The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
EXCAVATING NYANGA AGRICULTURAL HISTORY Nyanga: Ancient Fields, Settlements and Agricultural History in Zimbabwe. By R OBERT S OPER. Nairobi: British Institute in Eastern Africa, 2002. Pp. ix+277. £50 (ISBN 1-872566-12-X).
Abstract
EXCAVATING NYANGA AGRICULTURAL HISTORY Nyanga: Ancient Fields, Settlements and Agricultural History in Zimbabwe. By ROBERT SOPER. Nairobi: British Institute in Eastern Africa, 2002. Pp. ix+277. £50 (ISBN 1-872566-12-X). - Volume 45 Issue 2
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Nyanga agricultural complex is an Iron Age landscape in southern Africa with intensified agricultural systems of Bantu agropastoral societies that thrived between CE 1300 and 1900.
“The Nyanga agricultural complex is one of the unique Iron Age landscapes in southern Africa that portrays a colossal footprint of intensified agricultural systems of Bantu agropastoral societies that thrived between CE 1300 and 1900”
From Nyanga pottery and the Manyika ethnohistory: towards a decolonised archaeology of the Nyanga agricultural complex (2021) · cites this paper as Mitchell, 2004
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nyamushosho, R. T., Chipangura, N., Pasipanodya, T. B., Bandama, F., Chirikure, S., & Manyanga, M. (2021) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06609 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- MITCHELL, P.
- Venue
- The Journal of African History
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 319-321
- ISSN
- 0021-8537
- 1469-5138
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
