Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,962

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Determination of nitrogen in soil by the Kjeldahl method

Bremner, J. M.·1960·The Journal of Agricultural Science

Abstract

1. The reliability of the Kjeldahl method for the determination of nitrogen in soils has been investigated using a range of soils containing from 0·03 to 2·7% nitrogen. 2. The same result was obtained when soil was analysed by a variety of Kjeldahl procedures which included methods known to recover various forms of nitrogen not determined by Kjeldahl procedures commonly employed for soil analysis. From this and other evidence presented it is concluded that very little, if any, of the nitrogen in the soils examined was in the form of highly refractory nitrogen compounds or of compounds containing N—N or N—O linkages. 3. Results by the method of determining nitrogen in soils recommended by the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists were 10–37% lower than those obtained by other methods tested. Satisfactory results were obtained by this method when the period of digestion recommended was increased. 4. Ammonium-N fixed by clay minerals is determined by the Kjeldahl method. 5. Selenium and mercury are considerably more effective than copper for catalysis of Kjeldahl digestion of soil. Conditions leading to loss of nitrogen using selenium are defined, and difficulties encountered using mercury are discussed. 6. The most important factor in Kjeldahl analysis is the temperature of digestion with sulphuric acid, which is controlled largely by the amount of potassium (or sodium) sulphate used for digestion. 7. The period of digestion required for Kjeldahl analysis of soil depends on the concentration of potassium sulphate in the digest. When the concentration is low (e.g. 0·3 g./ml. sulphuric acid) it is necessary to digest for several hours; when it is high (e.g. 1·0 g./ml. sulphuric acid) short periods of digestion are adequate. Catalysts greatly affect the rate of digestion when the salt concentration is low, but have little effect when the salt concentration is high. 8. Nitrogen is lost during Kjeldahl analysis when the temperature of digestion exceeds about 400° C. 9. Determinations of the amounts of sulphuric acid consumed by various mineral and organic soils during Kjeldahl digestion showed that there is little risk of loss of nitrogen under the conditions usually employed for Kjeldahl digestion of soil. Acid consumption values for various soil constituents are given, from which the amounts of sulphuric acid likely to be consumed during Kjeldahl digestion of different types of soil can be calculated. 10. Semi-micro Kjeldahl methods of determining soil nitrogen gave the same results as macro-Kjeldahl methods. 11. The use of the Hoskins apparatus for the determination of ammonium is described. 12. It is concluded that the Kjeldahl method is satisfactory for the determination of nitrogen in soils provided a few simple precautions are observed. The merits and defects of different Kjeldahl procedures are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0021859600021572

