reduce their own casualties, and autocracies, seeking to increase centralized control over the use of force, appear more likely to pursue armed drones, and more technologically sophisticated countries are more likely to acquire advanced drones (Fuhrmann & Horowitz 2017).”

    From Do Emerging Military Technologies Matter for International Politics? (2020) · cites this paper as Fuhrmann & Horowitz 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fuhrmann, M., & Horowitz, M. C.
Venue
International Organization
Published
2017
Volume
71
Issue
2
Pages
397-418
ISSN
  • 0020-8183 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-5088
OpenAlex
W3121673397
Cited by
151
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1
FWCI
18.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Organization (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Military Technology and Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
Keywords
unmanned aerial vehicles, drone proliferation, security threats, terrorism, territorial disputes, political regimes, democracy, authoritarian regimes, mixed regime, technological capabilities, policy adoption, armed drones

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review