The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A century of fungicide evolution
Abstract
Up until the 1940s chemical disease control relied upon inorganic chemical preparations, frequently prepared by the user. Key areas of use were horticulture and vegetable production with key targets being diseases that caused easily recognized damage. After this era and as the damaging effects of more crop diseases became obvious by the use of chemical control, the crop protection industry expanded rapidly and research to discover new active materials began in earnest. As new areas of chemistry were introduced, each one aiming to offer advantages over the previous ones, chemical families were born with research-based companies frequently adopting patent-busting strategies in order to capitalize on the developing fungicides market. Systemic fungicides offered new opportunities in disease control. The rise in Research and Development (R & D) and the increase in the number and quantity of chemicals being applied led to the introduction of regulation in the 1950s, initially on a voluntary basis, but now strictly controlled by legal obligations. In the 1960s, the market switched from horticulture and vegetables to one in which the main agricultural crops dominated. The cereal market, initially based on barley, moved to the current dominant market of wheat. The costs of R & D have risen dramatically in recent years and have become dominated not by the discovery process per se but by the provision of all the extra data needed to obtain registration. These rising costs happened at a time when markets showed little growth and are currently showing some decline. This has resulted in an industry that is continually striving to cut costs, normally by mergers and take-overs. As a consequence, many plant disease problems are not now being targeted by the industry and special measures have been introduced to ensure adequate disease control is available for these minor markets. Plant disease control will remain a necessity and fungicides will remain as a key factor in such control, although it is predicted that integrated control using chemicals, biological controls and biotechnology approaches will begin to dominate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
OERKE, E.-C. (2006) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859605005708 · Cited by 5,283
The Evolution of Fungicide Resistance
Lucas, J. A., Hawkins, N. J., & Fraaije, B. A. (2015) · Advances in Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1016/bs.aambs.2014.09.001 · Cited by 638
Sharma, H. S. S., Fleming, C., Selby, C., Rao, J. R., & Martin, T. (2014) · Journal of Applied Phycology · doi:10.1007/s10811-013-0101-9 · Cited by 615
Combining Biocontrol Agents with Chemical Fungicides for Integrated Plant Fungal Disease Control
Ons, L., Bylemans, D., Thevissen, K., & Cammue, B. P. A. (2020) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms8121930 · Cited by 438
Bacterial antimicrobial metal ion resistance
Hobman, J. L., & Crossman, L. C. (2015) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/jmm.0.023036-0 · Cited by 397
Metadata
- Authors
- RUSSELL, P. E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Agricultural Science
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 143
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-25
- ISSN
- 0021-8596 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5146
- OpenAlex
- W2108931847
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A century of fungicide evolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0021859605004971
- The paper
- RUSSELL, P. E. (2005). A century of fungicide evolution. The Journal of Agricultural Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021859605004971
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.