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. 10.1017/S0021859600032767 · doi:10.1017/s0021859600032767
  2. 10.1021/ac60071a026 · doi:10.1021/ac60071a026
  3. Hiller, 1948, J. Biol. Chem., 176, 1401, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)57154-4 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Willits, 1949, J. Ass. Off. Agric. Chem., Wash., 32, 118
  5. Tinsley, 1950, Trans, 4th Int. Congr. Soil Sci., 1, 161
  6. 10.1021/ac60141a036 · doi:10.1021/ac60141a036
  7. Self, 1912, Pharm. J., 88, 384
  8. Secor, 1950, J. Ass. Off. Agric. Chem., Wash., 33, 872
  9. 10.1042/bj0360790 · doi:10.1042/bj0360790
  10. 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1954.tb02192.x · DOI
  11. 10.1039/an9568100316 · doi:10.1039/an9568100316
  12. Piper, 1944, Soil and Plant Analysis
  13. Olsen, 1929, C.R. Lab. Carlsberg, 17
  14. 10.1017/S0021859600019687 · doi:10.1017/s0021859600019687
  15. Campbell, 1937, J. Biol. Chem., 119, 1, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)74426-8 · DOI
  16. Clark, 1941, J. Ass. Off. Agric. Chem., Wash., 24, 641
  17. Jackson, 1958, Soil Chemical Analysis
  18. 10.1017/S0021859600083489 · doi:10.1017/s0021859600083489
  19. Jonnard, 1945, Industr. Engng Chem., 17, 246
  20. 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1959.tb02353.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1959.tb02353.x
  21. Collins, 1906, J. Soc. Chem. Ind., Lond., 25, 518
  22. 10.1007/BF01338151 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Friedrich, 1933, Die Praxis der quantitativen organischen Mikroanalyse
  24. Anantakrishnan, 1952, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., 36, 229, 10.1007/BF03050467 · doi:10.1007/bf03050467
  25. 10.1021/ac60062a028 · doi:10.1021/ac60062a028
  26. 10.1021/ac60065a033 · doi:10.1021/ac60065a033
  27. 10.1515/bchm2.1933.216.1-2.68 · doi:10.1515/bchm2.1933.216.1-2.68
  28. 10.1017/S0021859600040259 · doi:10.1017/s0021859600040259
  29. 10.1021/ac60126a024 · doi:10.1021/ac60126a024
  30. 10.1042/bj0370354 · doi:10.1042/bj0370354
  31. 10.1002/jctb.5000600704 · doi:10.1002/jctb.5000600704
  32. 10.1021/ac60013a015 · doi:10.1021/ac60013a015
  33. Alves, 1952, Melhoramento, 4, 135
  34. 10.1021/ac60085a044 · doi:10.1021/ac60085a044
  35. 1955, Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists
  36. 10.1139/cjr35b-025 · doi:10.1139/cjr35b-025
  37. 10.1002/jctb.5010040706 · doi:10.1002/jctb.5010040706
  38. 10.1017/S0021859600021924 · doi:10.1017/s0021859600021924
  39. 10.1038/175513b0 · doi:10.1038/175513b0
  40. 10.1021/ja01413a029 · doi:10.1021/ja01413a029
  41. 10.1007/BF01375926 · doi:10.1007/bf01375926
  42. Srinivasan, 1932, Indian J. Agric. Sci., 2, 525
  43. 10.1021/ac60038a038 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1021/ac60059a028 · doi:10.1021/ac60059a028
  45. 10.1017/S0021859600036625 · DOI
  46. Lauro, 1931, Industr. Engng Chem., 3, 401
  47. 10.1071/CH9540055 · DOI · Paper page
  48. White, 1948, J. Ass. Off. Agric. Chem., Wash., 31, 657
  49. McKibbin, 1935, Trans. 3rd Int. Congr. Soil Sci., 1, 419
  50. Ogg, 1950, J. Ass. Off. Agric. Chem., Wash., 33, 100
  51. Shinn, 1941, Industr. Engng Chem., 13, 33
  52. 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1951.tb13127.x · doi:10.1111/j.2042-7158.1951.tb13127.x
  53. Ashton, 1937, J. Soc. Chem. Ind., Lond., 56, 101, 10.1002/jctb.5000560501 · doi:10.1002/jctb.5000560501
  54. 10.1017/S0021859600082393 · doi:10.1017/s0021859600082393
  55. 10.1097/00010694-195812000-00010 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/S0065-3233(08)60079-0 · doi:10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60079-0
  57. 10.1021/ac60078a035 · doi:10.1021/ac60078a035
  58. Hoskins, 1944, Analyst, 69, 271

Cited by

See all 1,962

Metadata

Authors
Bremner, J. M.
Venue
The Journal of Agricultural Science
Published
1960-08
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
11-33
ISSN
  • 0021-8596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5146
OpenAlex
W2017945395
Cited by
1,962
References
0
FWCI
33.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of nitrogen in soil by the Kjeldahl method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0021859600021572
The paper
Bremner, J. M. (1960). Determination of nitrogen in soil by the Kjeldahl method. The Journal of Agricultural Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021859600021572

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.