Cited by 37African history and culture studiesAfrican Studies and GeopoliticsGlobal Maritime and Colonial Histories

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Shilluk Trade and Politics from the mid–seventeenth century to 1861

Mercer, Patricia·1971·The Journal of African History

Abstract

From the mid-seventeenth century until 1861, the Shilluk, notoriously successful raiders, dominated the White Nile. Their population was largely concentrated in the riverain strip which is Shilluk-land today, yet they had undisputed control of the river down to Eleis, and raided as far north as the confluence with the Blue Nile. This ascendancy was based upon the canoe: the characteristic Shilluk tactic was the surprise mass canoe-raid upon herds or villages within striking distance of the river bank. Before the advent of Turco-Egyptian sailing ships, Shilluk canoes were the only really navigable craft on the White Nile. Another important Shilluk asset was the manpower provided by their comparatively high numbers. Most raids were carried out independently of the Shilluk king. The raiding pattern was probably established before the development of the Shilluk ‘divine’ kingship. From 1820 the Shilluk became more closely involved with the Muslim Sudan. It seems that the beginning of the ivory boom led Kordofan djellabas to open regular trade with the Shilluk. And in ever-increasing numbers, Muslim refugees from Turkish officialdom migrated into Shilluk territory. Trade between Shilluk and Muslim was largely confined to the settlement of Kaka. Its most profitable sector, the ivory trade, was governed by a strict royal monopoly, the maintenance of which gives some proof of the Shilluk king's authority. Wealth thus gained may have led to a short-lived increase in royal power. The mass of the Shilluk were unable to develop any economic alternative to the traditional raids, which continued unabated. In a new raiding pattern, Shilluk of the Kaka region joined Muslim immigrants in raids on the Dinka. Once Kaka had become a slave-market, slave raiding was probably the essential aim of these joint expeditions. Tensions between Shilluk and immigrant traders precipitated a crisis in 1860–1.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0021853700010859

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Trémaux, 1862, Voyage en Ethiopie au Soudan Oriental et dans la Nigritie, 54
  2. Tappi, 1903, Bull. Soc. Khéd. de Géog, 121
  3. Kaufmann, 1861, Das Gebiet des Weissen Flusses und dessen Bewohner, 57
  4. Evans-Pritchard, 1948, The Divine Kingship of the Shilluk of the Nilotic Sudan
  5. Ogot, 1964, The Historian in Tropical Africa, 294
  6. Gleichen, 1905, Survey of the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan
  7. Pallme, 1844, Travels in Kordofan, 147
  8. Browne, 1799, Travels in Africa, Egypt and Syria, 560
  9. Beltrame, 1861, Di un Viaggio sul Fiume Bianco nell'Africa Centrals, 10
  10. G., 1873, The Heart of Africa: three years travels and adventures in the unexplored regions of Central Africa 1868–71, 85
  11. Burckhardt, 1822, Travels in Nubia, 277
  12. Rüppell, 1829, Reisen in Nubien, Kordofan und dem peträischen Arabien, 160
  13. Westermann, 1912, The Shilluk People, their Language and Folklore, 162
  14. Poncet, 1863, Nouvelles Annales des Voyages, 23
  15. d'Antonio, 1859, Nouvelles Annales des Voyages, 26
  16. Selim, 1842, Voyage aux sources du Nil Blanc, Mem. Soc. Géog. de Paris, XVIII, 13
  17. Hillelson, 1923, Tabaqat Wad Dayf Allah: studies in the lives of scholars and saints, Sudan Notes and Records, VI
  18. Lienhardt, 1954, African Worlds, 144
  19. J., 1869, Travels in Central Africa and Explorations of the White Nile Tributaries, 4
  20. Gray, 1961, A history of the Southern Sudan 1839–1889, 76
  21. Werne, 1849, Expedition to Discover the Sources of the White Nile, 287
  22. Brun-Rollet, 1855, Le Nil Blanc et le Soudan, 48
  23. Hill, 1959, Egypt in the Sudan 1820–81, 60
  24. Holt, 1963, Funj Origins: a critique and new evidence, J. Afr. Hist., IV
  25. Beltrame, 1881, Il Fiume Bianco e i Denka, 83
  26. Crawford, 1951, The Fung Kingdom of Sennar, 160
  27. Hofmayr, 1925, Die Schilluk: Geschichte, Religion und Leben eines Niloten-Stämmes
  28. Douin, 1936, Histoire du règne du Khédive Ismail
  29. Thibaut, 1857, Nouvelles Annales des Voyages, 13
  30. von Heuglin, 1869, Reise in das Gebiet des Weissen Nil und seiner westlichen Zuflüsse 1862–4, 74
  31. Crazzolara, 1951, The Lwoo, 37
  32. James, 1905, Travels to Discover the Source of the Nile, 479
  33. Linant de Bellefonds, 1832, Journal of a Voyage on the Bahr Abiad or White Nile, J.R.G.S., 11, 180
  34. von Russegger, 1843, Reisen in Europa, Asien und Afrika, 64
  35. Bayard, 1854, Life and Landscapes from Egypt to the Negro Kingdoms of the White Nile, 331
  36. Knoblecher, Biblioteca Palatina Vindobonensis Codex. 14152
  37. Baker, 1874, Ismailia: A Narrative of the Expedition to Central Africa for the Suppression of the Slave Trade, organised by Ismail, Khedive of Egypt, 178
  38. Westermann, Introd., xxxi
  39. Petherick, 1861, Egypt, the Sudan and Central Africa, 354

Cited by

See all 37

Metadata

Authors
Mercer, P.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Mercer, Patricia
Venue
The Journal of African History
Published
1971-07
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
407-426
ISSN
  • 0021-8537 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5138
OpenAlex
W2166029455
Cited by
37
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of African History (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › African history and culture studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › African Studies and Geopolitics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Global Maritime and Colonial Histories
Keywords
Shilluk, White Nile, ivory trade, royal monopoly, kaka, Muslim refugees, slave raiding, Dinka

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Shilluk Trade and Politics from the mid–seventeenth century to 1861. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0021853700010859
The paper
Mercer, P. (1971). Shilluk Trade and Politics from the mid–seventeenth century to 1861. The Journal of African History. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021853700010859