The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Shilluk Trade and Politics from the mid–seventeenth century to 1861
Abstract
From the mid-seventeenth century until 1861, the Shilluk, notoriously successful raiders, dominated the White Nile. Their population was largely concentrated in the riverain strip which is Shilluk-land today, yet they had undisputed control of the river down to Eleis, and raided as far north as the confluence with the Blue Nile. This ascendancy was based upon the canoe: the characteristic Shilluk tactic was the surprise mass canoe-raid upon herds or villages within striking distance of the river bank. Before the advent of Turco-Egyptian sailing ships, Shilluk canoes were the only really navigable craft on the White Nile. Another important Shilluk asset was the manpower provided by their comparatively high numbers. Most raids were carried out independently of the Shilluk king. The raiding pattern was probably established before the development of the Shilluk ‘divine’ kingship. From 1820 the Shilluk became more closely involved with the Muslim Sudan. It seems that the beginning of the ivory boom led Kordofan djellabas to open regular trade with the Shilluk. And in ever-increasing numbers, Muslim refugees from Turkish officialdom migrated into Shilluk territory. Trade between Shilluk and Muslim was largely confined to the settlement of Kaka. Its most profitable sector, the ivory trade, was governed by a strict royal monopoly, the maintenance of which gives some proof of the Shilluk king's authority. Wealth thus gained may have led to a short-lived increase in royal power. The mass of the Shilluk were unable to develop any economic alternative to the traditional raids, which continued unabated. In a new raiding pattern, Shilluk of the Kaka region joined Muslim immigrants in raids on the Dinka. Once Kaka had become a slave-market, slave raiding was probably the essential aim of these joint expeditions. Tensions between Shilluk and immigrant traders precipitated a crisis in 1860–1.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Tugo is said to have been the first to create a permanent royal capital, at Fashoda, 15 and to create its shrines and famous rituals of installation (Ogot 1964, Mercer 1971, Wall 1976, Schnepel 1990: 114;Frost 1974).”
From The divine kingship of the Shilluk (2011) · cites this paper as Mercer 1971
In the citing paper
“The result was a very dense population-by the early 19th century estimated at around two hundred thousand-living in some hundred settlements arranged so densely along the Nile that foreigners often described the 200 miles of the heart of Shilluk territory as i sisted of one continuous village.Many remarked it appeared to be the most densely settled part of Africa outside of Egypt itself (Mercer 1”
From The divine kingship of the Shilluk (2011) · cites this paper as Mercer 1971
In the citing paper
“The Shilluk reth appears to have been just one player in this predatory economy, effectively one bandit chief among many, and not even necessarily the most important, since while he received the largest share of booty, his base was in the south, closer to the pastoral Dinka rather than the richer prey to the north (Mercer 1971:416).”
From The divine kingship of the Shilluk (2011) · cites this paper as Mercer 1971:416
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- Trémaux, 1862, Voyage en Ethiopie au Soudan Oriental et dans la Nigritie, 54
- Tappi, 1903, Bull. Soc. Khéd. de Géog, 121
- Kaufmann, 1861, Das Gebiet des Weissen Flusses und dessen Bewohner, 57
- Evans-Pritchard, 1948, The Divine Kingship of the Shilluk of the Nilotic Sudan
- Ogot, 1964, The Historian in Tropical Africa, 294
- Gleichen, 1905, Survey of the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan
- Pallme, 1844, Travels in Kordofan, 147
- Browne, 1799, Travels in Africa, Egypt and Syria, 560
- Beltrame, 1861, Di un Viaggio sul Fiume Bianco nell'Africa Centrals, 10
- G., 1873, The Heart of Africa: three years travels and adventures in the unexplored regions of Central Africa 1868–71, 85
- Burckhardt, 1822, Travels in Nubia, 277
- Rüppell, 1829, Reisen in Nubien, Kordofan und dem peträischen Arabien, 160
- Westermann, 1912, The Shilluk People, their Language and Folklore, 162
- Poncet, 1863, Nouvelles Annales des Voyages, 23
- d'Antonio, 1859, Nouvelles Annales des Voyages, 26
- Selim, 1842, Voyage aux sources du Nil Blanc, Mem. Soc. Géog. de Paris, XVIII, 13
- Hillelson, 1923, Tabaqat Wad Dayf Allah: studies in the lives of scholars and saints, Sudan Notes and Records, VI
- Lienhardt, 1954, African Worlds, 144
- J., 1869, Travels in Central Africa and Explorations of the White Nile Tributaries, 4
- Gray, 1961, A history of the Southern Sudan 1839–1889, 76
- Werne, 1849, Expedition to Discover the Sources of the White Nile, 287
- Brun-Rollet, 1855, Le Nil Blanc et le Soudan, 48
- Hill, 1959, Egypt in the Sudan 1820–81, 60
- Holt, 1963, Funj Origins: a critique and new evidence, J. Afr. Hist., IV
- Beltrame, 1881, Il Fiume Bianco e i Denka, 83
- Crawford, 1951, The Fung Kingdom of Sennar, 160
- Hofmayr, 1925, Die Schilluk: Geschichte, Religion und Leben eines Niloten-Stämmes
- Douin, 1936, Histoire du règne du Khédive Ismail
- Thibaut, 1857, Nouvelles Annales des Voyages, 13
- von Heuglin, 1869, Reise in das Gebiet des Weissen Nil und seiner westlichen Zuflüsse 1862–4, 74
- Crazzolara, 1951, The Lwoo, 37
- James, 1905, Travels to Discover the Source of the Nile, 479
- Linant de Bellefonds, 1832, Journal of a Voyage on the Bahr Abiad or White Nile, J.R.G.S., 11, 180
- von Russegger, 1843, Reisen in Europa, Asien und Afrika, 64
- Bayard, 1854, Life and Landscapes from Egypt to the Negro Kingdoms of the White Nile, 331
- Knoblecher, Biblioteca Palatina Vindobonensis Codex. 14152
- Baker, 1874, Ismailia: A Narrative of the Expedition to Central Africa for the Suppression of the Slave Trade, organised by Ismail, Khedive of Egypt, 178
- Westermann, Introd., xxxi
- Petherick, 1861, Egypt, the Sudan and Central Africa, 354
Cited by
The divine kingship of the Shilluk
Graeber, D. (2011) · HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory · doi:10.14318/2fhau.v1i1.7 · Cited by 39
Anuak Politics, Ecology, and the Origins of Shilluk Kingship
Wall, L. L. (1976) · Ethnology · doi:10.2307/3773326 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Mercer, P.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Mercer, Patricia
- Venue
- The Journal of African History
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1971-07
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 407-426
- ISSN
- 0021-8537 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5138
- OpenAlex
- W2166029455
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of African History (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › African history and culture studies
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › African Studies and Geopolitics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Global Maritime and Colonial Histories
- Keywords
- Shilluk, White Nile, ivory trade, royal monopoly, kaka, Muslim refugees, slave raiding, Dinka
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Shilluk Trade and Politics from the mid–seventeenth century to 1861. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0021853700010859
- The paper
- Mercer, P. (1971). Shilluk Trade and Politics from the mid–seventeenth century to 1861. The Journal of African History. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021853700010859